Vernalis — Update 6 April 2016

Vernalis — Update 6 April 2016

Vernalis

Analyst avatar placeholder

Written by

Vernalis

Establishing a firm foundation

Interim results

Pharma & biotech

6 April 2016

Price

52.38p

Market cap

£233m

$1.43/£

Net cash (£m) at 31 December 2015

54.0

Shares in issue

445.1m

Free float

64%

Code

VER

Primary exchange

AIM

Secondary exchange

N/A

Share price performance

%

1m

3m

12m

Abs

(16)

(25.2)

13.9

Rel (local)

(14.7)

(24.3)

26.6

52-week high/low

86.5p

44.88p

Business description

Vernalis is a UK speciality pharma company with an FDA-approved, prescription-only cough cold treatment, Tuzistra XR; an FDA approved amoxicillin, Moxatag; and a late-stage US cough cold pipeline of four products. Vernalis also has an early- to mid-stage R&D pipeline of CNS and cancer projects. Its primary focus is on commercialising Tuzistra XR in the US.

Next events

FY16 results (estimated)

September 2016

CCP-07 NDA filing

2016

CCP-08 NDA filing

2016

Moxatag launch

2016

Analysts

Lala Gregorek

+44 (0)20 3681 2527

Christian Glennie

+44 (0)20 3077 5727

Vernalis is a research client of Edison Investment Research Limited

Vernalis reported a modest £0.6m in Tuzistra XR sales over the first four months post-launch due to the mild cough cold season. The US launch of this prescription-only (Rx), extended release (ER) cough cold medicine is the first step in Vernalis’s transition into a commercial-stage speciality pharma company, targeting a $3.5bn market opportunity. The emphasis for year one of Tuzistra XR commercialisation is operational: establishing the platform for future sales growth. However, financial performance, in particular, during its second year on the market, will be an important determinant of whether Vernalis will need to raise new funds near term.

Year end

Revenue
(£m)

PBT*
(£m)

EPS*
(p)

DPS
(p)

P/E
(x)

Yield
(%)

12/13

14.1

(4.7)

(0.8)

0.0

N/A

N/A

06/15**

19.9

(6.9)

(1.0)

0.0

N/A

N/A

06/16e

11.9

(28.0)

(6.0)

0.0

N/A

N/A

06/17e

30.6

(15.4)

(3.3)

0.0

N/A

N/A

Note: *PBT and EPS are normalised, excluding intangible amortisation, exceptional items and share-based payments. **18-month reporting period, 12 months thereafter.

Solid operational progress offsets modest sales

Tuzistra XR’s slow launch into a mild season suggests FY16 consensus forecasts will fall despite a later peak than typical. So far, Vernalis has achieved an average net price per Rx of $70-75 based on a $177 wholesale acquisition cost per average 168ml Rx. Commercial focus is on improving physician awareness of and patient accessibility to Tuzistra XR. Improved reimbursement is vital: Tier 3 status has been achieved at c 55% of plans (vs 75-80% target); CVS Caremark is a major gap.

Future focus: Season two

Ongoing initiatives to improve awareness, stocking and formulary coverage should increase market share longer term. A spring allergy campaign (cough due to allergy) should ensure that Tuzistra XR is prescribed in the off-season. Assuming a solid foundation going into the 2016/17 cough cold season, the second year of Tuzistra XR’s launch should provide better insight into its ultimate sales potential.

Financials: Runway to profitability

Net cash of £54m (end-December 2015) provides sufficient runway to sustainable profitability in FY18 on our current forecasts. With operating costs of c £40m pa (and limited room to make savings), the level of Tuzistra XR sales in FY17 and FY18 and the timing of success-based milestone payments to Tris ($46m in aggregate) will determine whether Vernalis will need to raise funding in FY18.

Valuation: DCF valuation of £384m (86p per share)

Our DCF valuation has decreased to £384m from £439m following revisions to our financial forecasts based on new cost guidance, a slower Tuzistra XR ramp-up and updated Tris milestone timings. Our peak sales estimate for the cough cold portfolio is maintained at c $500m, but is now anticipated by 2025.

Tuzistra XR: The (sales) force awakens

Vernalis launched Tuzistra XR, its first prescription-only, extended-release, reformulated cough cold medicine, into the US market in September 2015. This launch represents the first step in Vernalis’s transition into a commercial-stage speciality pharma company, targeting a $3.5bn market opportunity (at brand pricing). Management has emphasised that year one of commercialisation is less about hitting a target sales level and more about establishing the platform for future sales growth of Tuzistra XR, and of its developmental-stage cough cold products once they reach the market. However, the financial performance of this franchise, in particular during its second year on the market, could have an important bearing on whether Vernalis will need to raise additional funds in the near term. We discuss this later in the report, after presenting a SWOT analysis for the cough cold portfolio in Exhibit 1 and examining some of the early launch trends overleaf.

Exhibit 1: Vernalis cough/cold franchise SWOT analysis

Strengths

Weaknesses

Potential for improved patient compliance: 12-hourly dosing with XR cough cold medicines offers greater convenience over immediate-release counterparts (requiring four to six doses daily) with deemed equivalent efficacy based on bioequivalence data.

High barriers to entry: Tris’s patented LiquiXR sustained-release liquid reformulation technology is a key factor in creating high barriers to entry given the difficulty in creating a liquid formula that the FDA will approve due to the challenges in maintaining the stability of the formulation. Additionally, manufacturing and formulation patents covering Tuzistra XR run until 2029.

Limited direct competition: Tussionex (chlorpheniramine/hydrocodone) is the only other commercialised liquid ER product available in the US Rx market. Three Tussionex generics (one based on legacy UCB formulation technology, one on Tris’s technology and one on Neos Therapeutics’) are also available.

Potential for switching from Tussionex: DEA reclassification of hydrocodone may mean that hydrocodone prescribers find it easier and less costly and restrictive to prescribe Tuzistra XR than Tussionex. Physician market research conducted by Vernalis’s partners suggests there is willingness to prescribe Tuzistra XR among prescribers in the broader $1.6bn narcotics segment (which also includes codeine plus expectorants, as well as the hydrocodone segment), albeit at lower penetration in the hydrocodone segment than in the primary market.

Gaps in formulary coverage: this is a key driver of the ability to capture market share. Approximately 19-25% of Rx are lost due to insurance rejections. Vernalis is targeting 75-80% of Tier 3 unrestricted plans; Ashfield, its market access partner, has secured c 55% to date (equal to c 120 million lives covered). CVS Caremark is a notable gap.

High level of reversals: approximately 22-26% of Rx lost are through patient abandonment or pharmacy reversals. Vernalis is seeking to reduce this by introducing incentives to increase pharmacy stocking and lowering patient co-pay cost via its coupon programme.

Variability in salesforce effectiveness: the field force is located around pockets of high-prescribing doctors. However, there is variability in territory performance. Focus is on identifying and addressing performance barriers (eg formulary coverage, training etc).

Seasonal variability means variable income streams: the fluctuating severity of the cold and flu season means that Rx levels will vary year-on-year. IMS Health data indicates that 29-35m Rx were filled annually between 2012 and 2015. As such, there will be fluctuations in Vernalis’s future income streams and profit once its products are on the market.

Opportunities

Threats

Significant market opportunity: focus is on the prescription-only (Rx) cough cold market, which in the US is valued at up to $3.5bn at brand pricing (c 35m Rx annually assuming a net price per Rx of $100).

Broad product portfolio: in collaboration with Tris Pharma, Vernalis is developing four other XR products. The APIs are undisclosed, but are understood to cover the other API market segments, with the exception of dextromethorphan (which would be an OTC product).

Non-narcotic product(s) in development: the portfolio includes benzonatate-based product(s) that would address a market segment worth c $940m at current pricing. This segment has benefited from the drop in market share of hydrocodone and is likely to be the next largest product alongside Tuzistra XR.

Labelling could mitigate the impact of seasonal prescribing: Tuzistra XR is indicated for the relief of cough and symptoms associated with upper respiratory tract allergies or the common cold. This should facilitate ongoing prescribing during the summer hay fever season.

Operational leverage: Moxatag (extended release amoxicillin) is on track for launch by mid-CY16 through the same salesforce. Vernalis is also seeking to in-license other commercial- or late-stage developmental assets that fit its business model. This would enable the company to leverage its existing fixed commercial infrastructure and relationships (with physicians, pharmacies, wholesalers and payers).

Indirect competition: Tuxarin ER, an ER codeine/chlorpheniramine tablet, received FDA approval in July 2015. However, Spriaso, its originator, is yet to secure a marketing partner. We highlight that the market is dominated by liquid formulations; to illustrate, at peak, TussiCaps revenues were dwarfed by Tussionex c 40-fold).

Perceived room for dosing errors with a liquid product: a key sales message from solid dose forms is that there is less potential for dosing errors using a solid product. Nevertheless, liquid products are the mainstay of cough cold therapy in the US market, and arguably errors are less likely with ER product vs an IR equivalent.

Government policy changes: market dynamics are sensitive to policy changes such as the 2014 DEA rescheduling of hydrocodone from Schedule III to the more restrictive Schedule II, whereby the market share by value of this segment fell, with codeine- and benzonatate -based products being the beneficiaries. As Vernalis is developing a range of products covering various APIs, in-market dynamics should have a net neutral effect.

Potential for increased coupon levels: level of patient co-pay (ie the out-of-pocket expense paid by a patient) is important. If regulations change or managed care providers significantly alter their reimbursement levels, this may need to rise.

Strengths

Potential for improved patient compliance: 12-hourly dosing with XR cough cold medicines offers greater convenience over immediate-release counterparts (requiring four to six doses daily) with deemed equivalent efficacy based on bioequivalence data.

High barriers to entry: Tris’s patented LiquiXR sustained-release liquid reformulation technology is a key factor in creating high barriers to entry given the difficulty in creating a liquid formula that the FDA will approve due to the challenges in maintaining the stability of the formulation. Additionally, manufacturing and formulation patents covering Tuzistra XR run until 2029.

Limited direct competition: Tussionex (chlorpheniramine/hydrocodone) is the only other commercialised liquid ER product available in the US Rx market. Three Tussionex generics (one based on legacy UCB formulation technology, one on Tris’s technology and one on Neos Therapeutics’) are also available.

Potential for switching from Tussionex: DEA reclassification of hydrocodone may mean that hydrocodone prescribers find it easier and less costly and restrictive to prescribe Tuzistra XR than Tussionex. Physician market research conducted by Vernalis’s partners suggests there is willingness to prescribe Tuzistra XR among prescribers in the broader $1.6bn narcotics segment (which also includes codeine plus expectorants, as well as the hydrocodone segment), albeit at lower penetration in the hydrocodone segment than in the primary market.

Weaknesses

Gaps in formulary coverage: this is a key driver of the ability to capture market share. Approximately 19-25% of Rx are lost due to insurance rejections. Vernalis is targeting 75-80% of Tier 3 unrestricted plans; Ashfield, its market access partner, has secured c 55% to date (equal to c 120 million lives covered). CVS Caremark is a notable gap.

High level of reversals: approximately 22-26% of Rx lost are through patient abandonment or pharmacy reversals. Vernalis is seeking to reduce this by introducing incentives to increase pharmacy stocking and lowering patient co-pay cost via its coupon programme.

Variability in salesforce effectiveness: the field force is located around pockets of high-prescribing doctors. However, there is variability in territory performance. Focus is on identifying and addressing performance barriers (eg formulary coverage, training etc).

Seasonal variability means variable income streams: the fluctuating severity of the cold and flu season means that Rx levels will vary year-on-year. IMS Health data indicates that 29-35m Rx were filled annually between 2012 and 2015. As such, there will be fluctuations in Vernalis’s future income streams and profit once its products are on the market.

Opportunities

Significant market opportunity: focus is on the prescription-only (Rx) cough cold market, which in the US is valued at up to $3.5bn at brand pricing (c 35m Rx annually assuming a net price per Rx of $100).

Broad product portfolio: in collaboration with Tris Pharma, Vernalis is developing four other XR products. The APIs are undisclosed, but are understood to cover the other API market segments, with the exception of dextromethorphan (which would be an OTC product).

Non-narcotic product(s) in development: the portfolio includes benzonatate-based product(s) that would address a market segment worth c $940m at current pricing. This segment has benefited from the drop in market share of hydrocodone and is likely to be the next largest product alongside Tuzistra XR.

Labelling could mitigate the impact of seasonal prescribing: Tuzistra XR is indicated for the relief of cough and symptoms associated with upper respiratory tract allergies or the common cold. This should facilitate ongoing prescribing during the summer hay fever season.

Operational leverage: Moxatag (extended release amoxicillin) is on track for launch by mid-CY16 through the same salesforce. Vernalis is also seeking to in-license other commercial- or late-stage developmental assets that fit its business model. This would enable the company to leverage its existing fixed commercial infrastructure and relationships (with physicians, pharmacies, wholesalers and payers).

Threats

Indirect competition: Tuxarin ER, an ER codeine/chlorpheniramine tablet, received FDA approval in July 2015. However, Spriaso, its originator, is yet to secure a marketing partner. We highlight that the market is dominated by liquid formulations; to illustrate, at peak, TussiCaps revenues were dwarfed by Tussionex c 40-fold).

Perceived room for dosing errors with a liquid product: a key sales message from solid dose forms is that there is less potential for dosing errors using a solid product. Nevertheless, liquid products are the mainstay of cough cold therapy in the US market, and arguably errors are less likely with ER product vs an IR equivalent.

Government policy changes: market dynamics are sensitive to policy changes such as the 2014 DEA rescheduling of hydrocodone from Schedule III to the more restrictive Schedule II, whereby the market share by value of this segment fell, with codeine- and benzonatate -based products being the beneficiaries. As Vernalis is developing a range of products covering various APIs, in-market dynamics should have a net neutral effect.

Potential for increased coupon levels: level of patient co-pay (ie the out-of-pocket expense paid by a patient) is important. If regulations change or managed care providers significantly alter their reimbursement levels, this may need to rise.

Source: Edison Investment Research

Tuzistra XR sales to date; peak sales potential

H116 results provided the first update on launch progress. Trade distribution began in August 2015, with active promotion of Tuzistra XR beginning in September. Net sales (based on deliveries to wholesalers minus any rebates or discounts) to the end of December 2015 stood at £0.6m.

As with any product targeting the primary care market, there remains a degree of uncertainty at such an early stage in the launch regarding launch trajectory, the speed at which sales ramp up and the peak sales level that will ultimately be reached. We forecast peak sales of $240m for Tuzistra XR, which contains codeine polistirex (to suppress the cough reflex) and chlorpheniramine polistirex (an antihistamine to relieve allergic symptoms) as its active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs). Its primary market segment is codeine plus antihistamine treatments, which is valued at $470m at current brand pricing.

We estimate aggregate peak sales of $500m across the portfolio of cough cold products, which includes an average peak sales estimate of $65m per product for the remaining four cough cold products (despite the likely variability of their peak sales potential) on the basis that the launch order and APIs are undisclosed. We intend to refine our estimates following further disclosure. At this point, our total aggregate peak sales value equates to c 14% of the $3.5bn total branded cough cold prescription market for the five products based on June 2015 prescription data using an estimated net price per scrip of $100.

Tuzistra XR’s slow launch into a mild cough cold season suggests that FY16 consensus forecasts for the product will fall as product sales are unlikely to ramp up sufficiently in the second half of the financial year. From launch to end-February 4,571 Tuzistra XR prescriptions were written; £0.6m in net sales recorded included stocking into wholesalers and pharmacies. Nevertheless, a disappointing launch from a financial perspective is offset by the solid operational progress so far, which has established a foundation for the cough cold franchise.

Establishing the platform for growth

The commercial focus for Vernalis’s 80-strong salesforce is on (1) generating and improving awareness of Tuzistra XR so that physicians are prescribing the product, and (2) ensuring patients are able to fill their Tuzistra XR scrip. Accessibility to Tuzistra XR both physically (through being stocked at pharmacies) and financially (by gaining formulary coverage and minimising out of pocket expenses to the patient) are critical factors for facilitating the latter.

Steady progress is being made on both these fronts and encouraging trends are being seen, despite a cough cold season that is far from ideal from a new product launch perspective. As illustrated by Exhibit 2, the 2015/16 cough cold season has had a very mild start (weekly TRx down c 25% on prior year to January 2016) and is peaking later (weekly TRx down c 15% between September and February) than the typical October to February pattern. This inevitably has resulted in fewer potential patients presenting at their doctors with symptoms, and thus fewer opportunities for physicians to have Tuzistra XR and its marketing message at the front of their minds.

Vernalis has emphasised that Tuzistra XR has broad applicability across both the codeine and hydrocodone segments of the cough cold market, and Rx are seen across both. With the passage of time, the company is becoming better informed regarding traction with target audiences. Predictably, areas seeing high levels of Rx are those where there are early adopter physicians and favourable insurance coverage. Market research is ongoing to assess whether there is growth in physician awareness of Tuzistra XR over time and whether this is leading to increased market share. Further detail is expected to be shared at prelims in September.

Exhibit 2: Percentage of visits for influenza-like illness (ILI) reported by the US Outpatient ILI Surveillance Network; weekly national summary, 2015-16 and selected previous seasons

Source: CDC Weekly US Influenza Surveillance Report (accessed on 5 April 2016)

At launch, longer-term targets of 75-80% Tier 3 formulary coverage for Tuzistra XR at brand pricing, targeting a net price per Rx of up to $100, were set out. To date, Tier 3 coverage has been achieved at c 55% of plans, with a net price per Rx of $70-75. This net price per Rx is lower than the $90 anticipated for the early launch stage in part due to a lower average volume of product per Rx. Exhibit 3 provides an anonymised reconciliation of the wholesale acquisition cost (WAC) of $177 per average 168ml Rx (lower than the $192 per 180ml Rx assumed at launch) paid by the insurer to Vernalis, to the net sale price per Rx. Patient co-pay levels are higher than had been anticipated, through the two ongoing co-pay assistance programmes comprising e-vouchers (for pharmacies) and coupon cards (distributed to the physicians). This is an area of focus for Vernalis as a critical factor in commercial success includes minimising the cost to the patient.

Exhibit 3: Tuzistra XR early launch and pricing (illustrative)

Received/(paid)$

Payer

Patient

Pharmacy

Vernalis

WAC price per Rx (average 168ml)

(177)

177

Patient Tier 3 co-pay

xx

xx

Rebates:

Payers

xx

(xx)

Pharmacies

xx

(xx)

Co-pay assistance

xx

(xx)

Year one launch incentives

(xx)

Other gross-to-net

(xx)

2015/16 net sale per Rx to date

xx

~70-75

Source: Vernalis. Note: WAC = wholesale acquisition cost.

The first six months: Key takeaways

Steady growth in prescribing trends: growth in prescription numbers has been steady since launch, with acceleration in January, reflecting increasing physician awareness of Tuzistra XR and growing salesforce effectiveness. Data shows a week-on-week increase in new prescribers and also in the number of prescribers writing scrips each week.

Inventory pull-through from wholesalers into pharmacies: following the initial period of wholesaler stocking in, inventory levels at wholesalers are normalising (to around four weeks of inventory) on the whole reflecting increased pharmacy stocking, albeit with some variability in inventory levels due to regional consumption patterns. The increasing ex-factory volumes and wholesaler re-ordering reflect general increased market demand.

Prescription losses due to insurance rejection and patient abandonment: IMS FIA data indicates approximately half of scripts are being lost. 22-26% of these are through patient abandonment (patients opting for another cough cold product due to cost) or pharmacy reversals (pharmacy instigates switch to another product on the basis of stock or cost), with a further 19-25% due to insurance rejection (CVS Caremark is a key gap).

Continued efforts to increase pharmacy stocking: a combination of strategies to encourage pharmacies to take on Tuzistra XR inventory have been identified, including offering incentives such as off-invoice discounts on first orders and extended payment terms. An important part of the Vernalis assessment relates to the economic impact of pharmacy rebates, whether this is a transient incentive to give impetus to filling scrips or a longer-term component of the net price.

Coupon data is predictive of weekly TRx: coupon utilisation is running at c 76% (from an average of 68% since launch). Patient affordability is a key determinant of uptake; hence couponing has the potential to decrease abandonment rates as the out-of-pocket cost is minimised to $10 (at a maximum coupon of $80). Longer-term, a higher co-pay may be acceptable to patients, with $25-40 co-pay generally considered reasonable for a well-established, attractive drug.

Regional variability in salesforce effectiveness: four of the eight regions are outperforming, with the top quartile of reps writing 53% of Rx. Performance barriers are being identified and addressed. In some regions lack of formulary status at CVS Caremark, or otherwise low private reimbursement coverage, has a large impact. There is also an ongoing training and HR performance management element as the salesforce is a strategic asset. Investment in the salesforce will be primarily focused on training rather than expansion for the next cough cold season; the decision to maintain or increase the 80-strong salesforce will be taken when there is clarity on the likely approval timings of CCP-07 and CCP-08. In the longer term, as the pipeline builds, the salesforce will expand as reps may be targeting different audiences in different regions or a different message.

What does this mean for the next six months and beyond?

Vernalis’s ongoing initiatives to build physician awareness, boost pharmacy stocking and decrease the cost to patients should all help increase market share, and facilitate continued prescribing into the next cough cold season. There will also be a shift in rep training ahead of the launch of the spring allergy campaign, where the emphasis will be on cough due to allergy, as indicated in Tuzistra XR’s label. A successful campaign should ensure that Tuzistra XR Rx growth continues in the off-season as reps maintain their dialogue with physicians, albeit with a different message.

Equally importantly, the company is striving to improve formulary coverage to increase market share/minimise insurance rejections. These activities will have a longer-term outcome as formulary listings are typically multi-year. As mentioned earlier, CVS Caremark is the notable gap in current coverage, and Vernalis is working with CVS Caremark to support a formulary decision, however, the timing of such a decision is ultimately determined by priorities at the pharmacy benefit manager.

Vernalis is addressing all the major factors affecting its potential market share and rate of Tuzistra XR uptake; however the most fundamental driver of demand – the relative severity of the cough cold season – is outside of its influence. Assuming a solid foundation going into the 2016/17 cough cold season, the second year of Tuzistra XR’s launch should provide better insight into its sales potential. Critically, it will also determine whether Vernalis will need to raise additional funding.

Cash and equivalents stood at £54m at end-December 2015. The expectation when Vernalis last raised equity in 2011 (£65.9m net) was that it would have sufficient runway to reach sustainable profitability. However, this is contingent on the level of Tuzistra XR sales in FY17 and FY18 and the timing of success-based milestone payments to Tris. There is presently limited visibility on revenues, in part due to the slow and early stage of the Tuzistra XR launch. Conversely, operating costs and milestones are more apparent: we forecast operating costs of c £40m pa over the next two years (with limited room for cost savings) and estimate that $46m (c £32m) in milestone payments to Tris remain in FY17 and beyond. Our current forecasts suggest that Vernalis becomes sustainably profitable in FY18, with its cash position reaching a low point of £1.7m at end-FY18.

Development progress of cough cold pipeline

Four additional cough cold programmes remain in active development. The next most advanced, CCP-07 and CCP-08, are in pivotal bioequivalence studies, and are currently on track for NDA filing by end-2016. CCP-07 is the more advanced of the two, having already completed its single dose PK study. Due to the different technical challenges between different molecules, formulation work continues with CCP-05 and CCP-06, with PoC anticipated during the 2016 calendar year.

Leveraging the salesforce: Moxatag and other opportunities

Vernalis intends to launch its recently acquired antibiotic Moxatag, a once-daily tablet formulation of amoxicillin, into the US market by mid-calendar 2016. Its marketing message is aligned with Tuzistra XR, and as such it is an ideal companion product for the salesforce. Both are unique extended release formulations with the benefit of improved patient compliance targeted for the winter cough cold season. This compliance point is especially pertinent to antibiotics.

Vernalis is targeting a similar WAC to Tuzistra XR in the long term and a similar level of insurance coverage (Tier 3 unrestricted at 75-80% of commercial plans). A key difference, however, is that as well as having a coupon programme, Vernalis will be able to sample Moxatag. This should circumvent any issues with pharmacy stocking or reversals as a Moxatag sample will ensure a patient has a dose for the first 24 hours of treatment (a treatment course is 10 tablets over 10 days) and the pharmacy will see demand before having to routinely stock Moxatag. Vernalis estimates c 2.1 million patients are treated with amoxicillin each year by primary care physicians; these are the target audience for switching. Hence, the peak net sales potential is c $20m. Ahead of launch, we add Moxatag sales estimates to our financial forecasts and valuation.

Moxatag’s characteristics are a prime example of the type of product Vernalis is seeking to optimise its existing sales and marketing infrastructure. It is a relatively low-risk add-on product that is potentially highly complementary to Tuzistra XR, as it leverages a primary care salesforce that operates in a competitively attractive space with little counter detailing and brand-type switching message, rather than one reliant on key opinion leader influence.

Sensitivities

As Vernalis moves into the commercialisation phase for the cough cold portfolio, the near-term sensitivities have shifted towards Tuzistra XR sales growth. Key challenges remain ensuring adequate pharmaceutical supply and distribution of Tuzistra XR; ensuring stocking at pharmacies; gaining broad Tier 3 unrestricted formulary coverage; minimising patient out of pocket expenses and the speed and efficiency of the salesforce in executing its strategy and particularly in converting prescribers from immediate release to extended release formulations.

The first two years of launch will be critical in laying the foundations for the cough cold franchise, and also in determining whether Vernalis has sufficient funds to take it through to sustainable profitability. With operating costs well understood and reasonable visibility on when milestone payments are due to Tris, the level of Tuzistra XR sales is a major sensitivity.

The cough cold development pipeline is relatively low risk compared with mainstream pharma/biotech, is lower cost and the reformulation technology is proven through market approval for Tuzistra XR. We also highlight the high barriers to entry given the difficulty in creating a liquid formulation that the FDA will approve due to the challenges in maintaining stability.

The dynamics of the cough cold market are sensitive to government policy; eg DEA rescheduling of hydrocodone has caused some shifts in the market, but we note the Vernalis is well placed to cover these shifts through the development of a range of products covering other active ingredients.

Valuation

Our DCF valuation has decreased to £384m (86p per share), down from £439m, or 99p per share, using a 12.5% WACC across the development portfolio with the exception of Tuzistra XR and Frova at 10%, our standard WACC for a commercial-stage product. Our assumptions are summarised in Exhibit 4. Underlying valuation assumptions remain consistent with our November 2015 report (A player in the US prescription cough cold market), although we have made the following changes:

We have updated our financial forecasts in line with updated FY16 cost guidance (and updated risk weightings), the slower than anticipated launch of Tuzistra XR (hence lower revenue potential in FY16) and addition of Moxatag revenues from FY17 onwards.

We have updated our assumed development timelines for the cough cold portfolio and associated milestones payable to Tris. We now assume the following are payable: in FY16/17 two proof of concept milestones and two NDA acceptance milestones, $12m aggregated; in FY17/18 two NDA acceptance milestones, $14m aggregated; in FY18/19 two NDA acceptance milestones, $6m aggregated; and in FY19/20 two NDA approval milestones, $14m aggregated.

We have removed AUY922 and V158866 from our NCE valuation. Vernalis continues to seek partners for these assets (as well as V158411) but is making no further in-house investment; hence any future development plans are unclear. A deal would unlock potential valuation upside.

We have rolled our forecasts forward in time, updating the shares outstanding and the prevailing FX rate to $1.43/£ (previously $1.54/£).

Exhibit 4: Vernalis rNPV valuation summary

Source

rNPV (£m)

rNPV/share (p)

Assumptions

US Rx cough cold portfolio

577.9

129.8

Net of $12-14m of per product milestones due to Tris. 30% COGS (including Tris royalty payaway). Aggregate sales >$500m by 2024; UK tax rate of 21% from 2021.

Tuzistra XR (£433m rNPV): Peak sales of $240m; launched September 2015.

CCP-07 (£55.0m rNPV): peak sales of $65m; launch 2018; 75% success probability (PoC achieved).

CCP-08 (£50.9m rNPV): peak sales of $65m; launch 2019; 75% success probability (PoC achieved).

CCP-05 (£19.6m rNPV): peak sales of $65m; launch 2021; 65% success probability.

CCP-06 (£19.6m rNPV): peak sales of $65m; launch 2021; 65% success probability.

Moxatag

28.1

6.3

Peak sales of $20m; launch 2017. Undisclosed royalties/milestones payable to Pragma

NCE pipeline

8.7

2.0

Tosedostat (£1.4m rNPV): peak AML sales $150m; launch 2020; 15% success probability; 5% royalty.

RPL554 (£4.9m rNPV): peak COPD sales $200m; launch 2019; 25% success probability, 6% royalty.

Servier 1 (£0.5m rNPV): peak cancer sales $150m; launch 2023; 10% success probability, 5% royalty.

V81444 (£1.9m rNPV): peak immunoncology sales $200m; launch 2022; 15% success; 7% royalty.

Frova royalty stream

5.8

1.3

Europe: royalties of 25%, patent expiry Dec 2015, generics have entered some markets but not others, pricing and volume pressure seen overall. US: minimum sales level not reached.

Total pipeline rNPV

620.5

139.4

R&D

(42.8)

(9.6)

Includes offset for research collaborative funding.

SG&A

(237.0)

(53.2)

Includes cost of US sales infrastructure (included in R&D before Tuzistra launch).

Capex

(10.0)

(2.2)

Tangible assets (intangible capex, ie milestones paid to Tris, captured in cough cold portfolio rNPV).

Cash

54.0

12.1

Reported net cash at end-December 2015

Valuation

384.0

86

Source: Edison Investment Research. Note: Assumes WACC of 12.5% for all products with the exception of Tuzistra XR and Frova at 10% WACC, 445.1m shares outstanding and £/$ rate of 1.43.

Financials

Vernalis’s financial results for the six months to 31 December 2015 (H116) showed increased total revenue of £6.1m (up from £5.7m in H115), which included first Tuzistra XR revenues. Net Tuzistra XR sales of £0.6m were recognised; these revenues are reported on the basis of deliveries to wholesalers net of any rebates, discounts and returns provisions. Research collaboration income was flat at £3.8m, albeit with a shift in the split between FTE income and milestones: higher FTE income in H116 was offset by reduced milestone receipts (H115: £0.4m vs £0.2m received from Servier in H116). In both H115 and H116, one Frova API shipment was made to Menarini; however, due to negative FX impact and pricing pressure royalty revenues fell slightly to £1.6m (vs £1.7m).

In H216, Vernalis has guided towards one additional Frova API shipment, although following patent expiry in December 2015, volume and pricing are likely to be lower. So far, genericisation has had an impact in some European territories but not others. The research business will remain self-financing, with guidance that collaboration income will continue at similar levels to H116. H116 sales figures and current Rx data for Tuzistra XR suggest our full-year sales expectations are ambitious; we cut these to £1.26m (previously £5.8m). Consequently, we now forecast FY16 revenue of £11.9m (vs £15.9m previously).

Total operating costs pre-exceptionals were £19m (H115: £9.9m) reflecting increased Tuzistra XR-associated costs. Following Tuzistra XR launch in September, sales and marketing costs of £10.8m have been broken out; these include circa four months of salesforce activity and include the set up and ongoing costs of the inVentiv contract salesforce as well as promotional costs. R&D spend fell to £5.6m for H116, a 22% decrease from £7.1m in H115, largely due to completion of Vernalis’s in-house investment in its NCE pipeline and non-recurring Tuzistra XR pre-launch costs incurred in the prior period. G&A pre-exceptionals stood at £2.6m in H116 (H115: £2.8m), although this was offset by an exceptional £2.6m gain due to successful settlement of an onerous lease obligation.

Vernalis had guided that annualised H116 R&D and pre-exceptional G&A spend provide a “reasonable” run rate for ongoing future annual costs, while sales and marketing spend will increase in H216 as it will relate to the full six-month period. We forecast FY16 operating costs of £40.5m (vs £41.8m previously) and £40.6m in FY17.

Operating loss before exceptionals widened to £13.5m (or £10.9m post-exceptionals) vs £4.3m in H115 due to the increased investment in US cough cold sales and marketing infrastructure. Net finance income decreased to £2.9m from £4.6m in H115, although this was primarily due to FX effects with an unrealised FX gain of £2.8m and £4.5m respectively on translation of cash and investments from US dollars. Interest earned on cash balances was flat at £0.1m for both periods. Vernalis holds 66% of its cash in US dollars and a translation loss or gain is recognised at the end of each period at the prevailing exchange rate. Normalised PBT includes net financial interest but excludes other financial income from forex gains and losses. We forecast a £30m operating loss for FY16, and normalised PBT loss of £28m.

Cash and equivalents stood at £54m at end-December 2015. On our current forecasts, we expect that Vernalis will reach sustainable profitability in FY18, with its cash position reaching a low point of £1.7m at end-FY18. However, this is contingent on Tuzistra XR sales meeting or exceeding our expectations during the next two cough cold seasons and/or Tris milestones ($46m or c £32m in aggregate) becoming due in line with, or later than, our estimates. If a slower ramp in Tuzistra XR sales than forecast is achieved, Vernalis would have a short-term funding requirement in FY18.

Exhibit 5: Financial summary

£000s

2013

2015

2016e

2017e

2018e

Year end 30 June (from 2015), previously December

IFRS

IFRS

IFRS

IFRS

IFRS

PROFIT & LOSS

Revenue

 

 

14,084

19,882

11,859

30,622

67,724

of which: Cough/cold portfolio & Moxatag

0

0

1,259

20,979

58,042

Frova royalties

6,684

6,648

2,600

1,843

1,382

Collaborative income (R&D funding and milestones)

7,150

13,022

7,600

7,500

8,000

Other

250

212

400

300

300

Cost of Sales

(2,244)

(1,373)

(1,419)

(7,387)

(19,142)

Gross Profit

11,840

18,509

10,439

23,235

48,583

Sales, General & Admin

(3,299)

(8,635)

(28,689)

(27,948)

(29,611)

Research & Development

(14,416)

(22,563)

(12,020)

(12,659)

(10,339)

Other

180

611

225

0

0

Operating Profit reported

 

 

(5,695)

(11,835)

(30,044)

(17,372)

8,632

Intangible Amortisation

(1,349)

(571)

(782)

(909)

(1,591)

Exceptionals

1,608

243

2,630

0

0

Share-based payment

(876)

(1,855)

(876)

(876)

(876)

EBITDA

 

 

(4,652)

(8,855)

(30,580)

(15,219)

11,511

Operating Profit (norm)

 

 

(5,078)

(9,652)

(31,017)

(15,587)

11,099

Net Interest

420

2,733

2,988

171

46

Other financial income

(999)

(157)

0

0

0

Profit Before Tax (norm)

 

 

(4,658)

(6,919)

(28,028)

(15,416)

11,146

Profit Before Tax (as reported)

 

 

(6,274)

(9,259)

(27,056)

(17,201)

8,679

Tax

2,273

2,858

1,306

630

1,998

Profit from discontinued operations

0

0

0

0

0

Profit After Tax (norm)

(2,385)

(4,061)

(26,722)

(14,786)

13,143

Profit After Tax (as reported)

(4,001)

(6,401)

(25,750)

(16,571)

10,676

Average Number of Shares Outstanding (m)

442.1

442.3

445.1

445.1

445.1

EPS - normalised fully diluted (p)

 

 

(0.8)

(1.0)

(6.0)

(3.3)

3.0

Dividend (p)

 

 

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Gross Margin (%)

84.1%

93.1%

88.0%

75.9%

71.7%

EBITDA Margin (%)

-33.0%

-44.5%

-257.9%

-49.7%

17.0%

Operating Margin (before GW and except.) (%)

-36.1%

-48.5%

-261.5%

-50.9%

16.4%

BALANCE SHEET

Fixed Assets

 

 

7,730

15,066

23,213

33,647

42,450

Intangible Assets

6,292

12,895

19,635

29,824

38,023

Tangible Assets

1,438

1,637

2,043

2,288

2,892

Other

0

534

1,535

1,535

1,535

Current Assets

 

 

83,298

71,509

37,031

17,765

21,579

Stocks

130

0

281

2,024

5,244

Debtors

4,443

7,017

2,830

6,712

14,844

Cash

76,918

61,258

34,169

9,277

1,739

Other (tax and derivatives)

1,807

3,234

(248)

(248)

(248)

Current Liabilities

 

 

(4,501)

(5,215)

(5,331)

(12,193)

(13,258)

Creditors

(3,384)

(3,373)

(3,206)

(10,068)

(11,133)

Other creditors

0

(5)

(61)

0

0

Short term borrowings

0

0

0

0

0

Deferred income

(962)

(1,688)

(1,101)

(1,101)

(1,101)

Provisions and other current liabilities

(155)

(154)

(1,024)

(1,024)

(1,024)

Long Term Liabilities

 

 

(4,283)

(4,254)

(2,593)

(2,593)

(2,593)

Long term borrowings

0

0

0

0

0

Deferred income

(156)

(744)

(2,105)

(2,105)

(2,105)

Provisions and other long-term liabilities

(4,127)

(3,510)

(488)

(488)

(488)

Net Assets

 

 

82,244

77,106

52,321

36,626

48,178

CASH FLOW

Operating Cash Flow

 

 

(3,486)

(12,135)

(28,866)

(13,982)

1,224

Net Interest

446

353

232

171

46

Tax

1,929

1,887

4,548

630

1,998

Capex

(646)

(1,005)

(277)

(612)

(1,016)

Purchase of intangibles

(1,976)

(7,474)

(3,500)

(11,098)

(9,790)

Acquisitions/disposals

0

0

(2,386)

0

0

Financing

0

13

314

0

0

Dividends

0

0

0

0

0

Other

0

1,644

0

0

0

Net Cash Flow

(3,733)

(16,717)

(29,934)

(24,891)

(7,538)

Opening net debt/(cash)

 

 

(81,555)

(76,918)

(61,258)

(34,169)

(9,277)

HP finance leases initiated

0

0

0

0

0

Exchange rate movements

(904)

1,057

1,000

0

0

Other

0

0

1,845

0

0

Closing net debt/(cash)

 

 

(76,918)

(61,258)

(34,169)

(9,277)

(1,739)

Source: Edison Investment Research, Vernalis accounts

Edison, the investment intelligence firm, is the future of investor interaction with corporates. Our team of over 100 analysts and investment professionals work with leading companies, fund managers and investment banks worldwide to support their capital markets activity. We provide services to more than 400 retained corporate and investor clients from our offices in London, New York, Frankfurt, Sydney and Wellington. Edison is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (www.fsa.gov.uk/register/firmBasicDetails.do?sid=181584). Edison Investment Research (NZ) Limited (Edison NZ) is the New Zealand subsidiary of Edison. Edison NZ is registered on the New Zealand Financial Service Providers Register (FSP number 247505) and is registered to provide wholesale and/or generic financial adviser services only. Edison Investment Research Inc (Edison US) is the US subsidiary of Edison and is regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Edison Investment Research Limited (Edison Aus) [46085869] is the Australian subsidiary of Edison and is not regulated by the Australian Securities and Investment Commission. Edison Germany is a branch entity of Edison Investment Research Limited [4794244]. www.edisongroup.com

DISCLAIMER
Copyright 2016 Edison Investment Research Limited. All rights reserved. This report has been commissioned by Vernalis and prepared and issued by Edison for publication globally. All information used in the publication of this report has been compiled from publicly available sources that are believed to be reliable, however we do not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this report. Opinions contained in this report represent those of the research department of Edison at the time of publication. The securities described in the Investment Research may not be eligible for sale in all jurisdictions or to certain categories of investors. This research is issued in Australia by Edison Aus and any access to it, is intended only for "wholesale clients" within the meaning of the Australian Corporations Act. The Investment Research is distributed in the United States by Edison US to major US institutional investors only. Edison US is registered as an investment adviser with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Edison US relies upon the "publishers' exclusion" from the definition of investment adviser under Section 202(a)(11) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and corresponding state securities laws. As such, Edison does not offer or provide personalised advice. We publish information about companies in which we believe our readers may be interested and this information reflects our sincere opinions. The information that we provide or that is derived from our website is not intended to be, and should not be construed in any manner whatsoever as, personalised advice. Also, our website and the information provided by us should not be construed by any subscriber or prospective subscriber as Edison’s solicitation to effect, or attempt to effect, any transaction in a security. The research in this document is intended for New Zealand resident professional financial advisers or brokers (for use in their roles as financial advisers or brokers) and habitual investors who are “wholesale clients” for the purpose of the Financial Advisers Act 2008 (FAA) (as described in sections 5(c) (1)(a), (b) and (c) of the FAA). This is not a solicitation or inducement to buy, sell, subscribe, or underwrite any securities mentioned or in the topic of this document. This document is provided for information purposes only and should not be construed as an offer or solicitation for investment in any securities mentioned or in the topic of this document. A marketing communication under FCA Rules, this document has not been prepared in accordance with the legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research.
Edison has a restrictive policy relating to personal dealing. Edison Group does not conduct any investment business and, accordingly, does not itself hold any positions in the securities mentioned in this report. However, the respective directors, officers, employees and contractors of Edison may have a position in any or related securities mentioned in this report. Edison or its affiliates may perform services or solicit business from any of the companies mentioned in this report. The value of securities mentioned in this report can fall as well as rise and are subject to large and sudden swings. In addition it may be difficult or not possible to buy, sell or obtain accurate information about the value of securities mentioned in this report. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance. Forward-looking information or statements in this report contain information that is based on assumptions, forecasts of future results, estimates of amounts not yet determinable, and therefore involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of their subject matter to be materially different from current expectations. For the purpose of the FAA, the content of this report is of a general nature, is intended as a source of general information only and is not intended to constitute a recommendation or opinion in relation to acquiring or disposing (including refraining from acquiring or disposing) of securities. The distribution of this document is not a “personalised service” and, to the extent that it contains any financial advice, is intended only as a “class service” provided by Edison within the meaning of the FAA (ie without taking into account the particular financial situation or goals of any person). As such, it should not be relied upon in making an investment decision. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Edison, its affiliates and contractors, and their respective directors, officers and employees will not be liable for any loss or damage arising as a result of reliance being placed on any of the information contained in this report and do not guarantee the returns on investments in the products discussed in this publication. FTSE International Limited (“FTSE”) © FTSE 2016. “FTSE®” is a trade mark of the London Stock Exchange Group companies and is used by FTSE International Limited under license. All rights in the FTSE indices and/or FTSE ratings vest in FTSE and/or its licensors. Neither FTSE nor its licensors accept any liability for any errors or omissions in the FTSE indices and/or FTSE ratings or underlying data. No further distribution of FTSE Data is permitted without FTSE’s express written consent.

Frankfurt +49 (0)69 78 8076 960

Schumannstrasse 34b

60325 Frankfurt

Germany

London +44 (0)20 3077 5700

280 High Holborn

London, WC1V 7EE

United Kingdom

New York +1 646 653 7026

245 Park Avenue, 39th Floor

10167, New York

US

Sydney +61 (0)2 9258 1161

Level 25, Aurora Place

88 Phillip St, Sydney

NSW 2000, Australia

Wellington +64 (0)48 948 555

Level 15, 171 Featherston St

Wellington 6011

New Zealand

Frankfurt +49 (0)69 78 8076 960

Schumannstrasse 34b

60325 Frankfurt

Germany

London +44 (0)20 3077 5700

280 High Holborn

London, WC1V 7EE

United Kingdom

New York +1 646 653 7026

245 Park Avenue, 39th Floor

10167, New York

US

Sydney +61 (0)2 9258 1161

Level 25, Aurora Place

88 Phillip St, Sydney

NSW 2000, Australia

Wellington +64 (0)48 948 555

Level 15, 171 Featherston St

Wellington 6011

New Zealand

Bowleven — Update 6 April 2016

Bowleven

Continue Reading

Subscribe to Edison

Get access to the very latest content matched to your personal investment style.

Sign up for free