Search Follow us
6 March 2017 · 2 min read

Digital assistants – Man and dog

Google Assistant and Baidu Duer are miles ahead of everything else that is being offered including Alexa, Siri and Cortana… Google has a vastly superior product but Alexa is much better at controlling the smart home, albeit with an awful user experience.

Late-comers have very little chance. The latest craze to hit the mobile industry is digital assistants where every man and his dog is now building one to try and drive engagement through the ecosystem. LINE is the latest entrant with its offering called Clova but just like everyone else, LINE is going to find that digital assistants are fiendishly difficult because they require top notch artificial intelligence to power them. To make life even more difficult, digital assistants suffer from a chicken and egg problem where they need usage to improve because its with usage data that they can improve. The problem is that no one will use them if they are not already very good meaning they will be unable to gather the data they need to get to level of quality where users will engage with them.
LINE is an instant messaging company that has done an excellent job of monetising messaging through the sale of stickers and games but needs to find other avenues to keep its growth growing. The problem is that when we look at LINE, we see no AI competence to speak nor any history of it working on AI. The search engines are the leaders in AI, but they are not the leaders because they are the cleverest. They are the leaders because they have doing it the longest.
This is why Google Assistant and Baidu Duer are miles ahead of everything else that is being offered including Alexa, Siri and Cortana. Now that Google Assistant is being rolled out onto every Android phone that has Marshmallow, Nougat and above, many of the others have very little chance at all. Siri will continue to live on iOS devices but the real battle will be between Google and Amazon for the home speaker. Here Google has a vastly superior product but Alexa is much better at controlling the smart home, albeit with an awful user experience. This is because Amazon has done a great job at getting smart home developers on board whereas Google has been very late in even making the API available.
Amazon has around 8m Alexa enabled devices in the hands of users whereas Google has just over 0.5m. Consequently, Google is at risk of losing to Amazon but the shock of seeing itself wiped out at CES has shaken it from its stupor. Consequently, LINE, Huawei, Samsung Viv, JD.com Ding Dong, SK Tel Ding Dong, Sony and so on have very little chance and would be best served by doing a deal with one of strong ones rather than wasting shareholder’s money.”

Disclaimer - Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Inherent in any investment is the potential for loss. This material is being provided for informational purposes only and nothing herein constitutes investment, legal, accounting or tax advice, or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold a security. This document may contain materials from third parties, which are supplied by companies that are not affiliated with Edison Investment Research. Edison Investment Research has not been involved in the preparation, adoption or editing of such third-party materials and does not explicitly or implicitly endorse or approve such content. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. It should not be assumed that any investments in securities, companies, sectors or markets identified and described were or will be profitable. All information is current as of the date of publication and is subject to change without notice. While based on sources believed reliable, we do not represent this material as accurate or complete. Any views or opinions expressed may not reflect those of the firm as a whole. Edison Investment Research does not engage in investment banking, market making or asset management activities of any securities. The material has not been prepared in accordance with the legal requirements designed to promote the independence or objectivity of investment research.