Intelligent Energy Holdings — Update 23 November 2016

Intelligent Energy Holdings — Update 23 November 2016

Intelligent Energy Holdings

Analyst avatar placeholder

Written by

Intelligent Energy Holdings

Small is beautiful

Strategy update
& FY16 results

Alternative energy

23 November 2016

Price

10.50p

Market cap

£22m

Net debt* (£m) at end September 2016
*Convertible loan notes treated as £30.0m debt

9.4

Shares in issue

206.2m

Free float

79.4%

Code

IEH

Primary exchange

LSE

Secondary exchange

N/A

Share price performance

%

1m

3m

12m

Abs

(17.7)

29.6

(88.1)

Rel (local)

(15.5)

30.0

(88.9)

52-week high/low

90.0p

7.1p

Business description

Intelligent Energy Holdings plc delivers clean energy solutions for the distributed energy, diesel replacement, automotive and aerial drone markets. Working with international companies, Intelligent Energy aims to embed its fuel cell stack technology into applications across its target market sectors. With its principal facility and headquarters in Loughborough, UK, the company also operates in Japan, India, China, Singapore, France and the US.

Next events

AGM

March 2017

Analysts

Anne Margaret Crow

+44 (0)20 3077 5700

Roger Johnston

+44 (0)20 3077 5722

Intelligent Energy Holdings is a research client of Edison Investment Research Limited

Intelligent Energy (IEH) has developed a high power density fuel cell technology suitable for use in multiple sectors. The group has an excellent record of providing technology for automotive companies, most notably for the Suzuki Burgman electric scooter. Under its revised strategy, it is focusing on near-term opportunities to deliver products for deployment in distributed power generation, UAV and consumer electronics applications to drive revenue growth during the years before mainstream adoption of fuel cell vehicles. We reintroduce our estimates to reflect the new strategy.

Year
end

Revenue (£m)

EBITDA**
(£m)

PBT*
(£m)

EPS*
(p)

DPS
(p)

P/E
(x)

09/14

13.6

(52.4)

(58.0)

(30.4)

0.0

N/A

09/15

78.2

(46.2)

(51.8)

(21.4)

0.0

N/A

09/16

91.8

(33.4)

(42.8)

(20.2)

0.0

N/A

09/17e

34.0

(12.0)

(20.5)

(8.5)

0.0

N/A

Note: *PBT and EPS are normalised, excluding amortisation of acquired intangibles, exceptional items and share-based payments. **Adjusted as per company presentation.

Focus on commercially available product

CEO Martin Bloom, who was appointed in June 2016, has refined the diversification strategy so it is focused on sales of commercially ready B2B products for deployment in mobile and distributed power generation including diesel generator replacements and commercial drone applications. We model this as contributing £5.0m revenues during FY17. Funded development work on stacks for embedded portable electronic devices and lower power, air-cooled motive applications is being continued. However, development work on higher power output, evaporatively cooled technology has been mothballed unless third party funding for IEH’s work materialises. The power management activity in India is either to be split off into a separate entity in which the group has a minority stake, or restructured, hence the reduction in our FY17 group revenue estimate compared to FY16. The capability to sustain fuel cell deployment will be sustained in either scenario.

Revised strategy reduces cash burn

FY16 performance was in line with the September trading update. Revenues rose by 17% y-o-y reflecting a full year of operating the GTP portfolio of c 27,000 telecoms towers. Staffing levels have been halved, so adjusted EBITDA losses narrowed to £33.4m (£46.2m in FY15). The group exited FY16 with an adjusted EBITDA loss of c £1.1m/month, c £1.6m including cash interest charges and capex. The cash balance at end FY16 was £20.6m. Our estimates show that the group has sufficient funds to support activities throughout FY17, but may need additional finance in FY18, depending on the rate and nature of sales growth.

Valuation: Product sales to drive re-rating

Our analysis indicates that IEH is trading on a prospective EV/sales multiples that is towards the lower end of the range of its peers. We believe the successful execution of the revised strategy, resulting in meaningful product sales during FY17, will be a key catalyst for future share price performance.

Investment summary

Company description: Proven compact fuel cell technology

Intelligent Energy develops and manufactures PEM (proton exchange membrane) fuel cells that exhibit industry leading power densities. This makes them particularly suitable for applications where size and weight must be kept to a minimum. This includes lightweight vehicles such as motorcycles, drones, smartphones, laptops and lower output distributed power generation systems. The technology is now commercially available having been proven during field deployments in telecoms towers and demonstrated to work in devices as varied as Suzuki’s Bergman motorbike, a London taxicab, a 1m diameter UAV (unmanned aerial vehicle) and a grid-independent phone charger that was launched in Apple stores in calendar Q414.

Financials: Refined strategy conserves cash

Until 2013 IEH focused on the automotive sector. It depended on funding from programmes with industry partners or with government backing, supplemented by a one-off licence fee from Suzuki for £45m. In order to reduce the reliance on the automotive sector, where volume revenues were dependent on the eventual roll-out of refuelling infrastructure, management diversified into the distributed power generation and consumer electronics sectors. This was good in principle, but fuel cell roll-out in the distribution power generation sector was delayed because the time taken to secure approvals related to the launch customer affected funding. In addition, the B2C launch of the company’s own hand-held charger product did not deliver the expected commercial traction. Incoming CEO Martin Bloom has recently refined the diversification strategy so it is now focused on sales of commercially ready B2B products. In the process he has reduced cash burn significantly. Our model estimates that, following the issue of convertible loan notes and subscription in June 2016, the group has sufficient funds to support activities under the new strategy throughout FY17, but may need additional finance in FY18, depending on the rate and nature of sales growth.

Valuation: Product sales to drive a re-rating

Our analysis indicates that IEH is trading on prospective (FY17e) EV/sales multiples that are towards the lower end of the range for its peers (1.9x vs 0.5-6.4x). This suggests potential for share re-rating if the revised strategy delivers meaningful product sales. We note the possible dilutive impact of the convertible loan notes issued in June 2016 (£30.0m convertible at 8p/share at any time up to 17 May 2019).

Sensitivities: Commercial risk rather than technology

As the fuel cell stacks and associated system hardware have already been proven in active deployments, there is relatively little technical risk. However, IEH has yet to prove that the recently restructured and strengthened commercial team is able to identify demand and win orders for significant volumes of products. There are already several competitors offering PEM technology for telecom towers, which is the most immediate market. Penetration of the UAV and consumer electronic device markets depends on OEM commitment, which is outside IEH’s control and would be adversely affected by the development of higher-capacity rechargeable batteries. The production line at Loughborough has not been used for more than prototype production so far.


Company description: Market ready technology

Intelligent Energy (IEH) designs and develops power-dense hydrogen fuel cell technologies intended for lower-cost, mass-market applications. Following the appointment of Martin Bloom as CEO in June 2016 and an extensive restructuring, the core UK business is now focused on air cooled fuel cell commercial opportunities with a power requirement of sub 1W to 20kW. The emphasis is on applications that are ready for commercial deployment. These include distributed power generation for “always-on” infrastructure and range extenders for drones. IEH continues to work on funded development programmes with the potential to deliver additional commercial products in the medium term. These include a longstanding programme with Suzuki and one with an emerging smartphone OEM to develop compact embedded energy packs. Although management has suspended further work on evaporatively cooled technology, the group retains a significant number of patents and other IP relating to this, which may be monetised in future. Management is evaluating options for the group’s India telecom tower power management activity.

IEH listed on the London Stock Exchange in July 2014, raising £55m (gross) at 340p/share. In June 2016, the group secured £27.2m net funding through the issue of convertible loan notes at a conversion price of 8p/share and a subscription for shares, also at 8p/share.

The group currently employs 136 people, excluding around 60 in the Indian power management operation. The main operating site is in Loughborough with ancillary presence in London, France, India, Japan, Singapore and the US. The fuel cells are currently manufactured on a pilot production line in Loughborough. There is a similar production line at the 50/50 JV with Suzuki, which is currently being used by IEH’s Japanese partner.

Refining the strategy

Until 2013, the group generated all of its revenues from joint development agreements and technology licensing arrangements with major car manufacturers. However, since licence fees are inherently lumpy in nature and volume adoption of fuel cells in vehicles is not expected to occur until the end of the decade, management at that time decided to take control of its own destiny by diversifying into the distributed power and generation and consumer electronics sectors. In both of these markets, having a power-dense fuel cell technology is a valuable differentiator. The recently revised strategy instigated by incoming CEO Martin Bloom refines this approach by focusing on applications where the group can deliver commercial product quickly. The programme to reduce cash burn and ultimately take the group to profitability is based on three key points:

Identifying those products that are closest to the market and where markets are likely to scale rapidly. This precept informed the decision to withdraw from evaporatively cooled related development activity as this was only partially funded by partners.

Getting products to market more quickly. All current products are based on a common air cooled technology. The divisional structure has been replaced with a commercial and delivery platform common to all product types. The former operations department has been replaced by a new Product Delivery function.

Selling products more effectively. The existing commercial activity has been reorganised into a single team focused on distributed energy and back-up power. New people have been brought in. Resources in China and Japan, where conditions are favourable for the widespread adoption of fuel cell technology, have been strengthened.

Collectively, these actions have reduced the number of staff (excluding the power management team in India) from 355 in September 2015 to 136 currently. Adjusted EBITDA losses have been cut from c £3.5m/month to c £1.1m/month.

Management changes

Martin Bloom became interim CEO in June 2016, having previously served as a non-executive director since 2012. Martin has almost 40 years of experience in strategic partnering, technology commercialisation and business strategy. He has built businesses in the US, Europe and China. As chairman of ReneSola, a position he held between September 2006 and March 2016, he helped the company list on AIM and the New York Stock Exchange, steering it through rapid growth to become a $1.5bn+ turnover company in just a few years. He has been chairman of the board of directors of MayAir Group, an AIM-listed Malaysian air purification company, since May 2015, continues as a non-executive director of ReneSola and was a non-executive director of Starcom, an AIM-listed asset tracking company between January 2013 and October 2015. His position became permanent in November 2016.

Technology: Industry-leading power densities

A fuel cell combines hydrogen fuel with oxygen in the air to produce water, electrical energy and heat energy. IEH develops proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cells. These are robust, operate at temperatures below 100°C, are capable of delivering the highest power density and are suitable for a range of outputs between a few watts and hundreds of kilowatts. PEM technology is therefore suitable for consumer electronics devices, drones, portable power generation equipment and motorcycles where, helpfully for IEH, customers are prepared to pay a premium for compactness. By contrast, power density is less important for buses and trucks and household or utility-scale power generation.

The key problem in designing fuel cells is the removal of the heat energy produced during the reaction of hydrogen and oxygen. If the heat is not removed the platinum catalyst clumps together and becomes less effective, the membrane degrades and production of electricity becomes less efficient. In air-cooled systems, the heat is removed by the air flowing through the stack. This contrasts with the more complex evaporatively cooled systems where the heat is removed by the water generated from the reaction between hydrogen fuel and oxygen. In both technologies, the flow of fuel and coolant is controlled in real time using proprietary algorithms that enable IEH to achieve higher power densities than competitive devices. The core technology is configurable into a wide range of power outputs by adjusting the number of cells in each stack and combining individual stacks in parallel. As one underlying design is suitable for multiple markets, the group not only optimises its return on the design investment, but will also potentially achieve economies of scale faster, accelerating adoption of fuel cell technology.

The air-cooled systems are available in 1W to 20kW formats ranging from portable devices to diesel generator replacement applications, motorcycles and small cars and range extenders for larger cars. Management notes that the stacks offer a power density that is significantly superior to the competition with regards to both kW/kg and kW/litre. The development work on drones involving the substitution of lighter materials in the stack has resulted in lightweight variants of both the low and higher power systems that output two to three time as much power per kilogram as the standard stacks.

Design for volume manufacture

IEH has always developed its technology with a view to eventually creating a product that would have a total cost of ownership (including fuel costs) comparable to conventional power sources at volume. It has therefore focused on low part count design and on materials that are amenable to high-volume automated manufacture. Importantly, while competitors typically use graphite for the flow field plates, IEH uses stainless steel. This material was originally chosen because it is resistant to corrosion, so the resultant stacks are more reliable than graphite based ones. In addition it can readily be formed into the advanced architectures required for heat removal using standard automotive production techniques such as sheet metal pressing. These techniques are very scalable, giving a rapid route to cost-effective volume manufacturing. IEH has already set up a ready-to-scale, semi-automated production facility at Loughborough. This is replicated in Japan at the manufacturing JV formed with Suzuki in 2013.

Exhibit 1: Fuel cell structure

Source: Intelligent Energy

Extensive patent portfolio

The commercial offer is underpinned by an extensive IP portfolio of more than 1,000 granted or pending patents. These relate to the fuel cell power technologies, the components surrounding the fuel cell stack, and the control technology for the stack and how it is manufactured.

Commercial applications

As noted earlier, IEH is focusing on commercial opportunities with a power requirement of up to 20kW, especially those where space is at a premium. Management intends the group to focus more on the sale of fuel cell stacks, rather than complete systems. These stacks can be integrated into complete systems by OEMs who will bear the sales and marketing costs. (This removes one of the key problems with the introduction IEH’s Upp device.) This model appears viable because historically IEH received enquiries from third parties who were interested in this type of business model, but were not pursued at the time because of the preference formerly for the JDA, licensing and royalty route. Short term, IEH will also sell complete power generation systems for telecoms towers. As a working system for this application is already available, sales may be generated relatively quickly. The system will also demonstrate what is possible, helping to seed the market. To start with, IEH intends to manufacture product in house (thus controlling quality and eliminating the other issue associated with the Upp) using existing capacity. As production volumes increase, it is possible that IEH will migrate to a licensing/royalty model, but this is not modelled in our estimates.

Stationary power

Banks, telecommunication tower operators, hospitals, educational and penal establishments and waste water treatment sites are increasingly deploying fuel cells as primary or back-up power. For these applications the economic cost of not having power, estimated by the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in 2009 at $14.4-173.1/kWh for medium and large commercial and industrial facilities, overrides the higher cost of electricity from fuel cells.

Telecoms tower operators – early adopters

Telecom infrastructure operators have historically installed back-up batteries and diesel-fuelled power generators at the tower sites to ensure continuity of signal transmission and thus protect revenues. Continuity of signal transmission is an issue in both the developing and the developed world. In the developing world the grid does not have sufficient capacity, so power outages occur on a daily basis. In India for example, an estimated 70% of the telecom towers are without grid power for more than eight hours per day. In the developed world, tower operators are more concerned about maintaining transmission following the destruction of power lines during the hurricane season or winter storms. Switching to a hybrid battery/fuel cell back-up system potentially offers a more reliable, compact, quiet and emission-free alternative to using diesel generators. The final three factors are particularly important for towers in residential areas. Moreover, since the number of callouts for repair are reduced, switching to fuel cells may also be more cost-effective.

IEH has a proven solution for this application. Seven systems were installed at GTL sites in north-west India between September and November 2015. Three of these sites are completely off-grid and have therefore used the fuel cells as prime power; the others have used the fuel cells heavily as primary power sources. These systems have shown that they are highly reliable in a wide range of climactic conditions and can be deployed in an environment where local site supervisors may be semi-literate. The systems are very compact. One of IEH’s diesel replacement power systems rated up to 6.0kW fits within a 2m high cabinet. Performance data from this multi-site deployment is a powerful sales tool as IEH’s sales team actively seeks opportunities with tower operators in both the developed and developing worlds, concentrating on territories where bottled hydrogen is readily available. Target regions include India (over 400,000 towers), China and Singapore. The GTL portfolio of 27,000 telecoms towers remains a sizable opportunity for the group.

Exhibit 2: Competitors in stationary power and distributed energy

Company

Details

AFC Energy

Alkaline fuel cells for electricity generation in situations such as waste-to-gas transfer stations where hydrogen is cheaply available (higher output than IEH).

Altergy Systems

Fuel cells providing back-up power for telecoms sites.

Ballard Power Systems

Methanol telecom back-up power business sold in May 2016 but direct hydrogen capability retained and licensed to Guangdong Nation Synergy Hydrogen Power Technology Co.

Ceres Power

Development activity with Cummins Power Generation, Honda and KD Navien.

Electro Power Systems

Fuel cells that consume hydrogen manufactured in situ by its own hydrolysers. Some back-up systems sold to telecoms companies but currently focusing on energy storage systems for utilities.

FuelCell Energy

Higher output distributed power systems fuelled by biogas for utilities, industrial operations, water treatment companies and government organisations.

Heliocentris

Significant presence in the Middle East and Myanmar. Offers integrated energy management systems for telecoms sites. Acquired fuel cell developer FutureE in June 2014 to substitute fuel cells for back-up diesel generators.

Hydrogenics

Focusing on higher-power output systems combined with its own hydrolysers for grid support – fuel cells for back-up power for telecoms sites in its portfolio. It claims these have the best power densities in the industry.

Plug Power

ReliOn division, acquired in April 2014, has sold fuel cells for back-up and grid support applications at over 2,000 locations globally. In January 2015 ReliOn won a contract to supply up to 500 telecoms site in the south-eastern US with back-up power over a five-year period.

SFC Energy

Over 30,000 fuel cells sold to date. Primary market is fuel cell-based hybrid solutions for remote oil and gas installations, but has highlighted telecom towers as a potential target market.

Source: Edison Investment Research

There are several other fuel cell companies already active in this sector (see Exhibit 2). IEH’s experience of operating fuel cells within a power management service offer, together with the relatively compact stack, puts it in a good position.

Distributed energy

Replacing diesel power generators with fuel cells is a key element in reducing emission of nitrogen oxides (NOx). This is becoming increasingly important in urban environments. Cities in North America, Europe and Asia have started to clamp down on NOx emissions from vehicles, but the emissions from static diesel generators as back-up power for infrastructure and buildings and as temporary power for construction sites are also significant. This represents a sizable opportunity for the group. So far, there is little evidence of competitor activity in this sector, although Ceres Power has signed a joint development agreement with Honda, which sells an estimated six million generator sets and power appliances annually. IEH’s compact stack looks a good solution for portable genset substitution.

Fuel cells are also beginning to be deployed as part of hybrid renewable energy systems. Wind and solar power are, by their very nature, intermittent sources of power. This causes problems as the proportion of energy in a grid derived from these sources increases. Fuel cells provide an environmentally acceptable way of balancing demand to supply by converting surplus electrical energy to hydrogen gas, which is stored and then used to power fuel cells when wind or sunlight is in short supply. We believe that much of this energy balancing will be at a utility scale, making it more suitable for competitors with higher output power technology (see Exhibit 2), but IEH’s technology may be suitable for smaller-scale, micro-grid deployments.

Drones

IEH’s power-dense technology is an ideal match for unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). Fuel cells offer extended flight times and quick refuelling compared with lithium-ion batteries. They are particularly suitable for larger drones with heavier payloads used in commercial applications such as surveying, where the curtailed flight times and prolonged refuelling times seriously affect productivity. Fuel cells are also of interest for military UAVs because of their low noise and thermal signature. IEH developed the ultra-light version of its air cooled technology discussed above specifically for this sector. Demonstration stacks for this application weigh between 1.2-1.4kg and output up to 1.5kW. They are used with miniaturise pressurised hydrogen gas cannisters. The technology was demonstrated at the Consumer Electronics Show (CES ) in Las Vegas in January 2016 and the more specialist InterDrone event, also at Las Vegas, in September 2016.

In January 2016 IEH signed a letter of intent with a major drone manufacturer to jointly develop hydrogen fuel cell powered UAVs, focusing on increasing flight time. Although the exact improvements to flight times will not be known until the production drone is finalised, the expectation is that a fuel cell could more than double or even triple the time a drone could remain airborne. In addition, fuel cells would reduce the downtime significantly as re-fuelling takes a matter of minutes. If successful, the development programme may result in a formal commercial arrangement between IEH and the drone manufacturer for roll-out.

There is currently little competition in this sector. Protonex, which was acquired by Ballard in June 2015, has delivered prototype PEM fuel cell propulsion modules to Insitu, a wholly owned subsidiary of The Boeing Company, for use in its ScanEagle UAV. US government clearance in August 2016 creates a path for commercial export and deployment of the technology in a variety of civilian unmanned vehicle applications. Industry analyst BI Intelligence forecasts market growth from $8bn in 2015 to $12bn in 2021.

Automotive

Since IEH has a common platform for its air cooled stacks, it continues to offer these to the automotive sector, where it is suitable for either the primary power source for lighter vehicles such as scooters or as a range extender for battery powered automobiles, enabling them to double their range without compromising payload capability. Its activity in this sector is underpinned by a partnership with Suzuki, which commenced in 2007 with a demonstration of the Crosscage concept motorbike. The relationship continues to be good. Additionally, in March 2015 IEH announced that it was to lead a consortium that includes DHL to develop range extenders for light commercial vehicles. We note that the relationship with Suzuki is of help in gaining acceptance in Japan, which is potentially a large market for IEH fuel cells in a range of applications.

The competition in this sector is relatively limited because of the constraints on size and weight. Horizon Fuel Cell Technologies offers systems with a power output that, like IEH’s air cooled offer, is suitable for use as primary power for lightweight vehicles or as range extenders for battery powered vehicles. Ceres Power recently announced a programme with Nissan to develop SOFC (solid oxide fuel cell) powertrains running off biogas for deployment in Latin America. Ballard Power Systems, Hydrogenics, Plug Power and Proton Power Systems are involved with trucks, trams and materials handling equipment. For these applications, high power density is not so important, nor is the availability of extensive hydrogen refuelling infrastructure, as typically these vehicles return to a depot each evening where refuelling devices may be sited.

Portable power

As smartphones and other mobile devices become more sophisticated they require increasing amounts of power. Battery technology is not keeping up with this. For example a recent review of the iPhone 7 in the Guardian had the tag line “how good can a phone be if the battery doesn't last even a day?” IEH’s miniature fuel stacks, which can be embedded into portable electronic devices, have attracted interest from numerous manufacturers of smartphones and other mobile devices. In November 2015, IEH announced that it had received a letter of intent from an emerging smartphone OEM to create a tailored development and integration programme for a specific smartphone application. In February IEH announced that this relationship had already matured into a Joint development agreement worth £5.25m over 24 months. The development programme builds on Intelligent Energy’s existing prototype smartphone with an embedded fuel cell and may ultimately result in the licensing of Intelligent Energy’s technology. There is little competition in this sector. Neah Power Systems has developed a compact fuel cell that is promoted for use by the military, first responders, consumers and logistics companies to power mobile devices, but the cells do not appear to be small enough to embed within devices.

Evaporatively cooled technology

Management has decided to mothball development of the evaporatively cooled (EC) technology as the air-cooled technology is more mature and has more short-term product revenue opportunities. IEH retains an extensive range of patents and other IP relating to the evaporatively cooled technology, which may be monetised at some point. Hyundai, Kia Motors and the partnership groups of General Motors and Honda; Daimler, Ford and Renault-Nissan; and Toyota and BMW are developing their own fuel cell technology; this leaves a significant number of manufacturers that do not appear to have their own technology and must therefore either develop it or else license the technology from either a competitor (thus eroding key performance differentiators) or a third party. As discussed earlier, the third-party options are limited. IEH would reinstate EC activity if there was adequate funding. We treat this as upside to our estimates.

Sensitivities

The fuel cell stacks for distributed power generation and stationary power applications have already been proven in tower deployments, so there is little technical risk associated with this revenue stream. Competitors such as Ballard and Heliocentris have sold meaningful volumes of units for back-up power, confirming that there is demand. However, IEH has yet to prove that the recently restructured and strengthened commercial team is able to deliver and the pricing structure adopted in our model has yet to be confirmed. There are already several competitors offering PEM technology for telecom towers, which is the most immediate market.

The fuel cell stacks for deployment in drones and mobile electronic devices are derived from the common platform proven in telecoms tower and motive deployments. However, the development programmes are still ongoing (the drone programme is likely to complete before the embedded mobile device programme) so there remains some technical risk for both product categories.

Relying on OEMs to take complete systems to market, as for example in the UAV and consumer electronic device sectors, significantly reduces costs, but means that IEH does not determine whether to launch product or have control over the sales process.

The development of higher-capacity rechargeable batteries would adversely affect adoption of fuel cells in both drones and mobile electronic devices.

The production line at Loughborough has not been used for more than prototype production so far. While management expects that it will be able to deliver the volumes of units assumed in our estimates (several hundred during FY17), this has not been proven and additional staff will need to be recruited and trained to support the growth shown.

Financials: Focus on immediate opportunities

Exhibit 3: Analysis of revenues by activity

FY14

FY15

H116

H216

FY16

FY17e

Revenues from provision of engineering services (£m)

8.6

5.9

3.0

3.7

6.7*

8.5

Revenues from sale of goods (£m)

0.0

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0*

5.0

Revenues from power management services (£m)

5.0

72.2

40.9

44.2

85.1

20.5

Group revenues (£m)

13.6

78.2

43.9

47.9

91.8

34.0

Group adjusted EBITDA (£m) (company presentation)

(52.4)

(46.2)

(21.6)

(11.8)

(33.4)

(12.0)

Source: Intelligent Energy accounts, Edison Investment Research. Note: *Edison estimate of divisional split.

FY16 – divisional analysis

Essential Energy segment in India

Revenues from power management services (referred to by management as Essential Energy in the report and accounts) rose by £12.9m (18%) to £85.1m. The growth reflects a full year of managing GTL’s portfolio of c 27,000 telecoms towers, an increase in the number of network operators using those towers and £2.5m benefit from exchange rate movements. Unfortunately, since the remuneration was still based on the low-margin interim contract, this rise in revenues did not have a positive impact on profits. Adjusted EBITDA losses from the activity remained at FY15 levels (£2.5m).

Fuel Cell Technology segment

Revenues from the provision of engineering services (referred to by management as the Fuel Cell Technology business segment) increased by £0.7m (12%) to £6.7m. Revenues were derived from a mixture of air-cooled joint development and public body funded-related activities, which are inherently variable in nature. There were no revenues attributable to product sales (FY15: £0.1m), although material progress was made on the drone development programme. As product sales ramp up during FY17, these will be included in the Fuel Cell Technology business segment rather than being reported separately. Adjusted EBITDA losses from the Fuel Cell Technology business segment narrowed by £15.0m year-on-year to £31.1m, reflecting the impact of the restructuring programme discussed above.

FY16 – group performance

Group revenues rose by 17% year-on-year, primarily because of the growth in power management revenues. Adjusted group EBITDA losses reduced by £12.8m year-on-year (28%) to £33.4m. EBITDA losses were cut by 9% year-on-year during H116 as a result of reductions in R&D costs, operations and applications engineering expenditure and administrative costs, but still totalled £21.6m. Following the radical restructuring announced in early April and discussed earlier, costs were cut further, resulting in a narrowing of EBITDA losses during H216 to £11.8m. The group exited FY16 with an adjusted EBITDA loss of c £1.1m/month, c £1.6m including cash interest charges and capex.

Reported losses after tax were adversely affected by several non-cash items related to the extensive restructuring programme and widened by £39.9 m to £82.7m. The losses include £26.7m of non-cash related impairments and inventory write-downs, of which £16.9m relates to intangible assets, as well as de-recognition of a £21.9m non-cash accounting entry deferred tax asset. There was also £2.7m in cash restructuring charges.

Strengthened balance sheet

The balance sheet was strengthened in June by the completion of the issue of convertible loan notes and subscription raising £27.2m net. This gave a cash balance of £20.6m at end September 2016, in line with management guidance.

FY17 – focus on commercial outcomes

Funded development programmes

Our model assumes that funding for specific development programmes during FY17 will be similar to that in FY14 and FY16e. We note three significant programmes contributing to the £8.5m total: the long-term programme with Suzuki; the JDA with the emerging smartphone OEM (£5.25m over 24 months from February 2016); and an assumed programme with a major drone manufacturer.

Product sales

Our model assumes £5.0m of product sales during FY17, generating 30% gross margin (Ballard’s Fuel Cell Services and Products activities realised 29% gross margin during Q216.) This represents several hundred units, which management notes can be supplied from existing manufacturing capacity. Management has not provided any guidance on average pricing, as stacks for drones are expected to command a premium compared to telecoms back-up power on a per kW basis. Our February note on Ceres Power states a target price of $5,500 for a c 1kW domestic heat and power system based on fuel cells and an average selling price of $2,000 for a diesel generator replacement. Stacks for specialised applications appear to command much higher prices. Ballard has received a $10m order for 33 systems for deployments in buses. Assuming a meaningful proportion of UAV stacks in the mix, our £5.0m revenue target appears feasible. We expect that deliveries will be skewed towards H2, as it will take time for the sales team to progress through the complete cycle.

Power management services

IEH became involved in the provision of power management services with the intention of accelerating the take-up of fuel cells for telecoms tower back-up power. While the premise was sound, delays in initially agreeing long-term contracts, securing regulatory approval and prolonged financing discussions has meant that the relationship has been based on an interim agreement delivering minimal gross margins, rather than progressing to a long-term agreement generating higher margins. We believe that it is unlikely that IEH will continue to provide power management services under this interim agreement for much longer. As discussed above, the relationship is no longer needed as a route to penetrate the telecoms tower sector. If the ongoing discussions with GTL and financial backers are resolved successfully, IEH’s power management activity is expected to become a separate entity in which IEH holds a minority stake. Revenues attributable to the entity will not be consolidated as part of group revenues, and IEH’s share of the potential profits from this business would be recognised separately from group operating profits. If the discussions are not resolved successfully, we expect that this activity, remaining as it does on the interim agreement with minimal gross margins, will be terminated. Our model assumes that the decision will be made one way or the other fairly soon, so we include one quarter of revenues from this activity (£34.0m), no gross profit and £0.25m of indirect costs. This approach treats any potential profits from the formation of a new entity as upside.

Enough cash to sustain modest growth in FY17e

We base our cost structure for FY17 on the FY16 exit run rates noted by management of adjusted EBITDA losses of £1.1m/month. This includes funding from ongoing development activities but excludes the Indian power management activity. Overlaying this run rate with £1.5m gross profit from product sales and £0.25m indirect costs in India gives an adjusted EBITDA total loss of £12.0m. Our model shows that the cash raised in June 2016 will be sufficient to support the growth in commercial products expected for FY17. Working capital requirements are only £0.2m because IEH intends to manufacture once orders have been received. The manufacturing capacity is already in place, IEH is not capitalising any R&D and has some stock of materials to hand, reducing cash consumption.

The cash balance is expected to reduce to £4.7m by the year end. Whether additional finance will be required during FY18 depends on how quickly product sales ramp up and the nature of the sales. Management does not expect IEH to be cash-positive by the end of FY17 on a run rate basis. Funding will be required if product sales remain at FY17 levels. It may also be required to support working capital requirements if product sales grow very rapidly. Given the uncertainty regarding the pace and nature of revenues during FY18, we are not issuing any estimates beyond FY17. We will revisit our forecasts when more information is available on product roll-out.

Valuation

Exhibit 4: Prospective EV/sales multiples for listed peers

Company

Market cap

Historic EV/S

Current EV/S

Pre-commercial

AFC Energy

£68m

29.4x

-

Ceres Power Holdings

£75m

78.9x

41.8x

Commercial

Ballard Power Systems Inc

£269m

5.4x

3.7x

FuelCell Energy Inc

£82m

0.4x

0.5x

Hydrogenics

£45m

0.9x

1.1x

ITM Power

£49m

23.8x

6.4x

Plug Power Inc

£217m

2.1x

2.2x

SFC Energy AG

£19m

0.5x

0.5x

Intelligent Energy
(excluding Power Management revenues)

£25m

3.8x

1.9x

Intelligent Energy
(excluding Power Management revenues) – all convertible loan notes converting

£70m

10.6x

5.2x

Source: Bloomberg, Edison Investment Research. Note: Prices at 18 November 2016. All EVs are calculated based on last reported net debt or cash.

Any multiples-based analysis using listed fuel cell companies is hampered by the fact that there are no consensus estimates for some peers, and none of the peers is expected to be profitable. There is a wide divergence between multiples for companies such as Ceres Power, which has yet to ship commercial product, and FuelCell Energy, which has multiple units in use in the field. Our analysis strips out the revenues attributable to Intelligent Energy’s Power Management activity, as this currently generates minimal gross margin and is not likely to be part of the group for much longer. Having completed that, an examination of the current year EV/Sales multiples shows that IEH is trading towards the lower end of the range. This indicates potential for share re-rating if successful execution of the revised strategy delivers meaningful product sales from FY17 onwards. The level of product sales expected in our FY17 forecast is modest compared with the size of the market opportunity.

We note the potential impact of the convertible loan notes issued in June 2016. This transaction has secured financing through to FY18, but introduces a source of significant potential dilution. If all of these loan notes are converted to shares, it represents 375m new shares compared with 206m currently in issue. Calculating IEH’s EV/sales multiples with 581m shares in issue gives multiples that are towards the upper end of the range for the peers. If all of the convertible notes issued to Meditor are converted and none of the other convertible loan note holders exercise their conversion rights, Meditor would hold a 69.3% stake in the company. The Rule 9 waiver means that it would not have to purchase the remaining shares, but Meditor would end up with a controlling stake. Meditor has indicated that it would not change the strategy of the company in this event.

Exhibit 5: Financial summary

£m

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017e

Year end 30 September

IFRS

IFRS

IFRS

IFRS

IFRS

PROFIT & LOSS

Revenue

 

 

20.8

13.6

78.2

91.8

34.0

Cost of Sales

(13.5)

(9.9)

(75.9)

(90.0)

(32.5)

Gross Profit

7.3

3.7

2.3

1.8

1.5

EBITDA

 

 

(23.4)

(52.4)

(46.2)

(33.4)

(12.0)

Operating Profit (before amort and except)

 

 

(26.7)

(46.0)

(51.2)

(38.1)

(16.6)

Amortisation of acquired intangibles

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Exceptionals

0.0

(7.1)

(0.3)

(21.6)

(0.5)

Share based payments

(0.0)

(2.6)

(2.3)

(0.2)

0.0

Operating Profit

(26.7)

(55.6)

(53.8)

(59.9)

(17.1)

Net Interest

(0.5)

(4.0)

(1.3)

(2.7)

(3.9)

Share of losses from JVs and exceptionals

(2.5)

0.0

0.7

(2.0)

0.0

Profit Before Tax (norm)

 

 

(29.7)

(58.0)

(51.8)

(42.8)

(20.5)

Profit Before Tax (FRS 3)

 

 

(29.8)

(59.6)

(54.4)

(64.6)

(21.0)

Tax

8.8

11.4

11.6

(18.1)

3.0

Profit After Tax (norm)

(20.9)

(46.6)

(40.2)

(39.0)

(17.5)

Profit after tax (FRS 3)

(21.0)

(48.2)

(42.8)

(82.7)

(18.0)

Average Number of Shares Outstanding (m)

134.4

153.4

188.2

193.3

206.2

EPS – normalised (p)

 

 

(15.6)

(30.4)

(21.4)

(20.2)

(8.5)

EPS – normalised fully diluted (p)

 

 

(15.6)

(30.4)

(21.4)

(13.5)

(2.3)

EPS – (IFRS) (p)

 

 

(15.6)

(31.4)

(22.7)

(42.8)

(8.7)

Dividend per share (p)

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Gross Margin (%)

35.3

27.4

2.9

2.0

4.4

EBITDA Margin (%)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Operating Margin (before GW and except) (%)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

BALANCE SHEET

Fixed Assets

 

 

27.7

37.9

59.8

10.7

8.5

Intangible Assets

13.3

14.7

29.4

7.9

6.8

Tangible Assets

5.3

6.9

8.5

2.8

1.7

Deferred tax assets

9.2

16.3

21.9

0.0

0.0

Current Assets

 

 

46.4

107.5

45.2

33.0

18.4

Stocks

1.5

4.1

5.3

1.6

1.6

Debtors

9.8

11.1

11.5

7.8

9.1

Cash and short-term deposits

31.6

88.9

24.2

20.6

4.7

Current tax assets

3.5

3.4

4.2

3.0

3.0

Current Liabilities

 

 

(8.6)

(17.6)

(14.3)

(8.7)

(9.8)

Creditors

(8.6)

(17.6)

(14.3)

(8.4)

(9.5)

Short term borrowings

0.0

0.0

0.0

(0.3)

(0.3)

Long Term Liabilities

 

 

(21.1)

0.0

(3.0)

(22.8)

(22.8)

Long term borrowings

(18.5)

0.0

0.0

(21.0)*

(21.0)*

Other long term liabilities

(2.6)

0.0

(3.0)

(1.8)

(1.8)

Net Assets

 

 

44.4

127.8

87.7

12.2

(5.8)

CASH FLOW

Operating Cash Flow

 

 

(23.4)

(50.6)

(51.5)

(31.4)

(12.7)

Net Interest

(0.0)

0.3

0.1

(1.1)

(3.9)

Tax

3.3

3.8

4.8

5.1

3.0

Capex

(5.0)

(6.8)

(19.4)

(3.8)

(2.4)

Acquisitions/disposals

0.0

1.1

1.0

0.0

0.0

Equity financing

1.5

108.4

0.2

1.1

0.0

Dividends

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Forex/Other

0.0

(0.0)

0.1

0.1

0.0

Net Cash Flow

(23.6)

56.1

(64.7)

(30.0)

(16.0)

Opening net debt/(cash)

 

 

29.9

(13.1)

(88.9)

(24.2)

0.7

HP finance leases initiated

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Other

66.5

19.7

0.0

5.1

0.0

Closing net debt/(cash)

 

 

(13.1)

(88.9)

(24.2)

0.7

16.7

Source: Company accounts, Edison Investment Research. Note: *Including £20.7m liability of convertible loan notes.

Contact details

Revenue by geography

Charnwood Building, Holywell Park,
Ashby Road,
Loughborough, LE11 3GB
United Kingdom
+44 (0)1509 271271
www.intelligent-energy.com

N/A

Contact details

Charnwood Building, Holywell Park,
Ashby Road,
Loughborough, LE11 3GB
United Kingdom
+44 (0)1509 271271
www.intelligent-energy.com

Revenue by geography

N/A

Management team

Non-Executive Chairman: Paul Heiden

Chief Executive Officer: Martin Bloom

Paul was appointed in September 2012. Former roles include group FD of Rolls-Royce and chief executive of FKI. He is also a non-executive director of London Stock Exchange Group and Meggitt. He has previously been chairman of Talaris Topco, a company owned by the Carlyle Group and United Utilities.

Martin has significant experience in building high-growth technology companies across a range of sectors. He has strong connections in Asia, in particular with Chinese businesses, institutions and government organisations. As chairman of ReneSola, he helped the company to list on AIM and the NYSE, steering it through rapid growth to become a $1.5bn+ turnover company in just a few years. He is currently non-executive chairman of MayAir Group and non-executive director of ReneSola.

Chief Financial Officer: John Maguire

Non-Executive Director: Michael Muller

John was appointed in January 2012. He joined the group from Etisalat Nigeria, where he was CFO of the mobile operator. He was previously CFO at FTSE 250 Thus Group for eight years and before that worked in a number of senior finance positions, including VP of finance for Japan and Asia at Cable & Wireless, based in Tokyo. John is also a non-executive director of Jee, a subsea engineering and training company.

Michael is the chief technology officer of ARM Holdings. He was one of the founding members of ARM when it was created as a joint venture between Apple and Acorn in 1990. He occupied the post of marketing director and changed roles in 1996 to become executive VP of business development, before becoming chief technology officer in 2000.

Management team

Non-Executive Chairman: Paul Heiden

Paul was appointed in September 2012. Former roles include group FD of Rolls-Royce and chief executive of FKI. He is also a non-executive director of London Stock Exchange Group and Meggitt. He has previously been chairman of Talaris Topco, a company owned by the Carlyle Group and United Utilities.

Chief Executive Officer: Martin Bloom

Martin has significant experience in building high-growth technology companies across a range of sectors. He has strong connections in Asia, in particular with Chinese businesses, institutions and government organisations. As chairman of ReneSola, he helped the company to list on AIM and the NYSE, steering it through rapid growth to become a $1.5bn+ turnover company in just a few years. He is currently non-executive chairman of MayAir Group and non-executive director of ReneSola.

Chief Financial Officer: John Maguire

John was appointed in January 2012. He joined the group from Etisalat Nigeria, where he was CFO of the mobile operator. He was previously CFO at FTSE 250 Thus Group for eight years and before that worked in a number of senior finance positions, including VP of finance for Japan and Asia at Cable & Wireless, based in Tokyo. John is also a non-executive director of Jee, a subsea engineering and training company.

Non-Executive Director: Michael Muller

Michael is the chief technology officer of ARM Holdings. He was one of the founding members of ARM when it was created as a joint venture between Apple and Acorn in 1990. He occupied the post of marketing director and changed roles in 1996 to become executive VP of business development, before becoming chief technology officer in 2000.

Principal shareholders

(%)

Meditor European Fund

20.4%

Evolution Placements Corporation

10.7%

GIC Private Limited

10.6%

DNB ASA

6.0%

Norges Bank

5.8%

Yukos International UK BV

5.8%

Bank of Montreal

5.3%

Companies named in this report

AFC Energy (AFC:LN); Ballard Power Systems (BLDP:US); The Boeing Company (BA:US); Ceres Power (CWR:LN) Electro Power Systems SA (EPS:FP); FuelCell Energy Inc (FCEL:US); Heliocentris (H2FA:GR); Hydrogenics Corp. (HYGS:US); Neah Power Systems (NPWS:US); Plug Power Inc. (PLUG:US); Proton Power Systems (PPS:LN); SFC Energy (F3C:GR); Suzuki Motor Corporation (7269:JP); Toyota Motor Corporation (7203:JP).

Edison, the investment intelligence firm, is the future of investor interaction with corporates. Our team of over 100 analysts and investment professionals work with leading companies, fund managers and investment banks worldwide to support their capital markets activity. We provide services to more than 400 retained corporate and investor clients from our offices in London, New York, Frankfurt, Sydney and Wellington. Edison is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Edison Investment Research (NZ) Limited (Edison NZ) is the New Zealand subsidiary of Edison. Edison NZ is registered on the New Zealand Financial Service Providers Register (FSP number 247505) and is registered to provide wholesale and/or generic financial adviser services only. Edison Investment Research Inc (Edison US) is the US subsidiary of Edison and is regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Edison Investment Research Limited (Edison Aus) [46085869] is the Australian subsidiary of Edison and is not regulated by the Australian Securities and Investment Commission. Edison Germany is a branch entity of Edison Investment Research Limited [4794244]. www.edisongroup.com

DISCLAIMER
Copyright 2016 Edison Investment Research Limited. All rights reserved. This report has been commissioned by Intelligent Energy Holdings and prepared and issued by Edison for publication globally. All information used in the publication of this report has been compiled from publicly available sources that are believed to be reliable, however we do not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this report. Opinions contained in this report represent those of the research department of Edison at the time of publication. The securities described in the Investment Research may not be eligible for sale in all jurisdictions or to certain categories of investors. This research is issued in Australia by Edison Aus and any access to it, is intended only for "wholesale clients" within the meaning of the Australian Corporations Act. The Investment Research is distributed in the United States by Edison US to major US institutional investors only. Edison US is registered as an investment adviser with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Edison US relies upon the "publishers' exclusion" from the definition of investment adviser under Section 202(a)(11) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and corresponding state securities laws. As such, Edison does not offer or provide personalised advice. We publish information about companies in which we believe our readers may be interested and this information reflects our sincere opinions. The information that we provide or that is derived from our website is not intended to be, and should not be construed in any manner whatsoever as, personalised advice. Also, our website and the information provided by us should not be construed by any subscriber or prospective subscriber as Edison’s solicitation to effect, or attempt to effect, any transaction in a security. The research in this document is intended for New Zealand resident professional financial advisers or brokers (for use in their roles as financial advisers or brokers) and habitual investors who are “wholesale clients” for the purpose of the Financial Advisers Act 2008 (FAA) (as described in sections 5(c) (1)(a), (b) and (c) of the FAA). This is not a solicitation or inducement to buy, sell, subscribe, or underwrite any securities mentioned or in the topic of this document. This document is provided for information purposes only and should not be construed as an offer or solicitation for investment in any securities mentioned or in the topic of this document. A marketing communication under FCA Rules, this document has not been prepared in accordance with the legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research.
Edison has a restrictive policy relating to personal dealing. Edison Group does not conduct any investment business and, accordingly, does not itself hold any positions in the securities mentioned in this report. However, the respective directors, officers, employees and contractors of Edison may have a position in any or related securities mentioned in this report. Edison or its affiliates may perform services or solicit business from any of the companies mentioned in this report. The value of securities mentioned in this report can fall as well as rise and are subject to large and sudden swings. In addition it may be difficult or not possible to buy, sell or obtain accurate information about the value of securities mentioned in this report. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance. Forward-looking information or statements in this report contain information that is based on assumptions, forecasts of future results, estimates of amounts not yet determinable, and therefore involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of their subject matter to be materially different from current expectations. For the purpose of the FAA, the content of this report is of a general nature, is intended as a source of general information only and is not intended to constitute a recommendation or opinion in relation to acquiring or disposing (including refraining from acquiring or disposing) of securities. The distribution of this document is not a “personalised service” and, to the extent that it contains any financial advice, is intended only as a “class service” provided by Edison within the meaning of the FAA (ie without taking into account the particular financial situation or goals of any person). As such, it should not be relied upon in making an investment decision. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Edison, its affiliates and contractors, and their respective directors, officers and employees will not be liable for any loss or damage arising as a result of reliance being placed on any of the information contained in this report and do not guarantee the returns on investments in the products discussed in this publication. FTSE International Limited (“FTSE”) © FTSE 2016. “FTSE®” is a trade mark of the London Stock Exchange Group companies and is used by FTSE International Limited under license. All rights in the FTSE indices and/or FTSE ratings vest in FTSE and/or its licensors. Neither FTSE nor its licensors accept any liability for any errors or omissions in the FTSE indices and/or FTSE ratings or underlying data. No further distribution of FTSE Data is permitted without FTSE’s express written consent.

Frankfurt +49 (0)69 78 8076 960

Schumannstrasse 34b

60325 Frankfurt

Germany

London +44 (0)20 3077 5700

280 High Holborn

London, WC1V 7EE

United Kingdom

New York +1 646 653 7026

245 Park Avenue, 39th Floor

10167, New York

US

Sydney +61 (0)2 9258 1161

Level 25, Aurora Place

88 Phillip St, Sydney

NSW 2000, Australia

Wellington +64 (0)48 948 555

Level 15, 171 Featherston St

Wellington 6011

New Zealand

Frankfurt +49 (0)69 78 8076 960

Schumannstrasse 34b

60325 Frankfurt

Germany

London +44 (0)20 3077 5700

280 High Holborn

London, WC1V 7EE

United Kingdom

New York +1 646 653 7026

245 Park Avenue, 39th Floor

10167, New York

US

Sydney +61 (0)2 9258 1161

Level 25, Aurora Place

88 Phillip St, Sydney

NSW 2000, Australia

Wellington +64 (0)48 948 555

Level 15, 171 Featherston St

Wellington 6011

New Zealand

Edison, the investment intelligence firm, is the future of investor interaction with corporates. Our team of over 100 analysts and investment professionals work with leading companies, fund managers and investment banks worldwide to support their capital markets activity. We provide services to more than 400 retained corporate and investor clients from our offices in London, New York, Frankfurt, Sydney and Wellington. Edison is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Edison Investment Research (NZ) Limited (Edison NZ) is the New Zealand subsidiary of Edison. Edison NZ is registered on the New Zealand Financial Service Providers Register (FSP number 247505) and is registered to provide wholesale and/or generic financial adviser services only. Edison Investment Research Inc (Edison US) is the US subsidiary of Edison and is regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Edison Investment Research Limited (Edison Aus) [46085869] is the Australian subsidiary of Edison and is not regulated by the Australian Securities and Investment Commission. Edison Germany is a branch entity of Edison Investment Research Limited [4794244]. www.edisongroup.com

DISCLAIMER
Copyright 2016 Edison Investment Research Limited. All rights reserved. This report has been commissioned by Intelligent Energy Holdings and prepared and issued by Edison for publication globally. All information used in the publication of this report has been compiled from publicly available sources that are believed to be reliable, however we do not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this report. Opinions contained in this report represent those of the research department of Edison at the time of publication. The securities described in the Investment Research may not be eligible for sale in all jurisdictions or to certain categories of investors. This research is issued in Australia by Edison Aus and any access to it, is intended only for "wholesale clients" within the meaning of the Australian Corporations Act. The Investment Research is distributed in the United States by Edison US to major US institutional investors only. Edison US is registered as an investment adviser with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Edison US relies upon the "publishers' exclusion" from the definition of investment adviser under Section 202(a)(11) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and corresponding state securities laws. As such, Edison does not offer or provide personalised advice. We publish information about companies in which we believe our readers may be interested and this information reflects our sincere opinions. The information that we provide or that is derived from our website is not intended to be, and should not be construed in any manner whatsoever as, personalised advice. Also, our website and the information provided by us should not be construed by any subscriber or prospective subscriber as Edison’s solicitation to effect, or attempt to effect, any transaction in a security. The research in this document is intended for New Zealand resident professional financial advisers or brokers (for use in their roles as financial advisers or brokers) and habitual investors who are “wholesale clients” for the purpose of the Financial Advisers Act 2008 (FAA) (as described in sections 5(c) (1)(a), (b) and (c) of the FAA). This is not a solicitation or inducement to buy, sell, subscribe, or underwrite any securities mentioned or in the topic of this document. This document is provided for information purposes only and should not be construed as an offer or solicitation for investment in any securities mentioned or in the topic of this document. A marketing communication under FCA Rules, this document has not been prepared in accordance with the legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research.
Edison has a restrictive policy relating to personal dealing. Edison Group does not conduct any investment business and, accordingly, does not itself hold any positions in the securities mentioned in this report. However, the respective directors, officers, employees and contractors of Edison may have a position in any or related securities mentioned in this report. Edison or its affiliates may perform services or solicit business from any of the companies mentioned in this report. The value of securities mentioned in this report can fall as well as rise and are subject to large and sudden swings. In addition it may be difficult or not possible to buy, sell or obtain accurate information about the value of securities mentioned in this report. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance. Forward-looking information or statements in this report contain information that is based on assumptions, forecasts of future results, estimates of amounts not yet determinable, and therefore involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of their subject matter to be materially different from current expectations. For the purpose of the FAA, the content of this report is of a general nature, is intended as a source of general information only and is not intended to constitute a recommendation or opinion in relation to acquiring or disposing (including refraining from acquiring or disposing) of securities. The distribution of this document is not a “personalised service” and, to the extent that it contains any financial advice, is intended only as a “class service” provided by Edison within the meaning of the FAA (ie without taking into account the particular financial situation or goals of any person). As such, it should not be relied upon in making an investment decision. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Edison, its affiliates and contractors, and their respective directors, officers and employees will not be liable for any loss or damage arising as a result of reliance being placed on any of the information contained in this report and do not guarantee the returns on investments in the products discussed in this publication. FTSE International Limited (“FTSE”) © FTSE 2016. “FTSE®” is a trade mark of the London Stock Exchange Group companies and is used by FTSE International Limited under license. All rights in the FTSE indices and/or FTSE ratings vest in FTSE and/or its licensors. Neither FTSE nor its licensors accept any liability for any errors or omissions in the FTSE indices and/or FTSE ratings or underlying data. No further distribution of FTSE Data is permitted without FTSE’s express written consent.

Frankfurt +49 (0)69 78 8076 960

Schumannstrasse 34b

60325 Frankfurt

Germany

London +44 (0)20 3077 5700

280 High Holborn

London, WC1V 7EE

United Kingdom

New York +1 646 653 7026

245 Park Avenue, 39th Floor

10167, New York

US

Sydney +61 (0)2 9258 1161

Level 25, Aurora Place

88 Phillip St, Sydney

NSW 2000, Australia

Wellington +64 (0)48 948 555

Level 15, 171 Featherston St

Wellington 6011

New Zealand

Frankfurt +49 (0)69 78 8076 960

Schumannstrasse 34b

60325 Frankfurt

Germany

London +44 (0)20 3077 5700

280 High Holborn

London, WC1V 7EE

United Kingdom

New York +1 646 653 7026

245 Park Avenue, 39th Floor

10167, New York

US

Sydney +61 (0)2 9258 1161

Level 25, Aurora Place

88 Phillip St, Sydney

NSW 2000, Australia

Wellington +64 (0)48 948 555

Level 15, 171 Featherston St

Wellington 6011

New Zealand

Research: Energy & Resources

Hurricane Energy — Update 23 November 2016

Hurricane Energy

Continue Reading

Subscribe to Edison

Get access to the very latest content matched to your personal investment style.

Sign up for free