Search Follow us
26 July 2017

Alphabet - Other people’s money

. Core businesses showing signs of maturity.

Alphabet reported good Q2 17A results but the fact that it has having to share more of its revenues with third parties is hurting profitability and indicates that growth in its core properties is maturing.
Q2 17A revenues-ex TAC / Adj-EPS were $20.9bn / $8.90 below consensus of $21.2bn / $10.34. While we consider the EU fine to be little more than an annoyance, it is the traffic acquisition cost (TAC) where we have concerns. Over the last 12 months, Google has been forced to pay away more of its revenues to its network members and distribution partners. Google network members are now keeping 72% of their turnover compared to 70% a year ago and distribution partners now get 11% of the revenues that Google generates from their devices compared to 9% a year ago.
The problem here is that this falls straight to the bottom line and looks to have been entirely responsible for the weakening of margins experienced during the quarter.

To a certain degree, what Alphabet is doing is buying growth in revenues and paying for it with lower profitability. This is exactly what Yahoo did much more aggressively prior to its acquisition by Verizon and it was able to mask a decline in its core business by buying in revenues from elsewhere. It implies that monetisation of its own properties and content such as search, mail, maps is starting to hit their capacity ceilings, leaving the company needing to find more growth from third parties. In this regard, the star of the quarter was YouTube which now has 1.5bn MaU with a staggering average engagement time of 60 minutes per day. YouTube is the main home of the alternative media which continues to gain substantial traction across the world as well as the place to go to learn how to do almost anything. YouTube has also seen very high growth of viewing from regular TV screens and is gradually making the move into traditional entertainment.
Machine learning and AI are found everywhere in Google’s products and given its lead here, it has the ability to make its services more useful and more intuitive than the competing services of other ecosystems.

Hence, the outlook remains pretty good for Alphabet but the underlying growth in the core business looks like it is maturing. Hence, profit growth could lag revenue growth as margins come under pressure from increasing TAC leading to more disappointment. We remain pretty cautious on Alphabet overall as the share price has more than kept up with the growth the company has enjoyed over the last 24 months. We still prefer Tencent, Baidu and Microsoft.

Disclaimer - Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Inherent in any investment is the potential for loss. This material is being provided for informational purposes only and nothing herein constitutes investment, legal, accounting or tax advice, or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold a security. This document may contain materials from third parties, which are supplied by companies that are not affiliated with Edison Investment Research. Edison Investment Research has not been involved in the preparation, adoption or editing of such third-party materials and does not explicitly or implicitly endorse or approve such content. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. It should not be assumed that any investments in securities, companies, sectors or markets identified and described were or will be profitable. All information is current as of the date of publication and is subject to change without notice. While based on sources believed reliable, we do not represent this material as accurate or complete. Any views or opinions expressed may not reflect those of the firm as a whole. Edison Investment Research does not engage in investment banking, market making or asset management activities of any securities. The material has not been prepared in accordance with the legal requirements designed to promote the independence or objectivity of investment research.