Snap Inc. – Valuation snaps.
Snapchat looks more like Twitter than Facebook.
Snapchat appears to be intending to focus on engagement metrics to justify its $20bn-$25bn valuation in the coming IPO.
We see this as a sure sign that real metrics such as revenue and profit will fall far short of that which a regular company would need to justify that valuation.
Snapchat is essentially an instant messaging platform with the ability to send video and pictures as well as some cool and fun video annotation features.
Although video is a big part of the appeal of Snapchat, we do not consider this to be a Media Consumption platform meaning that Snap Inc.’s coverage of the Digital Life pie is actually pretty low.
Given its current offering, we would be prepared to give it Instant Messaging and Telephony giving it total coverage of 14%.
We do not think that its offering is yet broad enough to allow it to monetise either Social Networking or Media Consumption.
Edison estimates that this would give it the ability to grow revenues to around $2.5bn per year in the best instance at which point it would then grow around 7-8%.
We suspect that the long-term promises being made will be far higher than this as we see no way in which this scenario could underpin a valuation of $20bn – $25bn.
Furthermore, we remain concerned that Snapchat’s core user base of 12-24 year olds is not as interesting to advertisers as the older demographic groups.
This is because this age group does not have a lot of money to spend on products and therefore is of less value to advertise to.
The net result is that Snap Inc. looks more like Twitter than Facebook and also has a user base less capable of generating revenues.
This means that Snap Inc. will need to innovate and develop its strategy beyond its core offering to have any chance of justifying the IPO valuation.
Snap Spectacles are an interesting move in this direction and are unique as the only product that has made wearing technology on one’s face cool.
However, they are not going to do anything to revenues and so will not directly alleviate the situation in which Snap Inc. will find itself.
The net result is that we see the following scenario without a major innovation on the part of Snap Inc:
First: An IPO at $20bn-$25bn which goes reasonably on the back of promises that don’t have to be met for a little while.
Second: A big miss on a set of quarterly results as revenues don’t come though as promised causing a collapse in the valuation.
Third: Recovery will only come with a major innovation from Snap Inc. or the company will be acquired by one of the much larger ecosystems.
On the basis of what we can see at the moment, we think a rosy future is already being paid for at $20bn – $25bn and so we would stay away from this one.
Disclaimer - Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Inherent in any investment is the potential for loss. This material is being provided for informational purposes only and nothing herein constitutes investment, legal, accounting or tax advice, or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold a security. This document may contain materials from third parties, which are supplied by companies that are not affiliated with Edison Investment Research. Edison Investment Research has not been involved in the preparation, adoption or editing of such third-party materials and does not explicitly or implicitly endorse or approve such content. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. It should not be assumed that any investments in securities, companies, sectors or markets identified and described were or will be profitable. All information is current as of the date of publication and is subject to change without notice. While based on sources believed reliable, we do not represent this material as accurate or complete. Any views or opinions expressed may not reflect those of the firm as a whole. Edison Investment Research does not engage in investment banking, market making or asset management activities of any securities. The material has not been prepared in accordance with the legal requirements designed to promote the independence or objectivity of investment research.