Xiaomi – State of the nation
Valuation lifted to $5bn but still 89% below last raise.
Xiaomi has supplied some details of its performance for 2016 but reading between the lines implies that it is pinning all of its hopes for 2017 on its ecosystem devices outside of phones.
There is no doubt that things were tough in 2016 as Counterpoint Research and Edison estimate that Xiaomi handset shipments fell by 16% to 60.8m units globally.
If we assume an ASP of around $175, this gives handset revenues of $10.6bn.
Xiaomi has also said that its network of ecosystem partners produced (other ecosystem products) revenues (TVs, smart routers, wearables, smart home) for Xiaomi of RMB15bn or $2.2bn.
If we assume Internet service revenues (3rd business line) of $100m, this gives a 2016 grand total of $12.9bn or RMB89bn.
This is down some 2% from what we think it earned in revenues in 2015 with other ecosystem products revenue largely offsetting the fall in handset sales.
This makes the revenue goal of RMB100bn ($14.4bn) look achievable as Xiaomi is calling for 10% growth.
We suspect that none of this is going to come from mobile phones as in the tightening environment, we think Xiaomi will hold share and revenues flat in the best instance.
Consequently, we think that Xiaomi is looking for revenues from its other ecosystem products to grow by around 64% and Internet service revenues to treble to $300m.
Given that the other ecosystem products segment more than trebled its revenues in 2016, this is not too much of a stretch to reach.
Therefore, we are comfortable with the revenue target.
However, despite whatever Xiaomi says, a viable business needs to make money and it is here where the problems remain.
We think that Xiaomi will make EBIT margins of 2-4% on its RMB 100bn of revenues in the best instance in 2017 giving EBIT of US$434m or RMB3bn.
We see no reason to change my valuation methodology and we continue to use Apple as a comparison.
We still believe that using the EV/Sales multiple is fundamentally flawed and so we continue to use EV/EBIT.
Apple’s forward EV/EBIT is now around 7.7x but because Xiaomi has a good chance of growth in 2017 whereas Apple may not, we will give Xiaomi a 50% premium to Apple.
We cannot give Xiaomi a higher premium simply because it is not going to grow fast enough.
Applying this premium gives a fair enterprise value for Xiaomi of $5bn, 40% better than the last time we valued the company, but still 89% below its last raise.
We think that Xiaomi can survive without raising more money but its ability to really invest and compete against the BATmen in China will be very limited putting it on the backfoot.
This valuation is unlikely to change until Xiaomi gets serious about making money for its investors rather than growing its user base.
We still see Xiaomi as an acquisition target where it would fit well into Baidu or Tencent.
Disclaimer - Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Inherent in any investment is the potential for loss. This material is being provided for informational purposes only and nothing herein constitutes investment, legal, accounting or tax advice, or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold a security. This document may contain materials from third parties, which are supplied by companies that are not affiliated with Edison Investment Research. Edison Investment Research has not been involved in the preparation, adoption or editing of such third-party materials and does not explicitly or implicitly endorse or approve such content. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. It should not be assumed that any investments in securities, companies, sectors or markets identified and described were or will be profitable. All information is current as of the date of publication and is subject to change without notice. While based on sources believed reliable, we do not represent this material as accurate or complete. Any views or opinions expressed may not reflect those of the firm as a whole. Edison Investment Research does not engage in investment banking, market making or asset management activities of any securities. The material has not been prepared in accordance with the legal requirements designed to promote the independence or objectivity of investment research.