TransContainer — Update 11 July 2016

TransContainer — Update 11 July 2016

TransContainer

Analyst avatar placeholder

Written by

TransContainer

Long-term drivers in place

Initiation of coverage

General industrials

11 July 2016

Price

RUB3,145

Market cap

RUB43bn

RUB63.90/US$

Net debt (RUBm) as at 31 December 2015

3,527

Shares in issue

13.7m

Free float

50%

Code

TRCN

Primary exchange

MCIX

Secondary exchange

LSE

Share price performance

%

1m

3m

12m

Abs

(3.8)

(3.8)

6.7

Rel (local)

N/A

N/A

N/A

52-week high/low

RUB3,995

RUB1,330

Business description

TransContainer owns and operates rail freight assets across Russia. Its assets comprise rail flatcars, handling terminals and trucks, through which it provides integrated end-to-end freight forwarding services to its customers.

Next events

Q2 results

22 July 2016

Analyst

Jamie Aitkenhead

+44 (0)20 3077 5700

TransContainer is a research client of Edison Investment Research Limited

TransContainer (TRC) is weathering the sanctions and oil price-led economic slowdown in Russia well. While current earnings are cyclically depressed, cash flow generation remains positive and a payout ratio of 25% is intact. Our forecast five-year EBITDA CAGR of 11% is driven by end-market growth, and by TRC capturing a bigger share of this with its higher-margin integrated freight forwarding business. In the 10 years since its foundation, management has invested RUB24bn enhancing its fleet and integrated client offering, thereby laying the foundations for earnings growth and margin expansion as markets recover.

Year end

Revenue (RUBm)

PBT*
(RUBm)

EPS*
(RUB)

DPS
(RUB)

P/E
(x)

Yield
(%)

12/14

20,538

3,751

286

71

11.0

2.3

12/15

20,311

3,530

139

52

22.6

1.7

12/16e

21,849

4,582

264

66

11.9

2.1

12/17e

23,664

5,669

327

82

9.6

2.6

Note: *PBT and EPS are normalised, excluding amortisation of acquired intangibles, exceptional items and share-based payments.

Structural long-term growth

The increasing use of containers in the Russian transport and logistics market is a key driver for TRC. Since 2001, rail containers have accounted for an increasing share of the Russian freight market (6.9% CAGR growth in the containerisation ratio from 2.2% in 2001 to 4.9% in 2015). Russian business is underserved by rail transportation and TRC will benefit as more freight is transported this way. While market conditions since 2014 have been difficult, volumes will respond to recovery in the Russian geopolitical and macroeconomic situation. Even if the recovery in Russian rail freight volumes is delayed, TRC will continue to benefit from structurally increasing levels of freight containerisation.

Moving along the value chain

Since formation in 2006, TRC has expanded its client offering beyond its historic focus on purely rail-container freight. The increasing proportion of revenues from its ‘integrated’ customer offering – 61.6% in FY15 – demonstrates the success of this strategy. TRC’s fleet has been expanded and modernised over this period and we see TRC continuing its strategy to dominate the integrated transport value chain.

Valuation: Cheap vs sector, highly cash generative

Our fair value for TRC is RUB3,400/share. Versus domestic and international peers, TRC is reasonably priced at 5.9x one-year EV/EBITDA (based on its own definition of EBITDA; sector: 9x). A key value driver is its high level of cash generation, with FCF/share of RUB397. TRC also looks attractive on a PEG ratio basis. FY16’s PEG is 0.38x (based on 24% earnings growth and 9x market P/E). However, given the high degree of political risk in Russia, TRC’s high WACC of 13.0% is justified. This weighs on our DCF valuation and the company earns well below its WACC on an ROCE basis. We believe any macroeconomic and geopolitical improvement in Russia will be reflected in a more favourable WACC.

Investment summary

Company description

TRC provides a full range of freight forwarding services to a broad range of customers in Russia. Its customers span all major Russian industries but it has a particular exposure to chemicals, paper and pulp, autos, machine tools and timber. TRC offers truck delivery, rail handling capabilities and rail freight services via its fleet of rail flatcars. In recent years, it has increased the proportion of its business that provides all of these capabilities to its customers in the form of integrated freight forwarding. In FY11 this accounted for 30% of revenues, and this had expanded to 61.6% in FY15.

Valuation: Stellar growth at a very reasonable price

We view TRC’s FY17 EV/EBITDA (TRC own definition) of 6.2x as undervaluing the fundamentals of the company. It has maintained positive EBITDA and a low level of indebtedness throughout Russia’s economic downturn, which started in 2014. TRC is a cash flow-generative, conservatively managed, asset-backed transportation and logistics company, which comfortably leads the Russian market and is investing in upscaling its product offering. Our fair value per share of RUB3,400 implies 8.1% upside to the current market price and is based primarily on an peer comparison-derived EV/EBITDA multiple. We use 6.7x FY16 EBITDA to arrive at our fair value, well within an average of TRC’s international and domestic peers of 8.2x current year EV/EBITDA. Despite its superior cash generation and earnings growth relative to most transport peers, we use a discount to reflect economic headwinds in Russia.

Financials: Q116 challenging, more positive on outlook

Q1 results, published on 31 May 2016, communicated a continuation of the negative operating environment of recent years but offered some upbeat comments in the outlook:

Q116 EBITDA (TRC definition) fell by 19.4% year-on-year, including a nearly 4% drop in EBITDA margins. Underlying the negative year-on-year growth were volume contractions in domestic, import, export and transit end markets.

Management were keen to point out that, for the first time in six quarters, the Russian rail container market demonstrated positive year-on-year growth in April and May.

Sensitivities: Cash flow and valuation sensitivity to macro

Currently, TRC is suffering from both the negative volume effect and the increased country risk premium associated with the recession in Russia. As we describe in our discussion on the valuation, the WACC is the single biggest moving part in TRC’s valuation and it is currently at 13.0%, which is punitive. Other than this, the principal sensitivities are to the ruble, Russian GDP and Russian inflation.

Macro issues: TRC is particularly exposed to political risk, with the sanctions imposed by the West on Russia over Ukraine the most eminent. For this reason, we include a table showing our fair value’s sensitivity to changes in WACC and terminal growth rate (Exhibit 13).

Ownership changes: Initially, it seemed likely that RZD, the Russian Railway Operator, would ultimately sell down its 50%+2 stake in TRC; however, this has not happened. Recent Russian press reports (Kommersant, 17 June 2016) have suggested the possibility that Russian Railways (RZD/ UTLC) might sell its stake to Summa.


TransContainer: Dominant market position

Former state-owned firm that has invested in change

Privatised initially in 2006, part-listed in 2007 and still majority-owned by Russian railway operator RZD, TRC has transitioned from a rail container-based operation to an integrated, intermodal freight market leader in Russia. It owns almost all the assets it uses, from trucks, to flatcars, to rail terminals. Despite suffering in terms of earnings and market value during the downturn, TRC has maintained its strategy of growing along the value chain.

Formerly part of JSC Russian Railways (the Russian rail network operator), TransContainer (TRC) was established in 2006. Initially, 100% of its shares were owned by RZD. 15% of TRC’s equity was placed privately in 2007 and a further 35% of the stock was listed in 2010. This took JSC’s overall stake down to 50% plus two shares (50%+2). TRC is listed on both the Moscow and London stock exchanges. The company retains its market leadership position in Russia and has invested RUB24bn enhancing its fleet of flatcars, containers, trucks, rail-side terminals and IT in its 10 years as a standalone company.

Russian rail market: Cyclical, competitive with huge potential

Exhibit 1: Russian rail container volume growth

Exhibit 2: Rail container volume to GDP multiple

Source: Edison Investment Research, TransContainer data

Source: Edison Investment Research, TransContainer data

Exhibit 1: Russian rail container volume growth

Source: Edison Investment Research, TransContainer data

Exhibit 2: Rail container volume to GDP multiple

Source: Edison Investment Research, TransContainer data

Since management of the Russian rail network was taken over by RZD in 2003, several competitors have been attracted into the sector as a result of its high levels of growth. The 8.2% volume CAGR from 2001-15 (Exhibit 1) was driven by high levels of economic growth, growth in trade and an increasing level of ‘containerisation’ (the market share of rail container cargo as a percentage of ‘containerisable’ cargo).

Exhibit 3: Russian rail containerisation level

Source: Edison Investment Research, TransContainer data, AT Kearney

These market fundamentals drew in competitors to TRC’s core market – most notably Modul, FESCO and Fintrans although there are more than a hundred small flat car operators in the fragmented Russian market – and reduced TRC’s market share from 60% to 46% currently. TRC states that pricing within the market is still competitive given the high degree of competition.

While underlying growth is a key attraction of TRC, it has to be acknowledged that the rail freight market in Russia is very cyclical. In 2008 and again in 2014, container volumes dropped significantly, by as much as 25% in 2008-09. Therefore, sensible companies in the space must manage their balance sheet, cash flow and cost structures accordingly.

Exhibit 2 shows the multiple of railway container market growth year-on-year to GDP growth year-on-year. This further emphasises the cyclical nature of TRC’s market. Addressable volumes fluctuate by a multiple of Russian GDP ranging between two and six times. Since 2014, the Russian rail cargo market has contracted markedly. However, through the cycle, TRC has remained profitable, and generated positive cash flows.

Economic sanctions and oil have hit the market hard

Since economic sanctions were first introduced on Russia in response to events in Ukraine in 2014, rail container volumes in transit, import and export have declined by 7.6%, 26.5% and 7.8%, respectively. These three types of route, taken together, accounted for 44.5% of TRC’s FY15 transportation volumes. Until there is a thawing of relations between Russia and the West, it is very unlikely that import, export and transit volumes will return to their 2013 peaks.

Market leader in a weak market

TRC is the dominant intermodal freight transport and logistics company in Russia. With a market share of 46% in rail container transportation, TRC is number one in Russia in terms of volume of rail transportation, size of flatcar fleet and volume of rail-side container handling. TRC’s assets are spread across Russia and it also has a presence in Europe and Asia.

Exhibit 4: Russian rail container market volume split

Source: Edison Investment Research, TransContainer data, RZD Information Centre

TRC’s revenues contracted by 20% between FY13 and FY15 as economic sanctions and the oil price decline lead to recession in Russia (Exhibit 4). During 2015, the overall Russian rail-container market contracted by 8%. Within this, domestic volumes were flat year-on-year, while imports declined by 18.5%, exports declined 12.6% and transit dropped by 13.6%. While TRC has a market share of 46%, it does have a slight skew to domestic markets (55% of TRC volumes versus 50% of total market split), which cushioned the negative impact of the heavy import and export losses. This explains why TRC’s sequential revenue loss was smaller than that of the overall market. Since 2008, TRC’s EBITDA (TRC definition) margin has ranged from 26.2% to 40.3%, with an average through the cycle of 35.7%.

Some evidence of a recovery, but early days

At Q116, management highlighted that in April and May the “Russian rail container market demonstrated a positive year-on-year dynamics (sic) for the first time following six consecutive quarters of year-on-year decline”. RZD data confirm this by showing that rail container transportation volumes increased year-on-year in April by 10.5%. While this would seem consistent with Russian economic leverage to the oil price, which has increased in recent months, we are more cautious and need to see sustained evidence of a recovery before updating our short-term forecasts. We do factor in volume growth this year and in coming years, but we do not forecast a return to the previous EBITDA (TRC definition) peak until FY19.

Taking advantage of strong Chinese-European trade

Bucking the trends seen elsewhere in TRC’s operations, year-on-year rail transit volumes between China and Europe in 2015 grew by 83%. TRC has deliberately made itself the most likely beneficiary of this trend. It has a stake in key cross-border rail terminals in Dostyk, on China’s north-western border, and Zabaikalsk, on China’s north-eastern frontier. These two terminals between them accounted for 92% of total Chinese-European rail freight volumes in 2015, allowing TRC to achieve dominance of the market. TRC believes that, on cost terms, rail is the most efficient means of transporting goods by land over long distances such as from China to Europe; according to its own data, this cost advantage is true for distances over 2,000km. This ‘transit’ market still only accounts for 6% of TRC’s volumes, but accounts for some of its larger customers (shown in Exhibit 5), such as UNICO, a Korean manufacturer.

Diverse range of end-customers and industries

Significant end-markets to which TRC is exposed include chemicals (17%), pulp and paper (13%), timber (10%) and food, auto and non-ferrous metals (7% each). It is noteworthy that, at group level, it has little direct exposure to the oil and gas or natural resources sectors, unlike its close peer Globaltrans. The cyclical nature of some of TRC’s customer base (eg chemicals, autos, pulp and paper, metals and machinery, which together account for 56% of FY15 adjusted revenues) goes some way to explaining TRC’s revenue decline in FY14 and FY15.

Exhibit 5: 2015 customer split (% revenues)

Exhibit 6: 2015 end-market exposure (% revenues)

Source: Edison Investment Research, TransContainer data

Source: Edison Investment Research, TransContainer data

Exhibit 5: 2015 customer split (% revenues)

Source: Edison Investment Research, TransContainer data

Exhibit 6: 2015 end-market exposure (% revenues)

Source: Edison Investment Research, TransContainer data

Macro-factors likely to delay 2020 objectives

TRC’s 2020 targets, originally communicated in 2013, were as follows:

To be the largest player in the Russian rail container transportation market.

Rail container traffic to reach 2.7m TEU and fleet to reach 42,000 cars.

50% share of 80-foot flatcars in the total fleet capacity, lower empty run ratio, better car fleet turnover.

Integrated logistics and freight-forwarding services to generate more than 50% of sales.

The subsequent downturn points to likely slippage in the targets. However, we should point out that the company is making good progress towards its efficiency goals.

Resilience, cost management, balance sheet control

The nature of TRCs business, whereby capital outlays can easily be scaled back or deferred, means it can be extremely responsive with its investment programme, adjusting it to match market conditions. For instance, TRC demonstrated flexibility when it reduced headcount, maintained a conservative balance sheet and cut capital investment during FY14 and FY15. The ability to insulate itself against cyclical downturns, we believe, is a key attraction of the stock: despite its cyclical nature, it is able to be flexible and cut spending and investment in order to retain a focus on cash generation during downturns. We believe this reflects the several economic cycles navigated by TRC management and their combined expertise in Russian rail freight.

Exhibit 7: Volatile returns profile

Exhibit 8: Capex flexibility

Source: Edison Investment Research, TransContainer data

Source: Edison Investment Research, TransContainer data

Exhibit 7: Volatile returns profile

Source: Edison Investment Research, TransContainer data

Exhibit 8: Capex flexibility

Source: Edison Investment Research, TransContainer data

Business model

TRC has pursued a shift in revenues to integrated freight forwarding from each of the other itemised services. As TRC grows its end-to-end business, so it can consolidate its market leadership position and, importantly, look to earn superior returns due to a combination of scale through vertical integration and by increasing its value-add offering to clients. The shift to integrated revenues is shown in Exhibit 9.

Exhibit 9: Dominating the value chain

Source: Edison Investment Research, TransContainer data

Note: the data beneath is ‘adjusted revenue’, which deducts third-party revenues. As TRC has grown its capabilities, third-party revenues have increased but are a straight pass through.

Exhibit 10: TRC activities across the Russian freight value chain

Source: Edison Investment Research, TransContainer data

Leveraging scale to dominate the value chain

TRC has an unrivalled asset base in Russia, with 24,461 flatcars, 64,596 ISO containers, 66 rail-side terminals and 220 trucks and semi-trailers. Given the scale of its operating assets and its experienced senior management, TRC has successfully moved its business to a predominantly integrated freight forwarding and logistics model over recent years. This ability to provide end-to-end freight services for its customer base rather than focusing on specific individual parts of the value chain, such as truck deliveries, is a more scalable and profitable business model. In FY15, its integrated freight forwarding and logistics unit contributed 61.6% of revenues versus 29.6% in FY11.

Investment in customer experience

Client focus is a key part of the offering. TRC’s client presentation shows that each customer gets a dedicated account manager who will work with the client to understand their specific requirements as regards customs clearance, storage and route optimisation. The e-Shop allows customers to get quotes and make and track orders from, for example, China to Poland. It is a good example of investments made and management focus on enhancing TRC’s customer offering.

Utilisation has suffered

In FY15, TRC transported a total of 1,390,000 TEUs (twenty foot equivalent units). It is notable that of this, only 1,031,000 TEUs were ‘profitable’. In other words, the difference was ‘empty runs’ or legs of journeys for which no freight is shipped. The ‘empty-run ratio’ has increased in recent years as trade sanctions means there are fewer imports and exports to Russia. This has put downward pressure on TRC’s margins in recent years. The company hopes to get empty-run ratios back to around 27%, from their current rate of 29.3% (Q116).

Cost structure

Management guides to approximately half of its total costs being variable. The most significant costs are as follows:

Third-party charges related to principal activities (56% of FY16 total costs) – accounted for as gross revenue, deducted to arrive at ‘adjusted revenue’, this represents fees paid to third parties for carrying out transportation work for which TRC bills its customers.

Freight and transportation services (15% of FY16 total costs) – approximately 70% of these costs are related to empty runs (legs of the journey where no cargo is transported) and they have therefore risen in recent years. These costs also constitute fees paid to RZD, the network operator, via Russian Railways infrastructure tariff pricing (either PPI or PPI minus) and other costs such as sea freight and idle flatcar parking.

Payroll and related charges (11% of FY16 total costs) – in the downturn, TRC was able to reduce headcount by 6.2% (FY15 vs FY14), although the year-on-year cash decline was minimal due to base salary indexation and increased social insurance expenses.

Exhibit 11: Operating cost evolution

Cost split (RUBm)

2013

2014

2015

2016e

% y-oy

Third-party charges related to principal activities

13,836

16,027

22,194

23,657

6.6%

Freight and Transportation Services

4,315

4,979

5,858

6,444

10.0%

Payroll and Related Charges

5,048

4,609

4,507

4,507

0.0%

Depreciation and Amortisation

1,943

2,461

2,470

2,509

1.6%

Materials, Repair and Maintenance

2,985

2,419

2,275

2,332

2.5%

Rent

1,869

443

638

447

-30.0%

Taxes other than Income Tax

724

631

521

534

2.5%

Other Operating Expenses

2,139

1,628

1,579

1,618

2.5%

Total Operating Expenses

32,859

33,197

40,042

42,047

5.0%

Source: Edison Investment Research, TransContainer data

Management

TRC Chairman Ivan Besedin, a graduate of the Moscow Institute of Railway Transport Engineers, was head of the Central Kaliningrad Railway from 2006 to 2011. From 2011 to 2014, he was head of the Moscow Metro system. As well as being chairman of the board, Mr Besedin also has a role at TRC’s parent, JSC Russian Railways, where he is head of the Department of Transport and Logistics Business Block Management.

Chief Executive Petr Baskakov and his team have managed the business over the last decade. Mr Baskakov, in common with several other directors, has had a long career in the Russian rail industry. His 24 years in industry started after graduating from the Moscow Institute for Railway Transport Engineers in 1986 with a degree in the Management of railway transportation processes. Also on the executive board, Vladimir Drachev graduated from Krasnoyarsk Technical School for Rail Transport in 1970. Many other board members have either rail-specific training and experience or engineering backgrounds, which, given the complexities of the Russian rail market, are essential.

That said, the executive board has some experience from more general commercial backgrounds. Deputy Director and CFO Anton Lopatin previously worked for Protek, a Russian pharmaceutical company from 2000-06, after completing an MBA at INSEAD. At the 27 June AGM, several director changes were announced. We view this as a continuation of management focus on enhancing operational efficiency and expect more news on the appointments later in the year.

Sensitivities

TRC has several key sensitivities ranging from macro factors such as economic output to several technical factors such as illiquidity.

The main earnings sensitivity is to Russian GDP. Rail container volumes have traditionally moved within a range of 2.1x to 6.3x year-on-year GDP changes.

TRC’s market share fell from 60% in 2006 to 47% in 2015, reflecting market liberalisation and the introduction of competition. However, this has stabilised over the last couple of years.

Valuation is sensitive to equity risk premium. Politics and geopolitics can change very rapidly in Russia, and do so without warning.

Stock liquidity: UTLC retains its 50%+2 ownership stake so TRC has a low free float of 50%-2. Additionally, there are several other large shareholders (TransFinGroup 8.45% and FESCO 24.12%). Liquidity is consequently restricted.

Currency: The strength of the ruble versus other currencies, most notably the euro, affects import and export flows and hence TRC’s freight volumes.

Trade: Import, export and transit account for 45% of TRC’s volumes and so are affected by Russia’s trade volumes and balance.

Valuation

TransContainer’s discount to global peers should narrow

Our preferred valuation methodology is EV/EBITDA multiple. We read across to TRC’s domestic and international peers and ascribe a discount to their average EV/EBITDA to reflect country risk within Russia. EV/EBITDA is preferable to price-to-earnings ratio as EV explicitly takes capital structure into account, which is important in capital intense industries such as transport. For the purposes of our valuation, we use TRC’s EBITDA definition (PBT + interest expense + depreciation and amortisation).

We compare a wide range of TRC’s peers in the global transportation sector in order to arrive at sector multiples (Exhibit 12). This overcomes comparing specific stocks, which may vary from TRC meaningfully. For instance Globaltrans, another listed Russian rail transportation firm, has a prospective EV/EBITDA of 1x. While Edison does not cover this stock, we acknowledge that Globaltrans has a high degree of revenue exposure to the energy and mining sectors, which were significantly and negatively affected by the global commodities sell-off from 2014 onwards. Therefore there is little direct read-across, but we include Globaltrans in our valuation table for as complete a picture as possible.

Exhibit 12: Transport comparative valuation sheet

Market Cap (local m)

Current EV/ EBITDA

Next EV/ EBITDA

Current P/E

Next P/E

FCF Yield

Div Yield This Yr

Moscow Exchange MICEX-RTS PJSC

255,731

10.2x

11.0x

-7.24%

6.3%

 

European Transport

 

TransContainer PJSC

RUSSIA

43,699

7.0x

5.6x

11.8x

10.4x

4.37%

2.1%

Globaltrans Investment PLC

CYPRUS

724

1.1x

1.0x

0.2x

0.2x

21.34%

3.7%

PKP Cargo SA

POLAND

1,404

3.1x

2.7x

13.3x

8.3x

-9.74%

7.6%

VTG AG

GERMANY

730

6.8x

6.5x

16.2x

12.5x

0.11%

2.5%

Average

 

4.5x

4.0x

10.4x

7.8x

4.02%

3.97%

 

Emerging Markets Transport

 

China Railway Tielong Container Logistics Co Ltd

CHINA

9,021

16.7x

17.5x

31.8x

29.7x

0.16%

0.9%

Daqin Railway Co Ltd

CHINA

90,539

5.9x

6.3x

10.3x

10.3x

7.64%

5.1%

Guangshen Railway Co Ltd

CHINA

22,665

6.6x

6.1x

23.3x

20.6x

3.44%

2.0%

Average

 

9.7x

10.0x

21.8x

20.2x

3.75%

2.67%

 

Developed Market Transport

Canadian Pacific Railway Ltd

CANADA

25,626

10.2x

9.6x

16.3x

14.3x

2.17%

1.1%

Kansas City Southern

UNITED STATES

9,563

10.5x

9.6x

19.3x

17.1x

1.86%

1.5%

Union Pacific Corp

UNITED STATES

74,155

9.2x

8.6x

17.3x

15.4x

4.27%

2.6%

Norfolk Southern Corp

UNITED STATES

25,099

8.3x

7.8x

15.3x

13.9x

2.99%

2.8%

Canadian National Railway Co

CANADA

59,570

10.8x

10.2x

17.3x

15.8x

4.11%

2.0%

Genesee & Wyoming Inc

UNITED STATES

3,425

9.8x

9.2x

16.8x

15.7x

4.39%

0.0%

CSX Corp

UNITED STATES

25,025

7.7x

7.3x

15.0x

13.6x

4.10%

2.8%

Aurizon Holdings Ltd

AUSTRALIA

10,054

9.5x

8.3x

20.4x

17.9x

3.24%

4.9%

Average

9.5x

8.8x

17.2x

15.5x

3.39%

2.21%

Overall Transport Average

8.2x

7.8x

16.3x

14.4x

3.63%

2.77%

Source: Bloomberg, Edison Investment Research. Priced at 7 July 2016

We derive our fair value of RUB3,400 per share by using an EV/EBITDA (TRC definition) multiple of 6.7x for the current year. This compares to a group of international peers (Exhibit 12), which trade on an average of 8.2x current year EBITDA. We apply a 1.5x EBITDA discount to international peers (from 8.2x to 6.7x EV/EBITDA – TRC definition) as this, we believe, risk adjusts our fair value to reflect country risk in Russia. Given macroeconomic and geopolitical uncertainty in Russia, plus TRC’s cyclical nature, we believe the stock merits a discount to its peers, but not as much as current market multiples imply. The average prospective (or +1yr) EV/EBITDA and price-to-earnings multiples of international transport stocks are 7.8x and 14.4x, respectively. This compares to 6.2x and 9.6x for TRC – based on our own EBITDA and EPS forecasts.

Exhibit 13: EBITDA multiple sensitivity based on FY16 Edison EBITDA est (TRC definition)

EBITDA multiple

Current Px

Target Px

5.0x

6.0x

6.7x

7.0x

8.0x

Edison FY16 EBITDA (RUBm)

7,599

7,599

7,599

7,599

7,599

Value per share (RUB)

2,451

2,950

3,283

3,561

4,116

Upside/ (downside) %

-22%

-4%

8%

13%

31%

Source: Edison Investment Research, TransContainer data. Note: Based on TRC share price of RUB3,145 (7 July 2016).

WACC leads to low DCF valuation

We have also tested a DCF valuation, but note that this is penalised by the high cost of capital in Russia currently. Macro factors well beyond the control of TRC mean its WACC is currently at a very high level. We calculate a WACC of 13.3% based on a risk-free rate of 4.0%, a post-tax cost of debt of 7.9%, a beta of 1.0 and an equity risk premium of 9.6%. Reversing the DCF, this is well above the 10.6% WACC we believe the market is using to value TRC. The debt weighting is 9.8% and equity is 90.2%. TRC is very sensitive to its WACC and economic normalisation could well decrease its WACC rapidly. Currently, however, the fact that Russian 10-year Eurobonds are yielding 4-5%, TRC’s debt is trading at 8.5% and its income statement interest charge is 8.5% all suggest that our WACC of 13.0% is appropriate.

We highlight TRC’s superior level of cash generation and potential for earnings growth as key drivers of value and believe that when the Russian economy rebounds, shareholders will see not only improved cash flows but a stock re-rating as the country risk premium and cost of debt normalise and TRC’s WACC decreases. In the meantime, TRC’s pre-tax ROCE, which peaked at 9.8% in FY13 and dipped to 4.3% in FY15, is well below its WACC of 13%. We forecast ROCE to rebound to 6.9% by 2020, with capital employed increasing at a high pace due to the company’s capex programme. Once again, we highlight that any improvement in Russia’s macroeconomic and geopolitical situation will lower the WACC and therefore can return the company to economic profitability. Meanwhile, the unwinding of the current discount applied by the market should better reflect, in our view, the sustained positive cash flow, high interest cover and payout ratio.

Financials

TRC’s overall earnings prospects are sensitive to economic activity in Russia and its nearest neighbours. They are complicated by current economic sanctions, political considerations and volatility in the price of oil and the other extractives that drive the Russian economy. However, profitability, while cyclical, has been partly mitigated by management’s focus on cash flows, leading to a flexible control of cash outlays, responsive to cyclical moves. In the event of a recovery in the Russian economy and consequent uplift in Russian rail container volumes, TRC will produce meaningful free cash.

Exhibit 14: EBITDA (rub) evolution (TRC definition)

Adjusted Revenue and Profitability Analysis

2013

2014

2015

2016e

2017e

2018e

Commentary

Integrated Freight Forwarding and Logistics Services

10,437

11,352

12,518

13,832

15,492

16,887

Increased containerisation, diversion of volumes from other units continue to drive growth

% y-o-y

8.8%

10.3%

10.5%

12.0%

9.0%

Rail-based Container Shipping Services

8,154

5,405

4,390

4,522

4,612

4,704

Recovery in volumes, increase in containerisation, offset by diversion to Integrated FF&L

% y-o-y

-33.7%

-18.8%

3.0%

2.0%

2.0%

Terminal Services and Agency Fees

4,181

2,167

2,130

2,194

2,238

2,271

Recovery in volumes, increase in containerisation, offset by diversion to Integrated FF&L

% y-o-y

-48.2%

-1.7%

3.0%

2.0%

1.5%

Truck Deliveries

1,367

978

848

873

891

909

Recovery in volumes, increase in containerisation, offset by diversion to Integrated FF&L

% y-o-y

-28.5%

-13.3%

3.0%

2.0%

2.0%

Other Freight Forwarding Services

571

283

134

135

136

139

% y-o-y

-50.4%

-52.7%

0.5%

1.0%

2.0%

Bonded Warehousing Services

317

234

194

195

197

201

% y-o-y

-26.2%

-17.1%

0.5%

1.0%

2.0%

Other

301

119

97

97

98

100

% y-o-y

-60.5%

-18.5%

0.5%

1.0%

2.0%

Total Adjusted Revenue

25,328

20,538

20,311

21,849

23,664

25,211

Contractions in FY14 and FY15 due to political and macroeconomic factors will reverse in FY16

% y-o-y

-18.9%

-1.1%

7.6%

8.3%

6.5%

EBITDA (TRC Definition: PBT + int expense + D&A)

10,074

7,816

6,526

7,599

8,771

9,533

Returning volumes will help margins recover. Empty run ratio improvement will benefit too

% margin

39.8%

38.1%

32.1%

34.8%

37.1%

37.8%

Source: TransContainer, Edison Investment Research

Earnings

During FY14, TRC’s revenues dropped by almost 20%. Between FY13 and FY15, EBITDA margins contracted from 40% to 32% (based on their own definition of adjusted EBITDA margin: PBT + interest expense + D&A). While maintaining such high margins is admirable during a severe economic shock, it is clear TRC’s operating cash flow is cyclical.

Furthermore TRC has little visibility of future earnings. Smaller customers operate on a spot-basis and larger entities have terms that offer TRC six-month visibility. The one-month-ahead view to which management guides effectively means the company partly operates in a spot market. Aware of this uncertainty, TRC has adjusted its operations, capex plans and financial leverage to insulate the business in economic contractions.

Even at its trough in (company-adjusted) EBITDA margin of 32%, TRC was able to generate positive net income. Its net interest charge of RUB356m was covered over 10 times by EBIT. Its Kazakh associate KDTS contributed RUB612m of income.

We note that TRC’s 27 June AGM did not approve the FY15 DPS. The company guides to a 25% payout as a ‘benchmark’ rather than a firm dividend policy. We believe that shareholders will get a second chance to vote on the dividend payout on the EGM which has been scheduled for 7 September 2016. For the purposes of our model we have assumed a 25% payout.

Strong cash flow generation and 25% payout

Although depressed in FY14/FY15, TRC’s post-working capital operating cash flow in this period at no point declined beneath RUB5bn. While TRC must plough capex into its transport fleet – this year’s capex is expected to be RUB3,800m – it is important to note that the Russian rail network, RZD, is responsible for maintaining the tracks and other infrastructure. Therefore, TRC can scale back capex very easily and quickly (as it did in FY15). This has enabled the company to continue to pay out 25% of earnings to shareholders in recent years, despite the 20% drop in revenues. It is noteworthy that is has maintained its payout ratio and invested significant capex while being only marginally net cash negative for FY14 and FY15. We forecast TRC’s price to cash flow yield will be a healthy 6.1x this year.

FY16 capex is forecast to be RUB3.8bn. RUB1bn will be invested in terminals, RUB1.3bn is to be invested in containers, RUB0.4bn will be invested in new flatcars and RUB1bn will go on ‘other capex’. As an example of how flexible its capex programme is, TRC’s average flatcar age is 15 years. Flatcars have an expected useful life of 30 years so therefore a couple of years of delayed capex will not negatively affect capacity.

Balance sheet

Exhibit 15: Debt maturity profile

Exhibit 16: Declining debt, increasing maturity

Source: Edison Investment Research, TransContainer data

Source: Edison Investment Research, TransContainer data

Exhibit 15: Debt maturity profile

Source: Edison Investment Research, TransContainer data

Exhibit 16: Declining debt, increasing maturity

Source: Edison Investment Research, TransContainer data

AT FY15, TRC was conservatively leveraged with a net debt to EBITDA (own definition) multiple of 0.86x. We anticipate this will fall in FY16 and thereafter. Currently, the company is guiding to long-term capex of between 20-30% of sales (Edison forecasts 20%), but capex will only run at this level provided there is volume growth. As explained in the cash flow section, the relatively low age of its flatcar fleet gives TRC flexibility to reduce its capex programme and increase its free cash flow if required. Debt to EV is only 10%, giving the company a further buffer against any future economic deterioration. Despite gradually increasing debt levels, TRC will not be financially stretched at any point. We forecast net debt to EBITDA (TRC definition) to decline from FY15’s multiple of 0.86x to 0.51x in FY20. Meanwhile interest cover will increase from 9.2x to 14.8x over the same period.

Therefore, TRC will have to consider whether it maintains its 25% payout ratio or looks for other ways to deploy capital. Also of note is that all TRC’s debt is ruble-denominated. Therefore, it has no balance sheet exposure to the significant devaluations the ruble has experienced in recent years.

Exhibit 17: Financial summary

RUBm

2014

2015

2016e

2017e

2018e

2019e

2020e

31-December

IFRS

IFRS

IFRS

IFRS

IFRS

IFRS

IFRS

PROFIT & LOSS

Revenue

 

 

20,538

20,311

21,849

23,664

25,211

26,890

28,710

EBITDA (company definition)

 

 

7,816

6,526

7,599

8,771

9,533

10,294

11,125

EBITDA (Edison definition)

 

 

6,544

5,744

6,778

7,826

8,492

9,149

9,861

Operating Profit (before amort. and except.)

4,083

3,274

4,269

5,231

5,739

6,226

6,756

Intangible Amortisation

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Exceptionals

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Other

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Operating Profit

4,083

3,274

4,269

5,231

5,739

6,226

6,756

Net Interest

(497)

(356)

(360)

(303)

(282)

(258)

(229)

Share of assocs/jvs gains/(losses)

165

612

673

741

815

896

986

Forex gains/(losses)

938

0

0

0

0

0

0

Other

18

18

0

0

0

0

0

Profit Before Tax (norm)

 

 

3,751

3,530

4,582

5,669

6,272

6,864

7,514

Profit Before Tax (FRS 3)

 

 

4,707

3,548

4,582

5,669

6,272

6,864

7,514

Tax

(1,049)

(717)

(962)

(1,190)

(1,317)

(1,442)

(1,578)

Profit After Tax (norm)

2,702

2,813

3,620

4,478

4,955

5,423

5,936

Profit After Tax (FRS 3)

3,658

2,831

3,620

4,478

4,955

5,423

5,936

Average Number of Shares Outstanding (m)

13.7

13.7

13.7

13.7

13.7

13.7

13.7

EPS - normalised (RUB)

 

 

286.0

138.7

264.4

327.0

361.8

396.0

433.5

EPS - normalised and fully diluted (RUB)

 

286.0

138.7

264.4

327.0

361.8

396.0

433.5

EPS - (IFRS) (RUB)

 

 

267.1

206.7

264.4

327.0

361.8

396.0

433.5

Dividend per share (RUB)

71.0

51.7

66.1

81.8

90.5

99.0

108.4

EBITDA Margin (%)

31.9

28.3

31.0

33.1

33.7

34.0

34.3

Operating Margin (before GW and except.) (%)

19.9

16.1

19.5

22.1

22.8

23.2

23.5

BALANCE SHEET

Fixed Assets

 

 

42,012

41,739

43,030

45,404

47,945

50,669

53,594

Intangible Assets

210

246

246

246

246

246

246

Tangible Assets

37,900

37,827

39,118

41,492

44,033

46,757

49,682

Investments

3,343

3,023

3,023

3,023

3,023

3,023

3,023

Other

559

643

643

643

643

643

643

Current Assets

 

 

6,965

7,435

8,498

9,115

9,789

10,580

11,493

Stocks

340

315

339

367

391

417

445

Debtors

1,542

1,392

1,497

1,622

1,728

1,843

1,968

Cash

1,904

2,110

2,925

3,225

3,568

3,982

4,491

Other

3,179

3,618

3,737

3,902

4,102

4,337

4,590

Current Liabilities

 

 

(5,581)

(6,747)

(6,862)

(7,021)

(7,215)

(7,441)

(7,685)

Creditors

(3,084)

(3,405)

(3,520)

(3,679)

(3,873)

(4,099)

(4,343)

Short term borrowings

(919)

(1,893)

(1,893)

(1,893)

(1,893)

(1,893)

(1,893)

Other

(1,578)

(1,449)

(1,449)

(1,449)

(1,449)

(1,449)

(1,449)

Long Term Liabilities

 

 

(8,151)

(6,240)

(6,240)

(6,240)

(6,240)

(6,240)

(6,240)

Long term borrowings

(5,458)

(3,744)

(3,744)

(3,744)

(3,744)

(3,744)

(3,744)

Other long term liabilities

(2,693)

(2,496)

(2,496)

(2,496)

(2,496)

(2,496)

(2,496)

Net Assets

 

 

62,709

62,161

64,630

67,780

71,189

74,930

79,013

CASH FLOW

Operating Cash Flow

 

 

7,617

5,437

6,644

7,668

8,355

8,999

9,699

Net Interest

(557)

(394)

(360)

(303)

(282)

(258)

(229)

Tax

(964)

(727)

(962)

(1,190)

(1,317)

(1,442)

(1,578)

Capex

(4,136)

(2,400)

(3,800)

(4,970)

(5,294)

(5,647)

(6,029)

Acquisitions/disposals

(75)

(12)

0

0

0

0

0

Financing

199

0

0

0

0

0

0

Dividends

(1,117)

(974)

(708)

(905)

(1,120)

(1,239)

(1,356)

Other

199

0

0

0

0

0

0

Net Cash Flow

967

930

815

300

343

415

508

Opening net debt/(cash)

 

 

6,004

4,473

3,527

2,712

2,412

2,069

1,655

HP finance leases initiated

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Other

564

16

0

0

0

0

0

Closing net debt/(cash)

 

 

4,473

3,527

2,712

2,412

2,069

1,655

1,146

Source: Edison Investment Research, TransContainer data

Contact details

Revenue by geography

Oruzheyniy Pereulok 19

Moscow, Russian Federation 125047

www.trcont.ru/

+7 495 788 17 17

N/A

Contact details

Oruzheyniy Pereulok 19

Moscow, Russian Federation 125047

www.trcont.ru/

+7 495 788 17 17

Revenue by geography

N/A

Management team

Chairman of the Board of Directors: Ivan Besedin

Chief Executive: Petr Baskakov

A graduate of the Moscow Institute of Railway Transport Engineers, Mr Besedin was Head of the Central Kaliningrad Railway from 2006 to 2011. From 2011 to 2014, he was Head of the Moscow Metro system. As well as being Chairman of the Board, Mr Besedin also has a role at TRC’s parent, JSC Russian Railways, where he is Head of the Department of Transport and Logistics business Block Management.

CEO since 2006, Mr Baskakov has over 24 years of experience in Russian railways. He is a graduate of the Moscow Institute of Railway Transport Engineers with a degree in the management of railway transportation processes. Prior to joining TRC, Mr Baskakov worked at Podolsk Production and Railway Transportation Enterprise and, from 1993, he was head of Moskva-Tovarnaya-Kurskaya station, a Moscow rail-side cargo terminal.

First Deputy CEO: Vladimir Drachev

Deputy General Director, CFO: Anton Lopatin

With 24 years in the Russian railway sector starting with qualifying at Krasnoyarsk Technical School for Rail Transport in 1970 and the Irkutsk Institute of Railway Engineers in 1982, majoring in railways operations, Mr Drachev brings relevant experience to TRC. He has held roles at East-Siberian and Krasnoyarsk Railroads and in 1997 became the deputy head of the Department of Management of the Ministry of Railways. In 2002, Mr Drachev was appointed as the head of the Department of Transportation Management of the Ministry of Transportation, and from 2005 until 2006 he served as the first deputy head of Sverdlovsk Railway.

Anton Lopatin has been deputy CEO for economics and finance since 2008. He graduated from the State University of New York in 2000 with a degree in economics, and in 2008, he received an MBA degree from INSEAD Business School. Between 2000 and 2006, Mr Lopatin worked at Protek, a pharmaceutical company holding roles including CFO.

Management team

Chairman of the Board of Directors: Ivan Besedin

A graduate of the Moscow Institute of Railway Transport Engineers, Mr Besedin was Head of the Central Kaliningrad Railway from 2006 to 2011. From 2011 to 2014, he was Head of the Moscow Metro system. As well as being Chairman of the Board, Mr Besedin also has a role at TRC’s parent, JSC Russian Railways, where he is Head of the Department of Transport and Logistics business Block Management.

Chief Executive: Petr Baskakov

CEO since 2006, Mr Baskakov has over 24 years of experience in Russian railways. He is a graduate of the Moscow Institute of Railway Transport Engineers with a degree in the management of railway transportation processes. Prior to joining TRC, Mr Baskakov worked at Podolsk Production and Railway Transportation Enterprise and, from 1993, he was head of Moskva-Tovarnaya-Kurskaya station, a Moscow rail-side cargo terminal.

First Deputy CEO: Vladimir Drachev

With 24 years in the Russian railway sector starting with qualifying at Krasnoyarsk Technical School for Rail Transport in 1970 and the Irkutsk Institute of Railway Engineers in 1982, majoring in railways operations, Mr Drachev brings relevant experience to TRC. He has held roles at East-Siberian and Krasnoyarsk Railroads and in 1997 became the deputy head of the Department of Management of the Ministry of Railways. In 2002, Mr Drachev was appointed as the head of the Department of Transportation Management of the Ministry of Transportation, and from 2005 until 2006 he served as the first deputy head of Sverdlovsk Railway.

Deputy General Director, CFO: Anton Lopatin

Anton Lopatin has been deputy CEO for economics and finance since 2008. He graduated from the State University of New York in 2000 with a degree in economics, and in 2008, he received an MBA degree from INSEAD Business School. Between 2000 and 2006, Mr Lopatin worked at Protek, a pharmaceutical company holding roles including CFO.

Principal shareholders

(%)

UTLC

50.0%

FESCO

24.12%

TransFinGroup

8.45%

Companies named in this report

Globaltrans (GLTR LSE), PKP Cargo SA (PKP WSE), VTG AG (VTG ASX), China Railway Tielong Container Logistics Co Ltd (0390 HKG), Daqin Railway Co Ltd (601006 SHA), Guangshen Railway Co Ltd (GSH NYSE), Canadian Pacific Railway Ltd (CP TSE), Kansas City Southern (KSU NYSE), Union Pacific Corp (UNP NYSE), Norfolk Southern Corp (NSC NYSE), Canadian National Railway Co (CNR TSE), Genesee & Wyoming Inc (GWR NYSE), CSX Corp (CSQ NASDAQ), Aurizon Holdings Ltd (AJZ ASX)

Edison, the investment intelligence firm, is the future of investor interaction with corporates. Our team of over 100 analysts and investment professionals work with leading companies, fund managers and investment banks worldwide to support their capital markets activity. We provide services to more than 400 retained corporate and investor clients from our offices in London, New York, Frankfurt, Sydney and Wellington. Edison is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Edison Investment Research (NZ) Limited (Edison NZ) is the New Zealand subsidiary of Edison. Edison NZ is registered on the New Zealand Financial Service Providers Register (FSP number 247505) and is registered to provide wholesale and/or generic financial adviser services only. Edison Investment Research Inc (Edison US) is the US subsidiary of Edison and is regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Edison Investment Research Limited (Edison Aus) [46085869] is the Australian subsidiary of Edison and is not regulated by the Australian Securities and Investment Commission. Edison Germany is a branch entity of Edison Investment Research Limited [4794244]. www.edisongroup.com

DISCLAIMER
Copyright 2016 Edison Investment Research Limited. All rights reserved. This report has been commissioned by TransContainer and prepared and issued by Edison for publication globally. All information used in the publication of this report has been compiled from publicly available sources that are believed to be reliable, however we do not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this report. Opinions contained in this report represent those of the research department of Edison at the time of publication. The securities described in the Investment Research may not be eligible for sale in all jurisdictions or to certain categories of investors. This research is issued in Australia by Edison Aus and any access to it, is intended only for "wholesale clients" within the meaning of the Australian Corporations Act. The Investment Research is distributed in the United States by Edison US to major US institutional investors only. Edison US is registered as an investment adviser with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Edison US relies upon the "publishers' exclusion" from the definition of investment adviser under Section 202(a)(11) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and corresponding state securities laws. As such, Edison does not offer or provide personalised advice. We publish information about companies in which we believe our readers may be interested and this information reflects our sincere opinions. The information that we provide or that is derived from our website is not intended to be, and should not be construed in any manner whatsoever as, personalised advice. Also, our website and the information provided by us should not be construed by any subscriber or prospective subscriber as Edison’s solicitation to effect, or attempt to effect, any transaction in a security. The research in this document is intended for New Zealand resident professional financial advisers or brokers (for use in their roles as financial advisers or brokers) and habitual investors who are “wholesale clients” for the purpose of the Financial Advisers Act 2008 (FAA) (as described in sections 5(c) (1)(a), (b) and (c) of the FAA). This is not a solicitation or inducement to buy, sell, subscribe, or underwrite any securities mentioned or in the topic of this document. This document is provided for information purposes only and should not be construed as an offer or solicitation for investment in any securities mentioned or in the topic of this document. A marketing communication under FCA Rules, this document has not been prepared in accordance with the legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research.
Edison has a restrictive policy relating to personal dealing. Edison Group does not conduct any investment business and, accordingly, does not itself hold any positions in the securities mentioned in this report. However, the respective directors, officers, employees and contractors of Edison may have a position in any or related securities mentioned in this report. Edison or its affiliates may perform services or solicit business from any of the companies mentioned in this report. The value of securities mentioned in this report can fall as well as rise and are subject to large and sudden swings. In addition it may be difficult or not possible to buy, sell or obtain accurate information about the value of securities mentioned in this report. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance. Forward-looking information or statements in this report contain information that is based on assumptions, forecasts of future results, estimates of amounts not yet determinable, and therefore involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of their subject matter to be materially different from current expectations. For the purpose of the FAA, the content of this report is of a general nature, is intended as a source of general information only and is not intended to constitute a recommendation or opinion in relation to acquiring or disposing (including refraining from acquiring or disposing) of securities. The distribution of this document is not a “personalised service” and, to the extent that it contains any financial advice, is intended only as a “class service” provided by Edison within the meaning of the FAA (ie without taking into account the particular financial situation or goals of any person). As such, it should not be relied upon in making an investment decision. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Edison, its affiliates and contractors, and their respective directors, officers and employees will not be liable for any loss or damage arising as a result of reliance being placed on any of the information contained in this report and do not guarantee the returns on investments in the products discussed in this publication. FTSE International Limited (“FTSE”) © FTSE 2016. “FTSE®” is a trade mark of the London Stock Exchange Group companies and is used by FTSE International Limited under license. All rights in the FTSE indices and/or FTSE ratings vest in FTSE and/or its licensors. Neither FTSE nor its licensors accept any liability for any errors or omissions in the FTSE indices and/or FTSE ratings or underlying data. No further distribution of FTSE Data is permitted without FTSE’s express written consent.

Frankfurt +49 (0)69 78 8076 960

Schumannstrasse 34b

60325 Frankfurt

Germany

London +44 (0)20 3077 5700

280 High Holborn

London, WC1V 7EE

United Kingdom

New York +1 646 653 7026

245 Park Avenue, 39th Floor

10167, New York

US

Sydney +61 (0)2 9258 1161

Level 25, Aurora Place

88 Phillip St, Sydney

NSW 2000, Australia

Wellington +64 (0)48 948 555

Level 15, 171 Featherston St

Wellington 6011

New Zealand

Frankfurt +49 (0)69 78 8076 960

Schumannstrasse 34b

60325 Frankfurt

Germany

London +44 (0)20 3077 5700

280 High Holborn

London, WC1V 7EE

United Kingdom

New York +1 646 653 7026

245 Park Avenue, 39th Floor

10167, New York

US

Sydney +61 (0)2 9258 1161

Level 25, Aurora Place

88 Phillip St, Sydney

NSW 2000, Australia

Wellington +64 (0)48 948 555

Level 15, 171 Featherston St

Wellington 6011

New Zealand

Sealegs Corporation — Update 11 July 2016

Sealegs Corporation

Continue Reading

Subscribe to Edison

Get access to the very latest content matched to your personal investment style.

Sign up for free