China Ecosystems – All about vertical.
Greater verticalisation looks like it is coming to China.
It looks like Qihoo is having another go at the smartphone market with the purchase of Blephone but behind this we see the next stage of competition between the Chinese Ecosystems.
Baidu, Alibaba, Tencent, (BATmen) Qihoo are all very good at what they do but in the mind of the users they are quite focused in their particular niches.
This is why the Chinese market is so fragmented as most users use services from all of these providers rather than sticking with just one.
In developed markets, users predominantly spend their Digital Lives in one ecosystem or another but not so in China.
This is how the sum of all the users of BATmen and Qihoo services is comfortably more than 3x the number of total smartphone users in China.
While the market and usage is growing, these players can grow nicely but as it begins to slow, they will need to compete more aggressively with each other in order to maintain their growth.
Edison research (see here) indicates that the best way to encourage users to try a new service over one that it is already established in the market, is to install the service on the device at the factory and set it as default.
This is common place in developed markets but in China devices are effectively blank when the reach the user and the user then picks and chooses which services he wants to download and use.
This is why we think Alibaba has purchased a controlling stake in Meizu and why it has created its own version of Android called Yun OS.
Now it looks like Qihoo is going the same way with the purchase of Blephone following its ill-fated relationship with CoolPad during 2015.
Qihoo has nearly 900m users of its mobile security software on mobile devices from which it derives advertising revenues but it has been trying to diversify away from this for some time.
The areas into which it is diversifying bring it directly into competition with the much bigger and much stronger BATmen but if it has control over hardware it has a chance to encourage users to try its service over those from the BATmen.
The problem of course is that Blephone does not have the volume of devices in the market to make a real difference but it is this same thought process that could lead to the acquisition of Xiaomi.
Xiaomi has all of the elements required including a good user experience and good volume in the market making it a prime candidate for acquisition by one of the BATmen.
Here we would put Baidu or Tencent at the top of the list as neither have yet made a play to assert greater control over hardware.
Xiaomi faces another very difficult year in 2017 and while it drifts sideways, we can only see its valuation continuing to sink and its investors getting itchy feet.
In China Tencent and Baidu remain my top two choices.
Disclaimer - Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Inherent in any investment is the potential for loss. This material is being provided for informational purposes only and nothing herein constitutes investment, legal, accounting or tax advice, or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold a security. This document may contain materials from third parties, which are supplied by companies that are not affiliated with Edison Investment Research. Edison Investment Research has not been involved in the preparation, adoption or editing of such third-party materials and does not explicitly or implicitly endorse or approve such content. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. It should not be assumed that any investments in securities, companies, sectors or markets identified and described were or will be profitable. All information is current as of the date of publication and is subject to change without notice. While based on sources believed reliable, we do not represent this material as accurate or complete. Any views or opinions expressed may not reflect those of the firm as a whole. Edison Investment Research does not engage in investment banking, market making or asset management activities of any securities. The material has not been prepared in accordance with the legal requirements designed to promote the independence or objectivity of investment research.