Athersys — Update 13 December 2015

Athersys — Update 13 December 2015

Athersys

Analyst avatar placeholder

Written by

Athersys

MultiStem signal in stroke

Company update

Pharma & biotech

14 December 2015

Price

US$1.02

Market cap

US$85m

Net cash ($m) at end Q315

28.3

Shares in issue

83.1m

Free float

98.3%

Code

ATHX

Primary exchange

NASDAQ

Secondary exchange

N/A

Share price performance

%

1m

3m

12m

Abs

(3.8)

(15.0)

(22.1)

Rel (local)

(0.8)

(17.2)

(21.2)

52-week high/low

US$3.3

US$1.0

Business description

Athersys is a US biotech company developing MultiStem (allogeneic, bone marrow-derived stem cells). A Phase II trial with MultiStem in ischemic stroke has completed. A Phase II in AMI is ongoing and a Phase II in ARDS is planned.

Next events

ARDS Phase IIa initiation

Q415/Q116

Japan partnership

H116

AMI data

Q416

Analysts

Maxim Jacobs

+1 646 653 7027

Christian Glennie

+44 (0)20 3077 5727

Athersys is a research client of Edison Investment Research Limited

Athersys is developing off-the-shelf multipotent adult progenitor cells (MAPCs) to treat a variety of indications, with ischemic stroke, acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) the most advanced. The recent Phase II data in stroke indicated strong trends in favor of MultiStem across multiple endpoints, though the study did miss the primary endpoint on an intent-to-treat basis. Clinical trial design changes in future trials should help increase the program’s chance of success. We value Athersys at $4.08 per share.

Year end

Revenue ($m)

PBT*
($m)

EPS*
($)

DPS
($)

P/E
(x)

Yield
(%)

12/13

2.4

(24.4)

(0.42)

0.0

N/A

N/A

12/14

1.6

(28.9)

(0.37)

0.0

N/A

N/A

12/15e

1.7

(28.0)

(0.34)

0.0

N/A

N/A

12/16e

4.2

(26.5)

(0.31)

0.0

N/A

N/A

Note: *PBT and EPS are normalized, excluding intangible amortization, exceptional items and share-based payments.

A novel and differentiated approach

Athersys is developing allogeneic (off-the-shelf), multipotent adult progenitor cells (MAPCs), derived from adult bone marrow. MAPCs are highly proliferative, enabling the production of millions of clinical doses from a single adult donor. The cells can be frozen and stably stored for at least seven years. Dosage can also be significantly higher than mesenchymal stem cells (MSC), with 1.2bn cells administered in a single dose.

Stroke trial provided a positive signal despite issues

The 126-patient Phase II MultiStem trial in ischemic stroke showed the product had strong trends across multiple endpoints, though it missed the primary endpoint. With an annual incidence of >2.2m in the US, EU and Japan and only one FDA-approved treatment, which only a small fraction of patients are able to receive, there is a large unmet need.

New Japan partnership could help validate product

In October, Chugai and Athersys decided to end their collaboration to develop MultiStem in Japan. However, Athersys already has a letter of intent with another Japanese company to re-partner the product. This new partnership could potentially be more lucrative as it would include areas beyond stroke and also provide validation as it would come after analysis of the Phase II data.

Valuation: $4.08 per basic share

We have increased our fair value to $340m (vs $256m) or $4.08 per share (vs $3.09) as we increased our pricing assumptions due to extremely lucrative reimbursement decisions for recently approved cell-based products in Japan. This was somewhat mitigated by pushing back the expected launch dates for the stroke and AMI programs by a year.

Investment summary

Company description: Multiple opportunities

Athersys was established in 1995 and listed in 2007 through a reverse-merger, immediately raising $65m through the sale of 13m shares at $5.00. At 30 September 2015, Athersys had an accumulated deficit of $306m. The company is based in Cleveland, Ohio (with additional facilities in Leuven, Belgium), has 57 full-time employees, and is focused on developing its MultiStem product (allogeneic stem cells from adult bone marrow donors) for multiple indications, including ischemic stroke, AMI and ARDS.

We believe that Athersys will initiate a Phase IIb trial in ischemic stroke next year to confirm the signal seen in the initial Phase II data, as it did not meet the pre-defined primary endpoint on an intent-to-treat basis. With an annual incidence of >2.2m in the US, EU and Japan and only one FDA-approved treatment, tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA), which needs to be administered within 3-4.5 hours of a stroke, there is a large unmet medical need. Due to a projected 36-hour dosing window, MultiStem could potentially be a major improvement over the current standard of care as the vast majority of patients (≥95% according to the company) are admitted to the hospital by this time point. Enrollment in AMI is ongoing with Phase II data expected late next year. A Phase IIa trial of MultiStem for the treatment of ARDS is in the process of being initiated.

Valuation: Upside potential

We have increased our fair value to $340m (vs $256m) or $4.08 per share (vs $3.09) as we modestly increased our pricing assumptions due to extremely lucrative reimbursement decisions for recently approved cell-based products in Japan. This was somewhat mitigated by pushing back the expected launch dates for the stroke and AMI programs by a year. The bulk of the value of the company (~60%) comes from the stroke program, which could have peak sales of $3.6bn worldwide (which is higher than our previous estimate of $2.8bn due to higher pricing assumptions). Further data from the stroke trial as well as the potential for partnerships in the stroke program could help serve as catalysts for shares.

Sensitivities: Clinical development risks dominate

Athersys is subject to the risks typically associated with biotech company drug development, including the possibility of unfavorable outcomes in clinical trials and regulatory reviews, success of competitors and commercial decisions by partners or potential partners. While the MultiStem Phase II data in stroke had strong trends across multiple endpoints, much of the positive data came via a post-hoc analysis. Plus, as this was a small trial, the data still need to be validated with further clinical study. The track record of R&D in stroke is extremely poor so this is a particularly high-risk indication, although MultiStem’s mechanism and dosing in a wider therapeutic window than conventional drugs could address prior challenges. AMI and ARDS are also high-risk programs as we have little/no data related to MultiStem’s efficacy in those areas.

Financials: Partnerships could help lower financing needs

Athersys held $28.5m in cash at the end of Q315 and based on the current cash burn rate (~$6-7m per quarter) it faces a fresh financing requirement by mid-2016. We currently expect the company to raise $20m in 2016 and $30m in 2017 ($150m total prior to profitability in 2020); however, these requirements, as well as subsequent dilution, may be lessened through partnerships for MultiStem in Japan and elsewhere. Currently we are showing this funding requirement as illustrative long-term debt in the model. If these become equity raises, there would be significant dilution, especially at current levels.

MultiStem in multiple indications

Athersys is focused on developing its MultiStem product (allogeneic stem cells from adult bone marrow donors) for multiple indications, including ischemic stroke, AMI and ARDS (see Exhibit 1). We currently believe that the company will initiate a Phase IIb trial in ischemic stroke sometime next year to confirm the signal seen in the initial Phase II data. Enrollment in AMI is ongoing with Phase II data expected late next year. The ARDS program is expected to enter the clinic shortly.

Exhibit 1: Athersys clinical pipeline

Product

Indication

Status

Next milestone

Notes

MultiStem

Ischemic stroke

126-patient Phase II trial completed. Predefined primary endpoint missed on an intent-to-treat basis.
Expect clarity on next steps in coming months.

Potential partnerships and increased visibility on development plan.

Already has a letter of intent from a new potential Japanese partner (to replace the prior Chugai partnership) for a multi-indication deal. Advanced discussions also ongoing with multiple other companies.

MultiStem

AMI

90-pt Phase II trial ongoing.

Complete enrollment around middle of 2016 with data in Q416.

Data from Phase I indicate potential benefit at the 50m cell dose level.

MultiStem

ARDS

Preparing to initiate Phase IIa trial.

Initiation of Phase IIa trial shortly.

Awarded a £2m grant to fund the trial by Innovate UK.

Source: Athersys

The MultiStem approach

Stem cell research and the potential translational application of adult stem cells have advanced significantly in recent years. Numerous clinical studies have been conducted to investigate the efficacy of various types of stem cells to treat a range of indications, such as immune disorders, neurodegenerative and cardiovascular disease, bone and cartilage repair, and Type 1 diabetes. The development of MSCs, multipotent stromal cells that can differentiate into a variety of cell types, has been the most successful so far, thanks to the approval of Prochymal, an MSC-based product, in various geographies, most recently Japan.

Athersys has developed an MSC-like early progenitor stem cell type referred to as MAPCs. These are bone-marrow-derived, non-hematopoietic adherent cells, developed using a technology acquired from the University of Minnesota in 2003. Derived from bone marrow tissue extracted from healthy, consenting adult donors, MAPCs are manufactured according to proprietary isolation and expansion protocols.1 One of the key features of MAPCs is their proliferative capacity, such that cells can undergo extensive expansion in vitro, with more than 60 population doublings before senescence. This allows the creation of a master and working cell banks as production intermediates. The current manufacturing process is based on clinical doses generated at about PD28 (master cell bank) or PD38 (working cell bank) that enables the production of millions of clinical doses from a single donor. So far, this production capacity is significantly higher than has been achieved with other stem cell products, and could become an important factor when considering the commercial viability of stem cells. These cells can also be cryogenically preserved and the current validated shelf life is at least seven years.

  Boozer S, et al. 2009. Global Characterization and Genomic Stability of Human MultiStem, A Multipotent Adult Progenitor Cell. J Stem Cells. 2009; 4 (1): 17-28.

The end result is an allogeneic (off-the-shelf) product without the need for tissue matching or immune suppression, allowing the product to be used at the time of need (important for urgent medical need indications such as ischemic stroke). The consistency, quality and non-immunogenic nature of these MAPCs allows for significantly higher doses than most MSCs; for example, in the Phase II stroke study, up to 1.2bn cells can be administered in a single IV infusion, whereas the maximum MSC doses are around 400m cells. Yet even at these high doses, the cells do not appear to become a permanent transplant and are cleared from the body over time. Aside from IV infusion, MAPCs can also be administered locally, through a catheter, injection, matrix or implant. MAPCs also appear to be more effective at inducing blood vessel formation in certain models.

Although MAPCs and MSCs are similar in terms of certain immunosuppression mechanisms,2 particularly in T-cell suppression, MAPCs display some important differences. MAPCs tend to be smaller and more uniform than MSCs and appear to be trapped less in the lungs, a key obstacle for stem cell delivery.3 MAPCs have been shown to suppress proinflammatory cytokines (TNFα, IFNγ), while up-regulating certain antiinflammatory cytokines (IL10, TGFβ, IL4). A number of animal model experiments, using TNFα stimulation, show that MAPCs inhibit upregulation of key receptors (eg cell surface adhesion molecules, ICAM, VCAM, Eselectin) on human aortic endothelial cells (HAECs), while MSCs have limited to no effect.

  Jacobs S, et al. 2013. Immunological characteristics of human mesenchymal stem cells and multipotent adult progenitor cells. Immunol Cell Biol. 2013 January; 91(1): 32–39.

  Fischer UM, et al. 2009. Pulmonary passage is a major obstacle for intravenous stem cell delivery: the pulmonary first-pass effect. Stem Cells Dev. 2009 Jun;18(5): 683-92.

Stroke: Time is brain

Ischemic stroke occurs as a result of an obstruction in a blood vessel supplying blood to the brain. It accounts for approximately 87% of all stroke cases, estimated at over 2.2m cases in the US, EU and Japan, according to Datamonitor. In terms of prevalence, 6.6m (2.6% of the adult population) people in the US have had a stroke though the true number may be much higher year.4 In the REGARDS study of 18,462 persons, 17.8% of those >45 years of age reported having had symptoms of a stroke.5 Diabetes, cigarette smoking, prior atrial fibrillation and prior cardiovascular disease are key risk factors for stroke (see Exhibit 2). The mortality rate is estimated at 16-27% though certain regions seem to be more affected than others (Exhibit 3) and it is likely higher for more severe strokes. Also, a very high percentage of people have permanent disability post-stroke (eg 35-40%6 of elderly patients become dependent on other people to function) leading to significant physical, occupational and rehabilitative therapy costs. Acute treatment is currently limited to the use of thrombolytic agents, particularly tissue plasminogen activators (t-PAs), which need to be administered within three to four hours of the stroke. This restricts the use of t-PAs to just 5-8% of treatable patients.

  Mozaffarian,D, et al.2015. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2015 Update. Circulation. 2015;131:e29-E322

  Howard VJ, et al. 2006. High prevalence of stroke symptoms among persons without a diagnosis of stroke or transient ischemic attack in a general population. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2006 Oct 9;166(18):1952-8

  Varona et al, Stroke Research and Treatment, Vol. 2011, Article ID 879817

Exhibit 2: Stroke risk by risk factor

Exhibit 3: Stroke death rates (darker is higher)

Source: AHA. Note: Group A=BP 95-105. B=BP 138-148. C=BP 138-148+diabetes. D=BP 138-148+diabetes+smoking. E=138-148+BP+diabetes+smoking+AFIB. F=BP 138-148+BP+diabetes+smoking+AFIB+cardiovascular disease.

Source: AHA. Note: Darkest color represents 100-300 per 100,000 death rate.

Exhibit 2: Stroke risk by risk factor

Source: AHA. Note: Group A=BP 95-105. B=BP 138-148. C=BP 138-148+diabetes. D=BP 138-148+diabetes+smoking. E=138-148+BP+diabetes+smoking+AFIB. F=BP 138-148+BP+diabetes+smoking+AFIB+cardiovascular disease.

Exhibit 3: Stroke death rates (darker is higher)

Source: AHA. Note: Darkest color represents 100-300 per 100,000 death rate.

Alteplase gained FDA approval in 1996 and subsequent attempts by multiple large pharma and biotech companies to develop new treatments for stroke have been unsuccessful. As such, stroke is widely regarded as a high-risk area of development.

An alphabet soup of metrics

There are quite a few measures that are used to judge the severity of stroke and the efficacy of therapy. Hence, to interpret the results of the MultiStem (or any) stroke trial, it is important to know what each of the different measures mean. One of the key measures of neurological impairment is the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), which has been shown to be a strong predictor of patient outcomes post-stroke (see Exhibit 4). It measures 11 items (eg level of consciousness/awareness, body movement issues) and the output is a score between 0-42 (higher integers signify a more severe stroke).

Exhibit 4: NIHSS correlation with outcomes at day seven and day 30

Source: Adams HP et al, Neurology July 1, 1999 vol. 53 No.1 126

Another measure is the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), which is more of an overall disability score ranging from 0-6. It is not terribly sensitive and there are big differences between the different scores (see Exhibit 5), but it is used regularly in clinical trials to judge functional outcomes.

Exhibit 5: Modified Rankin Scale scores

Source: Banks et al., Stroke, 2007 March;38(3):1091-6

The Barthel Index is also a widely-used scale that judges the ability of patients to function in activities of daily living through questions on bowel/bladder control, grooming, feeding, bathing etc. In total, 10 items are scored with each item scored in five-point increments for a total potential score of 100, which signifies no disability at all (see Exhibit 6).

Exhibit 6: Barthel Index interpretation

Score

Interpretation

80-100

Independent

60-79

Requires minimal help

40-59

Partially dependent

20-39

Very dependent

<20

Totally dependent

Score

80-100

60-79

40-59

20-39

<20

Interpretation

Independent

Requires minimal help

Partially dependent

Very dependent

Totally dependent

Source: National Institutes of Health

As the various scales measure different items, it is common in stroke trials to look at multiple scales to determine a therapy’s efficacy. Hence, in the trials run by Athersys for MultiStem in stroke, a 'global recovery' at day 90 was judged as occurring if the mRS was less than or equal to two, there was a greater than or equal to 75% improvement in the NIHSS and the Barthel Index was greater than or equal to 95. An 'excellent outcome' was judged to occur with a mRS of one or less, NIHSS of one or less and a Barthel Index of 95 or more – a very high hurdle requiring almost no disability or signs of stroke to be achieved.

The MultiStem results in stroke

The Phase II study with MultiStem in the semi-acute treatment of ischemic stroke (within the first 48 hours post-stroke) was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted mostly in the US (27 clinical sites), with some recruitment in the UK (six sites). After an initial safety/dose selection (400-1,200m cells) phase involving 16 patients, the main efficacy phase included 118 patients; the full evaluable patient population reached 126 after including eight patients from the first cohort; 65 patients received high-dose (1,200m cells) MultiStem IV infusion and 61 patients were given a placebo infusion instead.

In April, the company disclosed that the Phase II study failed to reach its primary endpoint, but that in patients who had been dosed with MultiStem within 36 hours of their stroke there were strong trends and statistical significance across a number of endpoints (as a reminder, the current standard of care, tPA, must be administered in a 3-4.5-hour window post-stroke, limiting its use to 5-8% of stroke patients). Originally, the inclusion criteria stipulated that only those who were treated within 36 hours of their stroke could be included and anyone who received both tPA and mechanical reperfusion therapy would be excluded. However, to accelerate enrolment (which was partially slowed as a result of hospital logistical issues, which we discuss later), Athersys allowed patients to be treated up to 48 hours post-stroke and allowed patients who received both tPA and mechanical reperfusion into the trial.

In its Q215 earnings release, Athersys provided additional data regarding MultiStem on an intent-to-treat basis, as well as a review of MultiStem’s efficacy with those patients who would have met the original inclusion criteria (see Exhibit 7).

Exhibit 7: MultiStem Phase II data

At 90 days

Intent-to-treat: 65 MS vs 61P

n(%)

Early MS treatment: 31 MS vs 61 P

n(%)

Post-hoc (excludes tPA + MR): 27 MS vs 52 P n(%)

Global recovery
(patients achieving mRS≤2,
NIHSS∆≥75% and BI≥95)

20 MS vs 15 P (MS: 30.8% v P: 24.6%) (p-value undisclosed)

13 MS vs 15 P (MS: 41.9% vs P: 24.6%) (p=0.08)

12 MS vs 9 P (MS: 44.4% v P: 17.3%) (p<0.01)

Excellent outcome
(mRS≤1, NIHSS≤1 and BI≥95)

10 MS vs 4 P (MS: 15.4% vs P: 6.6%) (p=0.10)

5 MS vs 4 P (MS: 16.1% vs P: 6.6%) (p-value undisclosed)

5 MS vs 2 P (MS: 18.5% v P: 3.8%) (p≤0.05)

Life-threatening AEs/death

7 MS vs 15 P (MS: 10.8% vs P: 24.6%) (p<0.05)

3 MS vs 15 P (MS: 9.7% vs P: 24.6%) (p=0.05)

3 MS vs 14 P (MS: 11.1% v P: 26.9%) (p=0.07)

Secondary infections

24 MS vs 29 P (MS: 36.9% vs P: 47.5%) (p-value undisclosed)

5 MS vs 29 P (MS: 16.1% vs P: 47.5%) (p<0.01)

4 MS vs 28 P (MS: 14.8% v P: 53.8%) (p<0.01)

Hospitalization days

MS: 7.9 d vs P: 9.8 d (p-value undisclosed)

MS: 6.8 d vs P: 9.8 d (p≤0.05)

MS: 6.7 d vs P: 10.3 d (p≤0.05)

Source: Athersys. Note: MS=MultiStem, P=Placebo.

On an intent-to-treat basis there was a 6.2% absolute improvement in the global recovery statistic after 90 days (20 out of 65 patients [30.8%] responded in the MultiStem arm vs 15 out of 61 in the placebo arm [24.6%]), expanding to 27.1% (12 out of 27 patients [44.4%] responded in the MultiStem arm vs nine out of 52 [17.3%] in the placebo arm with a significant p-value of p<0.01) in the analysis, which only includes those who qualified under the original inclusion criteria. This is important because the global recovery statistic requires good or excellent recovery in all three clinical rating scales: NIHSS, mRS and Barthel Index. Patients, clinicians and third-party payors want to see an improvement in all three rating scales. Secondary endpoints such as those with excellent outcomes and hospital days also went from a non-significant p-value to statistical significance.

Exhibit 8: Odds ratios in MultiStem stroke trial in multiple endpoints

Source: Athersys

In terms of pharmacoeconomic benefits (which will likely be used by the company to justify a premium price, if approved), a 35% decrease in the number of days in hospital and a 37.5% decrease in expensive intensive care unit hospitalization (1.8 days, p=0.09) is quite meaningful. It is also important to take into account the fact that a very high percentage of people have permanent disability post-stroke (eg 35-40%7 of elderly patients become dependent on other people to function) leading to significant physical, occupational and rehabilitative therapy costs. The estimated lifetime cost of a stroke is $226,0008 per patient with 692,000 Americans a year having an ischemic stroke, so any savings by improving functional outcomes add up quickly.

  Varona et al, Stroke Research and Treatment, Vol. 2011, Article ID 879817

  Cipriano et al, American Journal of Neuroradiology 30:703-09

There are, of course, a few caveats. First, the numbers of patients involved is very small with a handful of patients essentially driving the results in a post-hoc analysis, especially in the global recovery and excellent outcome endpoints. Also, while the demographics for the trial as a whole appear to be balanced (see Exhibit 9), small differences in the subsets could affect the results. One additional point of NIHSS decreases the outcome of an excellent outcome by 17% at day 90.9

  Adams et al, Neurology 1999 Jul 13;53(1) 126-31

Exhibit 9: Demographic characteristics of Phase II trial in ITT analysis

Characteristic

MultiStem

Placebo

Age, mean

61.6

62.5

% male

52.2

54.8

% female

47.8

45.2

NIHSS at baseline

13.3

13.4

% of patients that received tPA

43.30

48.40

Source: Athersys

There is also the question of why the company changed the inclusion criteria in the first place. Enrollment was simply slower than expected, not because the patients could not be found or physicians did not want to enroll them, but because the product needed to be processed by bone marrow and cell processing units that were participating in the study. Typically, these are not open 24/7 like a hospital formulary and are more likely to have 9-5, Monday-to-Friday operation. The company was missing a very large number of patients simply because they were showing up too late in the day or at the weekend. To compensate for these missing patients, Athersys amended the inclusion criteria as noted above. Since then, the company has developed a process that is very simple, takes just a few minutes and can be handled by the hospital pharmacy, which operates at all hours. This will enable Athersys to start a new trial with criteria that includes only those treated within 36 hours of a stroke and excludes those who receive both tPA and mechanical reperfusion. We expect clarity on the future clinical development plan in the coming months.

If approved, MultiStem will revolutionize the treatment of stroke as the treatment window will be greatly expanded. It is extremely difficult for patients to arrive within the 3-4.5 hour window of tPA as first the stroke has to be noticed (which may be difficult for someone who has just had a stroke and is living at home alone), then the patient has to drive to the hospital, which may be a far drive if the patient is outside major cities. Based on registry data (see Exhibit 10), only between 25-36% of patients are admitted into the emergency department within three hours of a stroke. As hospital procedures are not instantaneous, these patients may still miss the window for tPA, as demonstrated by the fact that only about 5-8% of stroke patients actually receive the therapy. The situation changes drastically when looking at those patients who arrive in the hospital within 24 hours of a stroke as between 68-92% of patients are admitted by then. Also, the company estimates that >95% of stroke patients reach the hospital within 36 hours of the stroke. Hence, MultiStem has the potential to provide much needed therapy to a large group of stroke victims who currently have few or no options.

Exhibit 10: TIME from stroke to emergency department admission

Source: Reeves MJ et al., 2005 Acute stroke care in the US: results from 4 pilot prototypes of the Paul Coverdell National Acute Stroke Registry. Stroke. 2005 Jun;36(6):1232-40.

The future of MultiStem in Japan

In October, Athersys announced that the agreement between the company and Chugai to develop and commercialize MultiStem in Japan had ended following the failure of negotiations to modify the financial terms of the agreement and to decide on a development strategy.

While terminating major pharmaceutical partnership agreements is generally not positive, this may be an exception as Athersys already has a letter of intent with another Japanese company to re-partner the product. In addition, this new potential partnership will likely be broader as it would encompass multiple areas, not just ischemic stroke, also making it potentially more lucrative. We have removed our forecast for a $7m milestone from Chugai this year but now expect a $10m upfront payment from a new Japanese partner in 2016.

Japan remains an important potential market as the Pharmaceutical and Medical Devices Agency’s (PMDA) new framework for the approval of regenerative medicine products may allow MultiStem to be approved in the country on an accelerated basis, with only a small Japanese development program required. JCR Pharmaceuticals received full approval in Japan in September for its mesenchymal stem-cell treatment (Temcell) for acute graft-versus-host disease on the basis of a 25-patient Japanese trial. Given the attractive safety profile for MultiStem as well as the efficacy signal we have seen, MultiStem seems like it could be a good candidate for accelerated development/approval in Japan.

We estimate that MultiStem will be able to achieve peak market share of 10% of those patients who are able to arrive at the hospital within 24 hours and costs $30,000 (up from $25,000 previously) in the US, $25,000 (up from $20,000) in Japan and $25,000 (up from $15,000) in the EU. The reason for the increase is that recently announced reimbursement in Japan for two cell-based therapies (the stem cell therapy for acute graft-versus-host disease called Temcell and a cell sheet therapy for severe heart disease) was extremely favorable, greater than $100,000 in both cases, indicating that reimbursement authorities are willing to pay a premium for truly innovative medicines. Also, the estimated lifetime cost of a stroke is $226,00010 per patient, so a premium price can be justified if MultiStem is able to show a significant decrease in disability.

  Cipriano et al, American Journal of Neuroradiology 30:703-09

In terms of timing, we believe a Phase IIb will be necessary for approval in the US and EU, so we are moving back our expected year of launch to 2021 in those regions as a 2020 launch would be quite aggressive. In Japan, we now expect launch in 2019 as the need to find a new partner has delayed MultiStem’s development in that region. Our US peak sales estimate is now $1.8bn and $533m in Japan, while our EU estimate is $1,298m ($3.6bn worldwide compared to $2.8bn previously, due mainly to the increased pricing assumptions).

MultiStem in AMI

According to the American Heart Association, 735,000 Americans have an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) every year. For patients suffering from AMI, generally referred to as a heart attack, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the treatment of choice if it can be performed in a timely manner. In PCI, a catheter is inserted through the femoral artery or radial artery and to the site of blockage, where a balloon device is inflated to open the artery, and a stent is often put in place to permanently open the artery. The administration of stem cells in the per-infarct period, after blood flow has been restored by PCI, has been studied for some time, although predominantly with autologous stem cells. However, the logistical and biological limitations of using autologous stem cells in this setting, coupled with the apparent sub-optimal delivery by intracoronary infusion down the infarct-related vessel (failure to penetrate the myocardium), suggests an off-the-shelf stem cell product and a more targeted delivery mechanism would hold potential.

Athersys conducted a Phase I study in 25 patients (19 treated with MultiStem in three dose groups – 20m, 50m and 100m cells – and six in a registry control group) with first-time ST-elevation-myocardial infraction (STEMI). All patients underwent PCI and MultiStem was administered two to five days after AMI. MultiStem was delivered using a microneedle catheter to inject the cells into the wall of the infarct-related vessel. The results showed that MultiStem was well tolerated, with no serious adverse events deemed relevant to the product. In terms of efficacy, the delivery of 50m cells resulted in significant improvements in heart function, as measured by increases in ejection fraction (EF) and left ventricular stroke volume, assessed after four months (see Exhibits 11 and 12, respectively).11

  Penn M, et al. 2012. Adventitial Delivery of an Allogeneic Bone Marrow–Derived Adherent Stem Cell in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Phase I Clinical Study. Circulation Research. Jan 2012; 110: 304-311.

Exhibit 11: MultiStem impact on ejection fraction

Exhibit 12: MultiStem impact on stroke volume

Source: Penn M, et al. 2012. Adventitial Delivery of an Allogeneic Bone Marrow–Derived Adherent Stem Cell in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Phase I Clinical Study. Circulation Research. Jan 2012; 110: 304-311.

Source: Penn M, et al. 2012. Adventitial Delivery of an Allogeneic Bone Marrow–Derived Adherent Stem Cell in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Phase I Clinical Study. Circulation Research. Jan 2012; 110: 304-311.

Exhibit 11: MultiStem impact on ejection fraction

Source: Penn M, et al. 2012. Adventitial Delivery of an Allogeneic Bone Marrow–Derived Adherent Stem Cell in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Phase I Clinical Study. Circulation Research. Jan 2012; 110: 304-311.

Exhibit 12: MultiStem impact on stroke volume

Source: Penn M, et al. 2012. Adventitial Delivery of an Allogeneic Bone Marrow–Derived Adherent Stem Cell in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Phase I Clinical Study. Circulation Research. Jan 2012; 110: 304-311.

Needless to say, the Phase I data are very early and in a very small number of patients, and will have to be validated in a Phase II.

Athersys secured a $2.8m small business innovation research (SBIR) grant from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), to support a Phase II study and is currently enrolling a 90-patient study. This study has two primary outcome measures: the incidence and severity of adverse events at the 30-day time point and an assessment of the effects of MultiStem therapy on cardiac function 120 days after treatment using cardiac MRI. There will also be secondary outcome endpoints that will measure both of the above metrics at 12 months and also assess the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) over the same period. The company has guided for data in the latter part of the year and we believe it will come in Q416.

We estimate that MultiStem will be able to achieve peak market share of 12.5% at a cost of $30,000 (up from $20,000) per treatment. We increased the pricing assumptions to bring them in line with the assumptions in stroke, which were raised due to extremely favorable reimbursement decisions for cell-based therapies in Japan. Our peak estimate is now $2.1bn, up from $1.4bn previously due to the increase in pricing.

Entering the clinic in ARDS

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a life-threatening condition characterized by widespread inflammation in the lungs and can be triggered by a number of conditions, including pneumonia, trauma and sepsis (see Exhibit 13). The inflammation affects the oxygen transfer to multiple organ systems and affects their ability to function. Incidence estimates vary widely as there is differing criteria to define ARDS, but it appears there are around 200,000-250,000 cases in the US.12 Around 40% of those with ARDS do not survive, though much of that mortality rate is due to the underlying illness and not the ARDS itself.

  Walkey A, et al. 2012, Acute respiratory distress syndrome: epidemiology and management approaches. Clinical Epidemiology 2012; 4 159-169

Exhibit 13: Conditions that can trigger ARDS

Source: Walkey A, et al. 2012, Acute respiratory distress syndrome: epidemiology and management approaches. Clinical Epidemiology 2012; 4 159-169

Athersys was awarded approximately £2m (~$3m) to conduct a Phase IIa trial to treat ARDS by Innovate UK and is currently preparing to launch the trial, which should occur shortly. ARDS will be an especially difficult indication as it has multiple causes and there is usually a serious underlying condition causing it.

We estimate 15% peak market share for the market and a $27,500 (up from $17,500) average price in the US and EU. Our pricing assumption is a blend of our new estimates for the US and EU in the stroke indication. We project $1.3bn in peak sales compared to $615 previously with a 2024 launch. The main reason for the rise is the increase in pricing, as well as our belief that the addressable population is likely to be higher than we previously thought, as MultiStem, if approved, will likely be given even to those with a very poor prognosis due to its relatively safe profile.

Sensitivities

Athersys is subject to the risks typically associated with biotech company drug development, including the possibility of unfavorable outcomes in clinical trials and regulatory reviews, success of competitors and commercial decisions by partners or potential partners. While the MultiStem Phase II data in stroke had strong trends across multiple endpoints, it was still a relatively small trial where a handful of patients could have driven results, so this needs to be validated with further clinical study. The track record of R&D in stroke is extremely poor so this is a particularly high-risk indication, although MultiStem’s mechanism and dosing in a wider therapeutic window than conventional drugs could address prior challenges.

There was a small Phase I trial of Multi-Stem in AMI but otherwise there is little data to go on in this indication. ARDS will also likely be challenging as ARDS has multiple causes and patients often have severe underlying conditions that triggered the ARDS in the first place. Even if MultiStem does have efficacy in these patients it may be difficult to prove given the high mortality rate and heterogeneity of the patient population.

As losses are expected until 2020, there is likely to be a significant financing risk associated with Athersys. We currently believe it will need to raise additional capital around the middle of next year, barring a large upfront payment from a partnership. If it is unable to raise the necessary funds (we currently model a $20m raise in 2016), this could materially slow down the development of MultiStem.

Valuation

We have increased our fair value to $340m (vs $256m) or $4.08 per share (vs $3.09) as we modestly increased our pricing assumptions due to extremely lucrative reimbursement decisions for recently approved cell-based products in Japan. This was somewhat mitigated by pushing back the expected launch dates for the stroke and AMI programs by a year. The bulk of the value of the company (~60%) comes from the stroke program, which could have peak sales of $3.6bn worldwide (which is higher than our previous estimate for $2.8bn due to higher pricing assumptions). Further data from the stroke trial as well as the potential for partnerships in the stroke program could help serve as catalysts for shares.

Exhibit 14: Athersys valuation model

MultiStem indication

Status

Prob. of success

Launch year

Peak sales ($m)

Patent/exclusivity protection

Royalty

rNPV

Ischaemic stroke (US)

Phase II

25%

2021

1,798

2032

15%

$92

Ischaemic stroke (EU)

Phase II

25%

2021

1,298

2030

15%

$61

Ischaemic stroke (Japan)

Phase II

25%

2019

533

2028

20%

$44

AMI (USA)

Phase II

25%

2022

2,142

2032

15%

$90

ARDS (US/EU)

Phase IIa

15%

2024

1,342

2032

15%

$24

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

$311

Cash and cash equivalents (Q315) ($m)

$28.3

Total firm value ($m)

$340

Total basic shares (m)

83.29

Value per basic share ($)

$4.08

Stock options (9/2015, m)

1.7

Total number of shares

85.0

Diluted value per share ($)

$4.00

Source: Edison Investment Research

Financials

Athersys held $28.5m in cash at the end of Q315 and based on the current cash burn rate (~$6-7m per quarter) it faces a fresh financing requirement by mid-2016. We currently expect it to raise $20m in 2016 and $30m in 2017 ($150m total prior to profitability in 2020); however, these requirements may be lessened through partnerships for MultiStem in Japan and elsewhere. Currently we are showing this funding requirement as illustrative long-term debt in the model. If these become equity raises, there would be significant dilution, especially at current levels. Also, while we removed the Chugai milestone payment that had been expected in Q315, we have added a risk-adjusted $10m upfront payment for a new partner in Japan for 2016.

Exhibit 15: Financial summary

$000s

2012

2013

2014

2015e

2016e

2017e

Year end 31 December

US GAAP

US GAAP

US GAAP

US GAAP

US GAAP

US GAAP

PROFIT & LOSS

Revenue

 

 

8,708

2,438

1,623

1,743

4,200

0

Cost of Sales

0

0

0

0

0

0

Gross Profit

8,708

2,438

1,623

1,743

4,200

0

Research and development

(19,636)

(20,484)

(23,366)

(22,050)

(22,711)

(23,393)

Selling, general & administrative

(4,753)

(6,065)

(6,909)

(7,405)

(7,627)

(7,856)

EBITDA

 

 

(17,493)

(24,776)

(29,336)

(28,379)

(26,798)

(31,788)

Operating Profit (before GW and except.)

(17,173)

(24,430)

(28,976)

(28,082)

(26,468)

(31,519)

Intangible Amortisation

0

0

0

0

0

0

Exceptionals/Other

0

0

0

0

0

0

Operating Profit

(17,173)

(24,430)

(28,976)

(28,082)

(26,468)

(31,519)

Net Interest

34

11

50

66

11

11

Other (change in fair value of warrants)

2,404

(6,324)

6,591

608

0

0

Profit Before Tax (norm)

 

 

(17,139)

(24,419)

(28,926)

(28,016)

(26,457)

(31,508)

Profit Before Tax (IFRS)

 

 

(14,735)

(30,743)

(22,335)

(27,408)

(26,457)

(31,508)

Tax

0

0

253

0

0

0

Deferred tax

0

0

0

0

0

0

Profit After Tax (norm)

(17,139)

(24,419)

(28,673)

(28,016)

(26,457)

(31,508)

Profit After Tax (IFRS)

(14,735)

(30,743)

(22,082)

(27,408)

(26,457)

(31,508)

Average Number of Shares Outstanding (m)

32.6

57.7

77.0

81.5

84.8

85.8

EPS - normalised ($)

 

 

(0.53)

(0.42)

(0.37)

(0.34)

(0.31)

(0.37)

EPS - IFRS ($)

 

 

(0.45)

(0.53)

(0.29)

(0.34)

(0.31)

(0.37)

Dividend per share ($)

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

BALANCE SHEET

Fixed Assets

 

 

1,294

1,333

1,470

1,294

1,094

958

Intangible Assets

0

0

0

0

0

0

Tangible Assets

1,294

1,333

1,270

1,099

899

763

Other

0

0

200

195

195

195

Current Assets

 

 

26,309

32,855

27,248

23,190

22,513

24,376

Stocks

0

0

0

0

0

0

Debtors

490

520

694

315

315

315

Cash

25,533

31,948

26,127

22,492

21,815

23,678

Other

286

387

427

383

383

383

Current Liabilities

 

 

(4,478)

(4,368)

(4,692)

(14,277)

(14,277)

(14,277)

Creditors

(4,478)

(4,368)

(4,692)

(14,088)

(14,088)

(14,088)

Short term borrowings

0

0

0

(189)

(189)

(189)

Long Term Liabilities

 

 

(2,878)

(9,999)

(3,131)

(813)

(20,813)

(50,813)

Long term borrowings

(169)

(176)

(183)

0

(20,000)

(50,000)

Other long term liabilities

(2,709)

(9,823)

(2,948)

(813)

(813)

(813)

Net Assets

 

 

20,247

19,821

20,895

9,395

(11,482)

(39,756)

CASH FLOW

Operating Cash Flow

 

 

(17,665)

(22,784)

(25,791)

(14,957)

(20,547)

(28,015)

Net Interest

0

0

0

0

0

11

Tax

0

0

0

0

0

0

Capex

(347)

(385)

(297)

(127)

(130)

(133)

Acquisitions/disposals

0

0

0

0

0

0

Financing

30,357

29,584

20,267

10,371

0

0

Dividends

0

0

0

0

0

0

Other

0

0

0

1,078

0

0

Net Cash Flow

12,345

6,415

(5,821)

(3,635)

(20,677)

(28,137)

Opening net debt/(cash)

 

 

(12,784)

(25,364)

(31,772)

(25,944)

(22,303)

(1,626)

HP finance leases initiated

0

0

0

0

0

0

Exchange rate movements

0

0

0

0

0

0

Other

235

(7)

(7)

-6

0

0

Closing net debt/(cash)

 

 

(25,364)

(31,772)

(25,944)

(22,303)

(1,626)

26,511

Source: Edison Investment Research, company reports

Contact details

Revenue by geography

3201 Carnegie Avenue
Cleveland
Ohio 44115-2634
US
+1 (216) 431-9900
www.athersys.com

N/A

Contact details

3201 Carnegie Avenue
Cleveland
Ohio 44115-2634
US
+1 (216) 431-9900
www.athersys.com

Revenue by geography

N/A

Management team

Chairman and CEO: Dr Gil Van Bokkelen

President and chief operating officer: William (BJ) Lehmann

Co-founder of Athersys and CEO since October 1995, and chairman since August 2000. He is also chairman of the Alliance for Regenerative Medicine and chairman for the National Center for Regenerative Medicine. Mr Bokkelen serves on BIO’s ECS board of directors, and on the boards of the McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine and the Regenerative Medicine Foundation.

Joined Athersys in September 2001 and was its EVP of corporate development and finance from August 2002 until May 2006, when he became president. Mr Lehmann previously worked at McKinsey & Company (1994-2001), Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati (a Silicon Valley law firm) and First Chicago Corporation (a financial institution).

Chief scientific officer: Dr John Harrington

VP, global regulatory affairs: Dr Manal Morsy

Co-founder and CSO since October 1995. Mr Harrington is responsible for therapeutic product development. He led the development of the RAGE technology as well as its application for gene discovery, drug discovery and commercial protein production applications. Previously worked at Amgen and the Scripps Clinic.

Dr Morsy joined Athersys in 2013 as vice president and head of global regulatory affairs. She is responsible for the global regulatory activities for the company’s therapeutic programs, including its MultiStem cell therapy. Prior to joining Athersys, Dr Morsy served as vice president at PTC Therapeutics since 2007 where she led global regulatory affairs.

Management team

Chairman and CEO: Dr Gil Van Bokkelen

Co-founder of Athersys and CEO since October 1995, and chairman since August 2000. He is also chairman of the Alliance for Regenerative Medicine and chairman for the National Center for Regenerative Medicine. Mr Bokkelen serves on BIO’s ECS board of directors, and on the boards of the McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine and the Regenerative Medicine Foundation.

President and chief operating officer: William (BJ) Lehmann

Joined Athersys in September 2001 and was its EVP of corporate development and finance from August 2002 until May 2006, when he became president. Mr Lehmann previously worked at McKinsey & Company (1994-2001), Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati (a Silicon Valley law firm) and First Chicago Corporation (a financial institution).

Chief scientific officer: Dr John Harrington

Co-founder and CSO since October 1995. Mr Harrington is responsible for therapeutic product development. He led the development of the RAGE technology as well as its application for gene discovery, drug discovery and commercial protein production applications. Previously worked at Amgen and the Scripps Clinic.

VP, global regulatory affairs: Dr Manal Morsy

Dr Morsy joined Athersys in 2013 as vice president and head of global regulatory affairs. She is responsible for the global regulatory activities for the company’s therapeutic programs, including its MultiStem cell therapy. Prior to joining Athersys, Dr Morsy served as vice president at PTC Therapeutics since 2007 where she led global regulatory affairs.

Principal shareholders

(%)

AMP&A Management

4.51

Sabby Management

4.03

Vanguard Group

3.30

M&G Investment Management

2.40

Gil Van Bokkelen (CEO; co-founder)

1.08

Companies named in this report

Chugai (TYO:4529)


Edison, the investment intelligence firm, is the future of investor interaction with corporates. Our team of over 100 analysts and investment professionals work with leading companies, fund managers and investment banks worldwide to support their capital markets activity. We provide services to more than 400 retained corporate and investor clients from our offices in London, New York, Frankfurt, Sydney and Wellington. Edison is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (www.fsa.gov.uk/register/firmBasicDetails.do?sid=181584). Edison Investment Research (NZ) Limited (Edison NZ) is the New Zealand subsidiary of Edison. Edison NZ is registered on the New Zealand Financial Service Providers Register (FSP number 247505) and is registered to provide wholesale and/or generic financial adviser services only. Edison Investment Research Inc (Edison US) is the US subsidiary of Edison and is regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Edison Investment Research Limited (Edison Aus) [46085869] is the Australian subsidiary of Edison and is not regulated by the Australian Securities and Investment Commission. Edison Germany is a branch entity of Edison Investment Research Limited [4794244]. www.edisongroup.com

DISCLAIMER
Copyright 2015 Edison Investment Research Limited. All rights reserved. This report has been commissioned by Athersys and prepared and issued by Edison for publication globally. All information used in the publication of this report has been compiled from publicly available sources that are believed to be reliable, however we do not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this report. Opinions contained in this report represent those of the research department of Edison at the time of publication. The securities described in the Investment Research may not be eligible for sale in all jurisdictions or to certain categories of investors. This research is issued in Australia by Edison Aus and any access to it, is intended only for "wholesale clients" within the meaning of the Australian Corporations Act. The Investment Research is distributed in the United States by Edison US to major US institutional investors only. Edison US is registered as an investment adviser with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Edison US relies upon the "publishers' exclusion" from the definition of investment adviser under Section 202(a)(11) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and corresponding state securities laws. As such, Edison does not offer or provide personalised advice. We publish information about companies in which we believe our readers may be interested and this information reflects our sincere opinions. The information that we provide or that is derived from our website is not intended to be, and should not be construed in any manner whatsoever as, personalised advice. Also, our website and the information provided by us should not be construed by any subscriber or prospective subscriber as Edison’s solicitation to effect, or attempt to effect, any transaction in a security. The research in this document is intended for New Zealand resident professional financial advisers or brokers (for use in their roles as financial advisers or brokers) and habitual investors who are “wholesale clients” for the purpose of the Financial Advisers Act 2008 (FAA) (as described in sections 5(c) (1)(a), (b) and (c) of the FAA). This is not a solicitation or inducement to buy, sell, subscribe, or underwrite any securities mentioned or in the topic of this document. This document is provided for information purposes only and should not be construed as an offer or solicitation for investment in any securities mentioned or in the topic of this document. A marketing communication under FCA Rules, this document has not been prepared in accordance with the legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research.
Edison has a restrictive policy relating to personal dealing. Edison Group does not conduct any investment business and, accordingly, does not itself hold any positions in the securities mentioned in this report. However, the respective directors, officers, employees and contractors of Edison may have a position in any or related securities mentioned in this report. Edison or its affiliates may perform services or solicit business from any of the companies mentioned in this report. The value of securities mentioned in this report can fall as well as rise and are subject to large and sudden swings. In addition it may be difficult or not possible to buy, sell or obtain accurate information about the value of securities mentioned in this report. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance. Forward-looking information or statements in this report contain information that is based on assumptions, forecasts of future results, estimates of amounts not yet determinable, and therefore involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of their subject matter to be materially different from current expectations. For the purpose of the FAA, the content of this report is of a general nature, is intended as a source of general information only and is not intended to constitute a recommendation or opinion in relation to acquiring or disposing (including refraining from acquiring or disposing) of securities. The distribution of this document is not a “personalised service” and, to the extent that it contains any financial advice, is intended only as a “class service” provided by Edison within the meaning of the FAA (ie without taking into account the particular financial situation or goals of any person). As such, it should not be relied upon in making an investment decision. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Edison, its affiliates and contractors, and their respective directors, officers and employees will not be liable for any loss or damage arising as a result of reliance being placed on any of the information contained in this report and do not guarantee the returns on investments in the products discussed in this publication. FTSE International Limited (“FTSE”) © FTSE 2015. “FTSE®” is a trade mark of the London Stock Exchange Group companies and is used by FTSE International Limited under license. All rights in the FTSE indices and/or FTSE ratings vest in FTSE and/or its licensors. Neither FTSE nor its licensors accept any liability for any errors or omissions in the FTSE indices and/or FTSE ratings or underlying data. No further distribution of FTSE Data is permitted without FTSE’s express written consent.

Frankfurt +49 (0)69 78 8076 960

Schumannstrasse 34b

60325 Frankfurt

Germany

London +44 (0)20 3077 5700

280 High Holborn

London, WC1V 7EE

United Kingdom

New York +1 646 653 7026

245 Park Avenue, 39th Floor

10167, New York

US

Sydney +61 (0)2 9258 1161

Level 25, Aurora Place

88 Phillip St, Sydney

NSW 2000, Australia

Wellington +64 (0)48 948 555

Level 15, 171 Featherston St

Wellington 6011

New Zealand

Frankfurt +49 (0)69 78 8076 960

Schumannstrasse 34b

60325 Frankfurt

Germany

London +44 (0)20 3077 5700

280 High Holborn

London, WC1V 7EE

United Kingdom

New York +1 646 653 7026

245 Park Avenue, 39th Floor

10167, New York

US

Sydney +61 (0)2 9258 1161

Level 25, Aurora Place

88 Phillip St, Sydney

NSW 2000, Australia

Wellington +64 (0)48 948 555

Level 15, 171 Featherston St

Wellington 6011

New Zealand

Poundland — Update 11 December 2015

Poundland

Continue Reading

Subscribe to Edison

Get access to the very latest content matched to your personal investment style.

Sign up for free