Amur Minerals Corp. — Update 24 May 2016

Amur Minerals (LN: AMC)

Last close As at 27/03/2024

1.46

0.00 (0.00%)

Market capitalisation

21m

More on this equity

Research: Metals & Mining

Amur Minerals Corp. — Update 24 May 2016

Amur Minerals Corp.

Lord Ashbourne

Written by

Lord Ashbourne

Director of Content, Mining

Metals & Mining

Amur Minerals Corp.

Proving resourceful

Resource update

Metals & mining

24 May 2016

Price

4.58p

Market cap

£24m

US$1.4569/US$

Net cash (US$m) at 30 June 2015

8.3

Shares in issue*
*Post March equity issue

514.9m

Free float

80%

Code

AMC

Primary exchange

AIM

Secondary exchange

N/A

Share price performance

%

1m

3m

12m

Abs

(11.8)

(39.7)

(75.2)

Rel (local)

(9.8)

(41.7)

(72.1)

52-week high/low

42.8p

4.2p

Business description

Amur Minerals is an exploration and development company focused on base metal projects in Russia’s Far East. The company’s principal asset is the Kun-Manie nickel sulphide deposit in the Amur Oblast, comprising almost a million tonnes of contained nickel equivalent in at least five deposits.

Next event

DFS

End 2017

Analyst

Charles Gibson

+44 (0)20 3077 5724

Amur Minerals Corp. is a research client of Edison Investment Research Limited

Following its resource updates for Maly Kurumkon-Flangovy (MKFL) and Ikenskoe-Sobolevsky (IKEN) in April and May, respectively, on 10 May Amur announced the results of the process to similarly upgrade and refine the resource at Kubuk. Overall, the update demonstrated a 24.8% increase in mineralised tonnages at Kubuk to take the total resource at Kun-Manie to 740.1kt of contained nickel, or 982.7kt of nickel equivalent. The newly developed geological models for MKFL, IKEN and Kubuk were compiled by SRK in accordance with JORC standards and have been approved by SRK for use in the subsequent definition of reserves.

Year end

Revenue (US$m)

PBT*
(US$m)

EPS*
(c)

DPS
(c)

P/E
(x)

Yield
(%)

12/13

0.0

(3.7)

(1.0)

0.0

N/A

N/A

12/14

0.0

(2.5)

(0.6)

0.0

N/A

N/A

12/15e

0.0

1.0

0.1

0.0

88.7

N/A

12/16e

0.0

(1.7)

(0.3)

0.0

N/A

N/A

Note: *PBT and EPS are normalised, excluding amortisation of acquired intangibles, exceptional items and share-based payments.

Resource equivalent to 982.7kt nickel equivalent

The Kubuk update completes the resource estimation phase of the definitive feasibility study at Kun-Manie and now allows for the definition of reserves. Containing 107Mt of material at an average grade of 0.45% Ni, Amur anticipates that the measured and indicated categories of resources at Kun-Manie are likely to be extensive enough to support operations in the important early years of any mining operation, during which construction loans are due to be repaid. To this end, SGS is updating grade-recovery curves for each of the deposits to determine the metal that is recoverable to concentrate. As soon as this is completed, Amur will award reserve definition work to an independent consultant to be performed to DFS standards, followed by an integrated mine plan and optimised schedule. (This is likely to involve the advancement of mining high grade, underground ore in the mining sequence and could therefore materially affect the economics of the project and the most efficient approach to its development).

Valuation: 33c (subject to improvement)

Based on the existing (open cast) operational blueprint, we estimate updated valuations of the concentrate, low-grade matte, high-grade matte and refined metal options for Kun-Manie of 26c, 33c, 26c and 30c (vs 24c, 31c, 24c and 28c, previously), respectively, using a 10% discount rate and at our long-term nickel price of US$22,355/t (assuming 80:20 debt:equity funding). Stated alternatively, assuming equity dilution at the current share price of 4.58p/share, Amur’s shares offer investors internal rates of return of 28.6-34.2% in US dollar terms over 18 years. However, this could increase if the mine plan is materially reconfigured to bring high-grade underground production forward. In the meantime, we estimate that Amur’s enterprise value equates to US$34.67 per tonne of nickel contained in the Kun-Manie deposit (vs US$58.67/t at the end of FY15).

Kubuk resource update

Following its resource updates for MKFL and IKEN in April and May, respectively, on 10 May Amur announced the results of the process to similarly upgrade and refine the resource at Kubuk:

Exhibit 1: Kubuk resource upgrade (May 2016 vs April 2015)

Tonnage

(Mt)

Grade Ni

(%)

Contained Ni (t)

Grade Cu (%)

Contained Cu (t)

Grade Pt (g/t)

Contained Pt (t)

Grade Pd (g/t)

Contained Pd (t)

Kubuk (May 2016)

Measured

0.0

0.00

0

0.00

0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Indicated

3.7

0.76

28,500

0.18

7,300

0.2

0.7

0.2

0.7

Measured & indicated

3.7

0.76

28,500

0.19

7,300

0.2

0.7

0.2

0.7

Inferred

22.0

0.47

104,500

0.15

32,100

0.1

3.1

0.1

2.7

Total

25.7

0.52

133,000

0.15

39,400

0.1

3.8

0.1

3.4

Kubuk (April 2015)

Measured

0.0

0.00

0

0.00

0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Indicated

3.5

0.68

23,400

0.18

6,100

0.1

0.5

0.1

0.4

Measured & indicated

3.5

0.68

23,400

0.17

6,100

0.1

0.5

0.1

0.4

Inferred

17.1

0.56

95,500

0.16

26,800

0.1

2.5

0.1

2.0

Total

20.6

0.58

118,900

0.16

32,900

0.1

3.0

0.1

2.4

Change (units)

Measured

0.0

0.00

0

0.00

0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Indicated

0.2

0.08

5,100

0.00

1,200

0.1

0.3

0.1

0.3

Measured & indicated

0.2

0.08

5,100

0.01

1,200

0.1

0.3

0.1

0.3

Inferred

4.9

-0.10

9,000

-0.01

5,300

0.0

0.5

0.0

0.7

Total

5.1

-0.06

14,100

-0.01

6,500

0.0

0.8

0.0

1.0

Change (percent)

Measured

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Indicated

5.7

11.8

21.8

-1.5

19.7

100.0

60.9

86.2

72.3

Measured & indicated

5.7

11.8

21.8

7.5

19.7

52.2

60.9

62.9

72.3

Inferred

28.7

-17.0

9.4

-8.8

19.8

40.0

21.3

24.6

37.1

Total

24.8

-10.3

11.9

-4.0

19.8

2.1

27.4

14.6

42.9

Source: Amur Minerals, Edison Investment Research

As with MKFL and IKEN, differentiated high- and low-grade domains were defined, comprising a continuous nickel grade of at least 0.5% and a continuous nickel grade of at least 0.2% (vs 0.2% at IKEN and 0.1% at MKFL, including intercalated waste), respectively. The result of this enhanced definition is as follows:

Exhibit 2: Kubuk resource upgrade, by domain

Tonnage

(Mt)

Grade Ni

(%)

Contained Ni (t)

Grade Cu (%)

Contained Cu (t)

Grade Pt (g/t)

Contained Pt (t)

Grade Pd (g/t)

Contained Pd (t)

High grade domain

Measured

0.0

0.00

0

0

0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Indicated

2.7

0.90

24,100

0.22

5,800

0.2

0.5

0.2

0.5

Sub total

2.7

0.90

24,100

0.22

5,800

0.2

0.5

0.2

0.5

Inferred

10.7

0.71

76,300

0.19

20,600

0.2

1.7

0.1

1.5

Total

13.4

0.75

100,400

0.20

26,400

0.2

2.2

0.2

2.0

Low grade domain

Measured

0.0

0.00

0

0.00

0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Indicated

1.1

0.29

4,300

0.09

1,400

0.1

0.2

0.2

0.2

Sub total

1.1

0.39

4,300

0.13

1,400

0.1

0.2

0.2

0.2

Inferred

11.3

0.25

28,200

0.1

11,500

0.1

1.5

0.1

1.2

Total

12.4

0.26

32,500

0.10

12,900

0.1

1.6

0.1

1.4

Total Measured

0.0

0.00

0

0.00

0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Total Indicated

3.7

0.76

28,500

0.18

7,300

0.2

0.7

0.2

0.7

Total Measured & indicated

3.7

0.76

28,500

0.19

7,300

0.2

0.7

0.2

0.7

Total Inferred

22.0

0.47

104,500

0.15

32,100

0.1

3.1

0.1

2.7

Grand Total

25.7

0.52

133,000

0.15

39,400

0.1

3.8

0.1

3.4

Source: Amur Minerals, Edison Investment Research

Again, data was provided at increasing cut-off grades to allow the construction of a basic grade-tonnage diagram:

Exhibit 3: Kubuk grade-tonnage diagram

Source: Amur Minerals, Edison Investment Research

Of note is that 71.8% (vs 74.9% at MKFL and 78.9% at IKEN) of the total contained metal at a 0% cut-off grade remains at a 0.4% Ni cut-off (95.5kt out of 133.0kt) – again suggesting the existence of distinct high-grade zones. Note that this may also be inferred from the flattening of the tonnage curve in particular at a relatively high level in Exhibit 3. Similarly, management estimates that 100.4kt of nickel (at a 0% cut-off) is contained within high-grade lenses. The total tonnage in excess of a 0.4% cut-off grade for both the low and high grade shells is 95.5kt.

Effect on Kun-Manie

The effect of the Kubuk resource upgrades (as well as those for MKFL and IKEN) on the Kun-Manie project as a whole is to increase the mineralised tonnage by 36.3% and contained nickel by 13.8% and the measured and indicated component of the resource by exactly 100.0% (albeit principally as a result of the MKFL upgrade).

Exhibit 4: Kun-Manie resource upgrade (May 2016 vs April 2015)

Tonnage

(Mt)

Grade Ni

(%)

Contained Ni (t)

Grade Cu (%)

Contained Cu (t)

Grade Pt (g/t)

Contained Pt (t)

Grade Pd (g/t)

Contained Pd (t)

Kun-Manie (May 2016)

Measured

18.3

0.51

93,300

0.14

25,600

0.2

3.4

0.2

3.7

Indicated

88.7

0.44

390,900

0.12

111,100

0.1

9.6

0.1

10.2

Measured & indicated

107.0

0.45

484,100

0.13

136,600

0.1

13.0

0.1

13.9

Inferred

57.7

0.44

255,900

0.13

76,200

0.1

7.7

0.1

7.8

Total

164.7

0.45

740,100

0.13

212,900

0.1

20.6

0.1

21.7

Kun-Manie (April 2015)

Measured

15.7

0.52

81,800

0.13

21,100

0.2

2.9

0.2

3.2

Indicated

37.8

0.56

210,500

0.15

57,000

0.1

4.6

0.1

5.3

Measured & indicated

53.5

0.55

292,300

0.15

78,100

0.1

7.5

0.2

8.5

Inferred

67.3

0.53

358,300

0.15

100,300

0.1

9.4

0.1

9.5

Total

120.8

0.54

650,600

0.15

178,400

0.1

16.9

0.1

18.0

Change (units)

Measured

2.6

-0.01

11,500

0.01

4,500

0.0

0.5

0.0

0.5

Indicated

50.9

-0.12

180,400

-0.04

54,100

0.0

5.0

0.0

4.9

Measured & indicated

53.5

-0.09

191,800

-0.02

58,500

0.0

5.6

0.0

5.4

Inferred

-9.6

-0.09

-102,400

-0.02

-24,100

0.0

-1.7

0.0

-1.7

Total

43.9

-0.09

89,500

-0.02

34,500

0.0

3.7

0.0

3.7

Change (percent)

Measured

16.6

-2.1

14.1

4.1

21.3

-0.3

16.2

-0.6

15.9

Indicated

134.7

-20.9

85.7

-23.6

94.9

-10.5

110.0

-17.7

93.0

Measured & indicated

100.0

-17.2

65.6

-12.5

74.9

-12.6

74.9

-18.0

64.0

Inferred

-14.3

-16.7

-28.6

-11.4

-24.0

-4.9

-18.5

-4.3

-18.0

Total

36.3

-16.6

13.8

-12.5

19.3

-10.4

22.2

-11.5

20.7

Source: Amur Minerals, Edison Investment Research

For the amount of drilling performed, the increase in the resource equates to 7,541t of mineralised material and 15.4t of contained nickel per metre drilled on average over the three deposits (NB Management estimates its all-in cost of drilling to be US$75-100 per metre drilled, including that performed for bulk metallurgical testwork).

At the prevailing prices of the contained metals in question (namely US$8,330/t Ni, US$4,562/t Cu, US$1,006/oz Pt and US$547/oz Pd), the total Kun-Manie resource equates to 982.7kt of contained nickel equivalent (NiE).

In the aftermath of the Kubuk resource upgrade, MKFL now accounts for 50% of the total Kun-Manie resource (vs 45% beforehand), while Ikenskoe-Sobolevsky has declined from 27% to 24% and Kubuk remains unchanged, at 18%.

Exhibit 5: Kun-Manie resource by deposit (% based on contained nickel)

Source: Amur Minerals, Edison Investment Research

At the time of our December update note, Amur’s enterprise value equated to US$58.67 per tonne of contained nickel (including by-products), on which basis the increase in the Kun-Manie resource of 89,500t of contained nickel as a result of Amur’s efforts should be worth US$5.3m to the company (compared to the US$3.3m cost of the associated exploration).

Timetable and milestones

From the perspective of Russia’s legal framework, Amur is operating under the auspices of a temporary TEO (note, a Russian TEO equates to a western feasibility study) – the ‘temporary’ nature of the TEO allowing Amur to conclude its exploration activities. The key piece of work to upgrade the status of its TEO from ‘temporary’ to ‘permanent’ is a bulk sample, which Amur is prioritising for 2016. In this case, it is likely to be in the form of a core bulk sample that is large enough for a pilot plant test to determine the metallurgical characteristics of the concentrate produced. Management has stated that it is prepared to fly the bulk sample out from site by helicopter if necessary (a 20t bulk sample would require approximately eight helicopter flights to transport). As a result, Amur believes it will be possible to produce a definitive feasibility study to both Russian (more onerous re permitting etc) and western standards (more onerous re social, environmental and economic standards etc) in 15-21 months (ie in H217).

Next steps

Exploration

For the purposes of finalising its DFS, SRK is completing a full geological and field procedure review of Amur’s operations at Kun-Manie.

In the context of the broader mineralisation at Kun-Manie, the 2015 exploration drilling at Flangovy in particular could be interpreted as being indicative of a single, continuous corridor of mineralisation, approximately 2.5km long, 20-30m thick and at an in-situ grade from 0.7-0.9% nickel, running from Maly Kurumkon through Flangovy to Gorny. It is also possible that there is another similar such corridor from Ikenskoe-Sobolevsky to Kubuk. As a result, it is Amur’s intention to continue drilling at Kun-Manie into the foreseeable future. Amur’s upcoming 2016 field season is expected to start early (on account of prevailing clement weather conditions) and will again be focused on the MKFL deposit, at which two categories of work will be pursued, including resource related drilling (both in-fill and step-out) and metallurgical and rock mechanics sample collection in support of mine design parameters.

Thereafter, the focus of future drill programmes will be towards similarly upgrading and expanding resources at Kubuk via an estimated 7-8km in-fill drill programme. To this end, drill sites have been identified and variously prepared at Sobolevsky with a view to determining the continuity of a 20m thick, >1% nickel outcrop in the direction Kubuk (see below). Vodorazdelny is not a candidate to be remodelled since it is intended to be mined by open-cast methods alone and Gorny is similarly not a candidate owing to the fact that its grade is too low.

In addition to a future in-fill programme at Kubuk, there is also potential for a step-out programme to the east and down-dip below 400m. Together with its existing LF-70, Amur’s recent purchase of a Boart Longyear LF-90 drill rig will double the number of metres that it can drill in a season to c 15,000m. This represents a 40% increase in the total metres drilled since the acquisition of Amur’s original exploration licence in 2004. Pro-rata to the May 2016 Kun-Manie resource upgrade, a drill programme of 15,000m could be expected to yield a 113.1Mt increase in mineralised tonnage, containing 230,615t of contained nickel. Simultaneously, two new D9R Caterpillar bulldozers (effectively representing a seed capital fleet) have been mobilised to set up ready access along the full length of the Kurumkon trend in preparation for pre-production development.

Exhibit 6: The five currently defined exploration areas at Kun-Manie

Source: Amur Minerals

SRK used Leapfrog technology to build the high-grade model at Kubuk, which will allow the definition of simulated mining units (SMUs) to an accuracy of 5mx5m and ultimately allow Amur to generate a mining schedule and model for the deposit.

Metallurgy

To date, testing has determined that each deposit has different metallurgical recoveries. As a result, SGS is updating grade-recovery curves for each of the deposits to determine the recoverable metal to be extracted to concentrate by the ore treatment facility. As soon as this is complete, Amur will award reserve definition stage work to an independent consultant to be performed to DFS standards, followed by an integrated mine plan and optimised schedule. This is likely to involve advancing the mining of high grade, underground ore and could therefore materially affect the economics of the project compared to that currently envisaged.

The Far East and Baikal Region Development Fund

In March, Amur announced the signing of a non-binding Heads of Terms Agreement with the Russian government’s Far East and Baikal Region Development Fund. In broad terms, the agreement expresses the intention of the fund and the company to expand their collaboration on funding Kun-Manie and provides a starting point for detailed negotiations establishing technical feasibility requirements, funding needs, terms and conditions and timelines.

In particular, in conjunction with the existing mandate for fundraising from potential strategic partners in Russia, China, and India (which continues to be the cornerstone of Amur’s strategy), the agreement expands the funding scope to include the prospect of federal financing of overall mine, plant and smelter development, as well as potential state funding of infrastructure.

The fund typically participates in infrastructure, such as the required 320km road from the Baikal Amur railhead at Verkhnezeisk to the Kun-Manie site and the extension of an existing power line to the location of the planned smelting facilities (located close to the rail spur from the BAM line to the Elga coal project in Yakutia). If implemented, the concurrent development of road and smelter facilities could result in the development of a new industrial hub in Amur Oblast, in which Amur Minerals would play in central role.

Development

Once its definitive feasibility study is completed and the project is financed, Amur envisages a two-year construction period in CY18 and CY19 before first production of nickel in CY20. Produced to meet Russian and western standards, an appropriate permanent TEO could, in turn, lend the project naturally to Russian project finance, in which case management has suggested that an 80:20 debt:equity financing structure could be achievable. However, it is understood that Amur is also investigating the potential to access funding via a streaming arrangement relating to its by-products, in particular. Streaming is associated with less risk than debt (and is not considered as debt by lending banks), as it has neither a fixed repayment schedule nor associated debt-service covenants.

In the meantime, management continues to work on improving the operational blueprint published in June 2015 (and which built on the earlier, conceptual open-pit study). Currently, it envisages that Maly Kurumkon-Flangovy, Ikenskoe-Sobolevsky and Kubuk will support both underground and open-pit mining operations and that Vodorazdelny will support open-pit mining operations alone. In addition, it believes that it has identified a potential c US$150m in capex savings, which could then be used to invest in a flash smelter (vs the electric furnace smelter and converter smelter configuration envisaged).

Valuation

In our Update note of 9 May 2016, we estimated valuations of the concentrate, low-grade matte, high-grade matte and refined metal options for Kun-Manie of 24c, 31c, 24c and 28c, respectively, using a 10% discount rate and at our long-term nickel price of US$22,355/t (assuming 80:20 debt:equity funding). Updating these valuations to reflect a share price of 4.58p modifies these estimates to 26c, 33c, 26c and 30c, respectively, as shown below:

Exhibit 7: AMC equity valuations by development scenario and discount rate

US cents per share
(post-dilution)

0%

5%

10%
(base case)

15%

20%

25%

30%

IRR

(%)

Toll smelting – US$122m in equity fund-raising required

72

42

26

17

11

8

5

30.8

Low-grade matte – US$157m in equity fund-raising required

96

55

33

21

14

9

7

34.2

High-grade matte – US$202m in equity fund-raising required

77

43

26

16

10

7

5

28.6

Refinery – US$282m in equity fund-raising required

89

51

30

19

12

8

6

32.0

Source: Edison Investment Research. Note: Assuming 80% maximum financial leverage. Excludes warrant funding.

Once again, the low-grade matte option prevails as the most efficient deployment of capital, although investors should note that this could change if the resource and mine plan are materially reconfigured as a result of the advancement of high grade production from underground, in particular.

Financials

Amur had a net cash position of US$8.3m at 30 June 2015 and reported that it had US$6.0m at 1 December, implying a cash burn rate of US$0.46m per month or US$2.76m (pro-rata) for H215 (cf cash burn rates of US$3.9m in FY13, US$1.7m in H114, US$2.7m in FY14 and US$2.7m in H115).

Since 1 December, the company has raised £5.0 gross (an estimated US$6.9m net) from two tranches of equity issuance relating to the Crede Capital agreement (see our note dated 25 January). On 17 March, Amur reported that it had US$7.4m in cash on its balance sheet as at 1 March 2016, implying US$5.5m of cash consumption in the three months from 1 December to 1 March – equivalent to US$1.8m per month. However, this is also likely to include capital expenditure of US$2.48m in respect of the Boart Longyear LF-90 diamond core drill rig, two new Caterpillar D9R bulldozers and 329D excavator that Amur announced that it had purchased on 27 November. Excluding these, the cash burn rate is calculated to have been around US$1.0m per month.

In the wake of the Crede announcement, we forecast that Amur will have had a net cash position of US$9.1m at 31 December 2015 and will have one of US$18.1m at 31 December 2016, after an additional £7.5m (estimated US$10.1m net) in Crede funding for the remainder of FY16.

Exhibit 8: Financial summary

US$'000s

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015e

2016e

Year end 31 December

IFRS

IFRS

IFRS

IFRS

IFRS

IFRS

IFRS

PROFIT & LOSS

Revenue

 

 

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Cost of Sales

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Gross Profit

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

EBITDA

 

 

(1,928)

(2,892)

(1,750)

(2,539)

(2,358)

(2,148)

(2,148)

Operating Profit (before GW and except.)

(1,928)

(2,892)

(1,750)

(2,539)

(2,358)

(1,869)

(1,869)

Intangible Amortisation

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Exceptionals

(328)

(1,505)

(435)

(151)

1,158

1,672

0

Other

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Operating Profit

(2,256)

(4,397)

(2,185)

(2,690)

(1,200)

(197)

(1,869)

Net Interest

0

(211)

(1,813)

(1,141)

(161)

2,838

136

Other

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Profit Before Tax (norm)

 

 

(1,928)

(3,103)

(3,563)

(3,680)

(2,519)

969

(1,733)

Profit Before Tax (FRS 3)

 

 

(2,256)

(4,608)

(3,998)

(3,831)

(1,361)

2,641

(1,733)

Tax

0

0

0

0

0

(634)

0

Profit After Tax (norm)

(1,928)

(3,103)

(3,563)

(3,680)

(2,519)

335

(1,733)

Profit After Tax (FRS 3)

(2,256)

(4,608)

(3,998)

(3,831)

(1,361)

2,007

(1,733)

Average Number of Shares Outstanding (m)

193.9

271.8

345.1

387.2

431.2

445.7

585.7

EPS - normalised (c)

 

 

(1.0)

(1.1)

(1.0)

(1.0)

(0.6)

0.1

(0.3)

EPS - FRS 3 (c)

 

 

(1.2)

(1.7)

(1.2)

(1.0)

(0.3)

0.5

(0.3)

Dividend per share (c)

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Gross Margin (%)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

EBITDA Margin (%)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Operating Margin (before GW and except.) (%)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

BALANCE SHEET

Fixed Assets

 

 

14,151

13,903

17,928

18,955

12,035

17,372

20,651

Intangible Assets

13,685

13,503

17,084

18,318

11,783

14,053

17,053

Tangible Assets

466

400

844

637

252

3,319

3,598

Other receivables

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Current Assets

 

 

7,215

7,386

8,389

11,074

9,090

9,658

18,738

Stocks

167

165

224

269

237

512

512

Trade Debtors

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Cash

3,066

4,436

2,048

2,392

1,389

9,063

18,143

Other receivables/other

3,982

2,785

6,117

8,413

7,464

83

83

Current Liabilities

 

 

(109)

(102)

(119)

(123)

(407)

(165)

(165)

Creditors

(109)

(102)

(119)

(123)

(407)

(165)

(165)

Short term borrowings

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Long Term Liabilities

 

 

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Long term borrowings

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Other long term liabilities

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Net Assets

 

 

21,257

21,187

26,198

29,906

20,718

26,865

39,224

CASH FLOW

Operating Cash Flow

 

 

(1,201)

(2,761)

(1,071)

(1,556)

(1,960)

(2,665)

(2,148)

Net Interest

0

0

0

0

0

2,838

136

Tax

0

0

0

0

0

(634)

0

Capex

(492)

(20)

(3,482)

(2,315)

(748)

(5,058)

(3,000)

Acquisitions/disposals

363

0

0

0

0

0

0

Financing

3,527

4,344

2,165

4,242

1,841

13,046

14,092

Dividends

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Net Cash Flow

2,197

1,563

(2,388)

371

(867)

7,528

9,080

Opening net debt/(cash)

 

 

(997)

(3,066)

(4,436)

(2,048)

(2,392)

(1,389)

(9,063)

HP finance leases initiated

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Other

(128)

(193)

0

(27)

(136)

146

0

Closing net debt/(cash)

 

 

(3,066)

(4,436)

(2,048)

(2,392)

(1,389)

(9,063)

(18,143)

Source: Company sources, Edison Investment Research

Edison, the investment intelligence firm, is the future of investor interaction with corporates. Our team of over 100 analysts and investment professionals work with leading companies, fund managers and investment banks worldwide to support their capital markets activity. We provide services to more than 400 retained corporate and investor clients from our offices in London, New York, Frankfurt, Sydney and Wellington. Edison is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Edison Investment Research (NZ) Limited (Edison NZ) is the New Zealand subsidiary of Edison. Edison NZ is registered on the New Zealand Financial Service Providers Register (FSP number 247505) and is registered to provide wholesale and/or generic financial adviser services only. Edison Investment Research Inc (Edison US) is the US subsidiary of Edison and is regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Edison Investment Research Limited (Edison Aus) [46085869] is the Australian subsidiary of Edison and is not regulated by the Australian Securities and Investment Commission. Edison Germany is a branch entity of Edison Investment Research Limited [4794244]. www.edisongroup.com

DISCLAIMER
Copyright 2016 Edison Investment Research Limited. All rights reserved. This report has been commissioned by Amur Minerals Corp. and prepared and issued by Edison for publication globally. All information used in the publication of this report has been compiled from publicly available sources that are believed to be reliable, however we do not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this report. Opinions contained in this report represent those of the research department of Edison at the time of publication. The securities described in the Investment Research may not be eligible for sale in all jurisdictions or to certain categories of investors. This research is issued in Australia by Edison Aus and any access to it, is intended only for "wholesale clients" within the meaning of the Australian Corporations Act. The Investment Research is distributed in the United States by Edison US to major US institutional investors only. Edison US is registered as an investment adviser with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Edison US relies upon the "publishers' exclusion" from the definition of investment adviser under Section 202(a)(11) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and corresponding state securities laws. As such, Edison does not offer or provide personalised advice. We publish information about companies in which we believe our readers may be interested and this information reflects our sincere opinions. The information that we provide or that is derived from our website is not intended to be, and should not be construed in any manner whatsoever as, personalised advice. Also, our website and the information provided by us should not be construed by any subscriber or prospective subscriber as Edison’s solicitation to effect, or attempt to effect, any transaction in a security. The research in this document is intended for New Zealand resident professional financial advisers or brokers (for use in their roles as financial advisers or brokers) and habitual investors who are “wholesale clients” for the purpose of the Financial Advisers Act 2008 (FAA) (as described in sections 5(c) (1)(a), (b) and (c) of the FAA). This is not a solicitation or inducement to buy, sell, subscribe, or underwrite any securities mentioned or in the topic of this document. This document is provided for information purposes only and should not be construed as an offer or solicitation for investment in any securities mentioned or in the topic of this document. A marketing communication under FCA Rules, this document has not been prepared in accordance with the legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research.
Edison has a restrictive policy relating to personal dealing. Edison Group does not conduct any investment business and, accordingly, does not itself hold any positions in the securities mentioned in this report. However, the respective directors, officers, employees and contractors of Edison may have a position in any or related securities mentioned in this report. Edison or its affiliates may perform services or solicit business from any of the companies mentioned in this report. The value of securities mentioned in this report can fall as well as rise and are subject to large and sudden swings. In addition it may be difficult or not possible to buy, sell or obtain accurate information about the value of securities mentioned in this report. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance. Forward-looking information or statements in this report contain information that is based on assumptions, forecasts of future results, estimates of amounts not yet determinable, and therefore involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of their subject matter to be materially different from current expectations. For the purpose of the FAA, the content of this report is of a general nature, is intended as a source of general information only and is not intended to constitute a recommendation or opinion in relation to acquiring or disposing (including refraining from acquiring or disposing) of securities. The distribution of this document is not a “personalised service” and, to the extent that it contains any financial advice, is intended only as a “class service” provided by Edison within the meaning of the FAA (ie without taking into account the particular financial situation or goals of any person). As such, it should not be relied upon in making an investment decision. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Edison, its affiliates and contractors, and their respective directors, officers and employees will not be liable for any loss or damage arising as a result of reliance being placed on any of the information contained in this report and do not guarantee the returns on investments in the products discussed in this publication. FTSE International Limited (“FTSE”) © FTSE 2016. “FTSE®” is a trade mark of the London Stock Exchange Group companies and is used by FTSE International Limited under license. All rights in the FTSE indices and/or FTSE ratings vest in FTSE and/or its licensors. Neither FTSE nor its licensors accept any liability for any errors or omissions in the FTSE indices and/or FTSE ratings or underlying data. No further distribution of FTSE Data is permitted without FTSE’s express written consent.

Frankfurt +49 (0)69 78 8076 960

Schumannstrasse 34b

60325 Frankfurt

Germany

London +44 (0)20 3077 5700

280 High Holborn

London, WC1V 7EE

United Kingdom

New York +1 646 653 7026

245 Park Avenue, 39th Floor

10167, New York

US

Sydney +61 (0)2 9258 1161

Level 25, Aurora Place

88 Phillip St, Sydney

NSW 2000, Australia

Wellington +64 (0)48 948 555

Level 15, 171 Featherston St

Wellington 6011

New Zealand

Frankfurt +49 (0)69 78 8076 960

Schumannstrasse 34b

60325 Frankfurt

Germany

London +44 (0)20 3077 5700

280 High Holborn

London, WC1V 7EE

United Kingdom

New York +1 646 653 7026

245 Park Avenue, 39th Floor

10167, New York

US

Sydney +61 (0)2 9258 1161

Level 25, Aurora Place

88 Phillip St, Sydney

NSW 2000, Australia

Wellington +64 (0)48 948 555

Level 15, 171 Featherston St

Wellington 6011

New Zealand

More on Amur Minerals

View All

Metals & Mining

Amur Minerals — Russian TEO status

Metals & Mining

Amur Minerals — Kunning

Metals & Mining

Amur Minerals — Gaining traction

Metals & Mining

Amur Minerals — Cobalt-plated nickel

Latest from the Metals & Mining sector

View All Metals & Mining content

Is Yatirim Menkul Degerler — Update 24 May 2016

Is Yatirim Menkul Degerler

Continue Reading

Subscribe to Edison

Get access to the very latest content matched to your personal investment style.

Sign up for free